Within the last decade, the scientific interest in brown adipose tissue (BAT) was greatly invigorated by the discovery of functional BAT in adult humans. Importantly, reduced BAT activity has recently been associated with predisposition to obesity and abnormal glucose homeostasis. The current gold standard for functional BAT imaging is CT-guided 18FDG-PET. Here, we describe a robust T2 mapping method to assess the metabolic activity of BAT independent of substrate selection and without the need of harmful radiation or contrast agents. Compared to previous T2*-based techniques the present approach is less prone to susceptibility and physiological artifacts especially at high fields.
Within the last decade, the scientific interest in brown adipose tissue (BAT) was greatly invigorated by the discovery of functional BAT in adult humans. The oxidation of fatty acids and glucose in BAT to generate heat, known as nonshivering thermogenesis, can account for nearly 50% of total energy metabolism in smaller mammals and an even larger fraction under cold acclimation[1]. Consistent with these findings, reduced BAT activity has been associated with predisposition to obesity and abnormal glucose homeostasis[2,3].
The current gold standard for functional BAT imaging is CT-guided 18FDG-PET[4]. However, recent studies have shown that it is also possible to assess the metabolic activity of BAT independent of substrate selection by MRI taking advantage of alterations in T2*[5,6]. Although this parameter is sensitive to BAT activation, T2*-based techniques are challenging because of the presence of susceptibility and physiological artifacts. Here, we describe a robust T2 mapping method for functional assessment of BAT in mice.
Due to the heterogeneous tissue composition, high iron content, and rich vasculature, T2 values in BAT are already under baseline conditions substantially lower than in WAT (Figure 1). This effect is expected to be even more pronounced under BAT activation which results in higher metabolic turnover, heat production, and perfusion.
To prove this assumption, mice were subjected to MRI examinations immediately before and 1 h after pharmacological β3 adrenergic stimulation (CL-316). As can be recognized from representative T2 maps shown in Figure 2, administration of the CL-316 resulted in a substantial decrease of T2 in dorsocervical BAT which is reflected in the color-coded maps by a change from yellow to red. Quantification of T2 over the entire BAT area (cf. Figure 3) revealed a significant drop in T2 from 58.2±4.2 to 46.0±3.7 ms upon 1 h of β3 adrenergic stimulation (n=6, P<0.001). Importantly, this decrease in T2 was restricted to BAT segments – neither muscle nor WAT T2 were significantly altered by CL-316 (Figure 2).
The T2 sensitivity for BAT activation was further corroborated when mice were challenged by cold exposure (Figure 4): After 2.5 h at 5 °C, BAT T2 dropped from 55.8±4.2 to 43.3±4.3 ms (n=6, P<0.001) – a similar magnitude as observed for β3 adrenergic stimulation. Interestingly, here also WAT T2 was significantly decreased. Planimetry of the BAT segments including all interscapular and dorsocervical depots (cf. Figure 3) exhibited that cold exposure for 2.5 h resulted in a substantial degradation of the total BAT content from 137.1±20.7 to 97.3±19.8 µl (n=6, P<0.01), while 1 h of CL-316 stimulation led only a minor decrease from 130.2±18.7 to 124.2±22.8 µl (n=6, n.s.).
Compared to T2*-based techniques the present approach is less prone to susceptibility artifacts especially at high fields. Furthermore, alterations in T2* are balanced by two opposing effects under BAT activation: While deoxyhemoglobin produced by oxidative metabolism of active tissue reduces the BOLD (T2*) signal, the increase in flow seen during local tissue stimulation increases the local BOLD signal and T2*.
[1] Cannon B, Nedergaard J. Brown adipose tissue: function and physiological significance. Physiol Rev 2004;84:277–359.
[2] Trayhurn P, Thurlby PL, James WPT. Thermogenic defect in preobese ob/ob mice. Nature 1977;266:60–62.
[3] Hamann A, Benecke H, Le Marchand-Brustel Y, Susulic VS, Lowell BB, Flier JS. Characterization of insulin resistance and NIDDM in transgenic mice with reduced brown fat. Diabetes 1995;44: 1266–1273.
[4] Virtanen KA, Nuutila P. Functional imaging of brown adipose tissue. Heart Metab 2010;48:15–17.
[5] Chen YI, Cypess AM, Sass CA, Brownell A-L, Jokivarsi KT, Kahn CR, Kwong KK. Anatomical and functional assessment of brown adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging. Obesity 2012; 20: 1519–1526.
[6] Khanna A, Branca RT. Detecting brown adipose tissue activity with BOLD MRI in mice. Magn. Reson. Med. 2012; 68: 1285–1290.