Luis Concha1, Jorge Larriva-Sahd1, Gilberto Rojas-Vite1, Ramsés Noguez-Imm1, Ricardo Coronado-Leija2, Alonso Ramírez-Manzanares2, and José Luis Marroquín2
1Institute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Queretaro, Mexico, 2Computer Science, Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, Guanajuato, Mexico
Synopsis
The tensor model has
been widely used to infer characteristics of white matter through
diffusion MRI. Unfortunately, this model does not provide reliable
information about crossing fiber regions. Several models have been
proposed that seem to overcome the limitations of the tensor.
However, biological interpretations of such models are limited by the
lack of histological conformation. Using an animal model of axonal
degeneration, we compare histology to data
derived from two approaches (CSD and multi-tensor), in an effort to
provide validation of metrics that can bring substantial and
clinically useful information about crossing fiber regions.
Background
Diffusion-weighted
magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is extensively used to study white
matter microstructure.1,2
The tensor model3
has provided an intuitive mechanism to query specific aspects of
tissue micro-architecture (e.g., axonal density, myelin content).4–7
A major shortcoming of said model is its assumption of a single fiber
population within a voxel, which is incorrect in the majority of
human white matter.8
Alternatives to the tensor model are capable, in theory, to overcome
this problem.9,10
Advanced dMRI models provide information in regions of crossing
fibers that corresponds well to quantitative histology.11
However, it is often crucial to provide microstructural information
of each fiber system in a crossing region. Available methods lack
histological validation, which is explored herein for constrained
spherical deconvolution (CSD)12
and a multi-tensor model.13Methods
Animal
preparation: We used a model of axonal degeneration through
retinal ischemia.6,14
Analysis of the optic chiasm allows for the evaluation crossing
fibers, as axons from the nasal hemi-retina in each eye cross the
midline at this level. Thus, unilateral retinal ischemia results in
degeneration of half of the axons in the chiasm. Six adult rats were
studied. Retinal ischemia was induced through cannulation of the
anterior chamber of one eye and intraocular pressure was elevated to
120 mmHg and maintained for 20 minutes in one animal (Rat A) and 90
minutes in the other five. Animals were sacrificed five weeks after
treatment, and intracardially perfused with PFA and glutaraldehyde
doped with Gadolinium (0.2 mM). Brains were carefully extracted with
the optic nerves intact and placed in a vial filled with
perfluoropolyether oil. Imaging: Brains were scanned at 21 °C
using a 7 T Bruker Pharmascan 70/16 with 720 mT/m maximum gradient
amplitude and a 2⨯2 array surface coil. Following B0
shimming, dMRI were acquired with 125⨯125⨯125 mm3
resolution. We acquired dMRI in 80 directions, each with a b value of
2000 and 2500 s/mm2. (δ/Δ=3.1/10
ms), and 10 non-diffusion weighted images, using a segmented 3D
echo-planar acquisition. TR/TE=250/21 ms; NEX=1. Total scanning time:
15 hours. Histology: After scanning, rat A (20 min ischemia),
and rat B (90 min ischemia) were processed for histology, and 1
mm-thick sections at the level of the
optic nerves and chiasm were stained with toluidine blue. dMRI
processing: Images
were denoised15,16
and corrected for bias field inhomogeneities and eddy current
distortions. CSD with
maximum harmonic order of 6
was performed on the b=2500 s/mm2
images following iterative estimation of the single fiber response
function.17
Lobes
of the fiber orientation distribution functions (fODF) were segmented
to obtain fiber-specific metrics i.e.,
fixel-based analysis.18–20
To quantify the degeneration using the well-known tensor
metrics at multi-fiber voxels, we first compute the number and
orientations of the axon packs with a multi-resolution discrete
search method (MRDS),13
then the axial/radial diffusivities (λ|,
λ⟂) and compartment sizes are
computed independently per bundle with Levenberg-Marquardt non-linear
optimization. The new estimated diffusivities are used in the MRDS
framework to re-compute accurate orientations. The two stages are
iterated until convergence. The number of tensors per voxel is
computed by F-Test. Bundles were clustered into "normal"
and "affected" based on their crossing orientation (using
k-means).Results and Discussion
Histology
showed a dramatic reduction in the number of axons in the optic nerve
of the affected eye in rat B (90 min ischemia; Figure 1), but not rat A (20 min
ischemia, not shown),
in line with previous reports showing that optic nerve degeneration
only occurs after prolonged ischemia.14
The degenerated nerve of rat B was atrophied and showed few normal
axons, the majority of which were collapsed. The optic chiasm of rat
B showed healthy axons interdigitated with degenerated axons similar
to those in the affected nerve. Compared
to the non-lesioned rat (Figure 2), CSD
showed clear degeneration of the affected optic nerve through small
and wide FODs
resulting
in reduced apparent
fiber density and increased dispersion (Figure
3).
Using
a 25-voxel ROI at the center of each chiasm, we found fewer voxels
(11±6)
containing more than a single fiber population in the chiasms of rats
with 90 min ischemia, as compared to rat A (22).
Complexity
of the affected chiasms was reduced (0.17±0.14) as compared to rat A
(0.61) (Table
1).
Figure 4 demonstrates how the multi-tensor model
captures axonal degeneration in the optic nerves and chiasm, showing
clear changes in FA and radial diffusivity with respect to healthy
tissue. Diffusivity profiles explain most of the tissue damage, as
compartment sizes/fraction per bundle were similar for damaged and
affected nerves (both around 0.5, not shown).Acknowledgements
We thank Juan Ortiz for technical assistance for MRI scanning, Gema Martínez-Cabrera for assistance with histology. LC was partially funded by PAPIIT/DGAPA (IG200117). ARM and JLM were partially supported by SNI-CONACYT, Mexico, (Grants 169338 and 6243). GRV and RCL were supported by scholarships from CONACYT, Mexico.References
1. Concha L. A macroscopic view of microstructure: Using diffusion-weighted images to infer damage, repair, and plasticity of white matter. Neuroscience. 2014;276:14–28.
2. Assaf Y, Pasternak O. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)-based White Matter Mapping in Brain Research: A Review. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2008;34(1):51–61.
3. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys. J. 1994;66(1):259–67.
4. Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system - a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002;15(7–8):435–55.
5. Concha L, Livy DJ, Beaulieu C, Wheatley BM, Gross DW. In Vivo Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Histopathology of the Fimbria-Fornix in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J Neurosci. 2010;30(3):996–1002.
6. Song SK, Sun SW, Ju WK, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging detects and differentiates axon and myelin degeneration in mouse optic nerve after retinal ischemia. Neuroimage. 2003;20(3):1714–22.
7. Budde MD, Kim JH, Liang H-F, et al. Toward accurate diagnosis of white matter pathology using di?usion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57(4):688-695.
8. Jeurissen B, Leemans A, Tournier J-D, Jones DK, Sijbers J. Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013;34(11):2747–66.
9. Tournier J-D, Mori S, Leemans A. Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011;65(6):1532–1556.
10. Daducci A, Canales-Rodriguez EJ, Descoteaux M, et al. Quantitative Comparison of Reconstruction Methods for Intra-Voxel Fiber Recovery From Diffusion MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2014;33(2):384–399.
11. Budde MD, Annese J. Quantification of anisotropy and fiber orientation in human brain histological sections. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2013;7:3.
12. Tournier JD, Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Direct estimation of the ?ber orientation density function from di?usion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage. 2004;23(3):1176?85.
13. Coronado-Leija R, Ramírez-Manzanares A, Marroquín JL, Biscay R-J. Accurate Multi-resolution Discrete Search Method to Estimate the Number and Directions of Axon Packs from DWMRI. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;565.
14. Adachi M, Takahashi K, Nishikawa M, Miki H, Uyama M. High intraocular pressure-induced ischemia and reperfusion injury in the optic nerve and retina in rats. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch. Für Klin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1996;234(7):445–451.
15. Veraart J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D, et al. Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. NeuroImage. 2016;S1053-8119(16)30394-9.
16. Manjón JV, Coupé P, Concha L, et al. Diffusion Weighted Image Denoising Using Overcomplete Local PCA. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e73021.
17. Tax CMW, Jeurissen B, Vos SB, Viergever MA, Leemans A. Recursive calibration of the fiber response function for spherical deconvolution of diffusion MRI data. NeuroImage. 2014;86:67–80.
18. Raffelt D, Tournier J-D, Rose S, et al. Apparent Fibre Density: A novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. NeuroImage. 2012;59(4):3976–3994.
19. Dell’Acqua F, Simmons A, Williams SCR, Catani M. Can spherical deconvolution provide more information than fiber orientations? Hindrance modulated orientational anisotropy, a true-tract specific index to characterize white matter diffusion. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012;34(10):2464-83.
20. Riffert TW, Schreiber J, Anwander A, Knösche TR. Beyond fractional anisotropy: Extraction of bundle-specific structural metrics from crossing fiber models. NeuroImage. 2014;100:176–191.