Kimberly L. Desmond1, David Bakhshinyan2, Maleeha Qazi2, Parvez Vora2, Chirayu Chokshi2, Sheila K. Singh2, and Nicholas A. Bock1
1Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2McMaster Stem Cell and Cancer Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Synopsis
A pipeline was developed, driven by 3D magnetization transfer-weighted images acquired without contrast agent, to automatically assess mouse models of patient-derived tumours against an atlas of control NOD-SCID mice, for the purposes of longitudinal, high-throughput screening of mice for response to cancer therapy and recurrence.
INTRODUCTION
Mouse models of human cancer are being developed to study the
response of individual patient’s tumours to multiple therapeutic regimens in
parallel for the purposes of personalized medicine. Among these, tumours
derived from brain tumour initiating cells (BTIC) are of especial interest for
characterizing recurrent or treatment refractory cancers, because they
represent the populations of cells responsible for tumour initiation[1, 2]. BTIC xenografts in
immuno-deficient mice (NOD-SCID) from new patient-derived cell lines have unpredictable
growth rates, responses to therapy, and times to recurrence. In vivo
imaging is essential to characterize these models by following the disease longitudinally
in reduced numbers of individual animals instead of large cross-sectional
cohorts characterized by histology at single timepoints[3]. It requires an
easily-repeatable, high-throughput 3D imaging technique. It ideally also uses
an endogenous contrast mechanism to avoid the impracticalities and potential
inconsistencies of using injectable contrast agents in a longitudinal study. We
found that magnetization transfer-weighted MRI provides clear contrast for
distinguishing tumour while also highlighting underlying anatomical features in
the brain[4-7].
Using
MT-contrast to drive registration against a healthy NOD-SCID atlas, we
developed a protocol for automated quantification and simple visualization of tumour burden. METHODS
3D
imaging was performed on a 7T Bruker Ascend 300WB with the MicWB40 probe. MT-weighted images were acquired according to
the protocol in Watanabe et al.[8]. The
image volume was acquired at 150 µm isotropic, with a FOV of 25 x 25 x 20 mm,
with slice orientation coronal, and read orientation H_F (head to foot). The saturation
pulse was applied once per TR, with a Gaussian shape, pulse width: 12 ms,
nominal flip angle 523° (max pulse amplitude
6.8 µT), offset frequency 2500 Hz. Image acquisition was performed with a spoiled
gradient echo with TR: 23 ms, TE: 3 ms, and excitation angle: 5°. The scan time for a single 3D image was 8 min
28 s. Eight averages were performed for
a total imaging time of 1 hr 7 min 11s. This protocol was originally developed for
contrast-enhanced anatomical brain images at 9.4T, so it was verified with
simulations that it would offer suitable contrast in a tumour-bearing mouse
brain at 7 T (Fig. 1). Images from 7 control NOD-SCID animals were registered (FSL, flirt) and averaged to form a reference
brain atlas (Fig. 2). Images from
tumour-bearing animals were registered to this atlas (FSL, fnirt), and the Jacobian determinant of the nonlinear deformation
was calculated at each voxel. A metric
of tumour volume was computed from the difference between non-CSF brain tissue
in the tumour-bearing animals and the non-CSF brain tissue in the atlas. Tumour-bearing
animals were imaged at multiple time-points after injection (in increments of
weeks) to establish engraftment and progression after treatment. H&E staining was performed for validation
of tumour distribution.RESULTS and DISCUSSION
MT-weighted
imaging obtained CNR of 19 between tumour and white matter, 16 between tumour
and gray matter, and 3 between white and gray matter in 1 hr. The Jacobian map
was used to visualize the distribution of the deformations (Fig. 3). Longitudinal evolution in a comparable coronal
slice from a single animal over the course of 3 weeks is shown in Fig. 4
alongside the quantitative tumour burden metric as a function of time after the
first imaging session. Excellent
consistency between MRI and histology was observed (Fig. 5). The smallest tumour visible on MRI verified
by histology was a mass of 500-1000 cells. Ongoing improvements to the pipeline are being
made to further separate effects of hydrocephalus from tumour growth, account
for normal brain development over time, and for tailoring deformation maps to enhance
tumour segmentation in conjunction with MT-weighted contrast. CONCLUSION
This pipeline using MT-weighted imaging is
effective for establishing tumour engraftment and detecting recurrence after
therapy, is repeatable and applicable to a wide range of xenograft cell lines
in mouse brain.Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge a Terry Fox Project Program grant for funding mouse tumour model development.References
1. Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M,
Bonn VE, Hawkins C, Squire J, and Dirks PB. 2003. Identification of a cancer
stem cell in human brain tumors.
Cancer Res. 63(18): 5821-5828.
2. Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID,
Squire JA, Bayani J, Hide T, Henkelman RM, Cusimano MD, and Dirks PB. 2004.
Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature. 432(7015):
396-401.
3. Bock NA, Zadeh G, Davidson LM, Qian
B, Sled JG, Guha A, and Henkelman RM. 2003. High-resolution longitudinal
screening with magnetic resonance imaging in a murine brain cancer model. Neoplasia. 5(6): 546-554.
4. Desmond KL, Moosvi F, and Stanisz
GJ. 2014. Mapping of amide, amine, and aliphatic peaks in the CEST spectra of
murine xenografts at 7 T. Magn.
Reson. Med. 71(5): 1841-1853.
5. Boorstein JM, Wong KT, Grossman RI,
Bolinger L, and McGowan JC. 1994. Metastatic lesions of the brain: imaging with
magnetization transfer.
Radiology. 191(3): 799-803.
6. Mathews VP, Caldemeyer KS, Ulmer JL,
Nguyen H, and Yuh WT. 1997. Effects of contrast dose, delayed imaging, and
magnetization transfer saturation on gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of brain
lesions. J. Magn. Reson.
Imaging. 7(1): 14-22.
7. Ikezaki K, Takahashi M, Koga H,
Kawai J, Kovacs Z, Inamura T, and Fukui M, Apparent
diffusion coefficient (ADC) and magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) mapping
of experimental brain tumor, in Brain
Edema X1997, Springer. p. 170-172.
8. Watanabe T, Frahm J, and Michaelis
T. 2010. Myelin mapping in the living mouse brain using manganese-enhanced
magnetization transfer MRI.
Neuroimage. 49(2): 1200-1204.