In this work we propose and evaluate, for the first time, the use of a single-turn-single-gap Transmit Line Resonator as a combined RF-transceive and B0-shim element. We compare this design to a standard loop in terms of both RF and B0-shimming performance. The benefits of our combined TLR/B0-shim design are improved RF performance due to the fixed and smaller number of lumped elements, and the increase in B0-shim efficiency. Our results show the TLR element design to be an ideal building block for high-channel-count integrated Parallel Reception, Excitation and Shimming (iPRES) arrays.
Purpose
Monolithic Transmission Line Resonators (TLR) consist of overlapping gapped conductor strips on the two sides of a low-loss dielectric substrate. By varying parameters such as trace width, substrate thickness and permittivity, number of gaps and number of turns per layer, it is possible to build a distributed capacitance resonant structure. The TLR design has been shown to be a good choice for the construction of RF coil arrays1-3. In this work we propose and evaluate, for the first time, the use of a single-turn-single-gap TLR as a combined RF-transceive and B0-shim element. We compare this design to a standard loop4,5 in terms of both RF and B0-shimming performance. The benefits of our combined TLR/B0-shim design are improved RF performance due to the fixed (independent of loop size) and smaller number of lumped elements, and 2x increase in B0-shim efficiency. Our results show the TLR element design to be an ideal building block for high-channel-count integrated Parallel Reception, Excitation and Shimming (iPRES) arrays5.Methods
A single-element TLR was built on a 3.175mm thick Rogers RO5880 substrate. As shown in Figure 1, we chose a rectangular TLR shape with outer dimensions of 40mm x 75mm. For these dimensions, using TLR theory3 augmented by numerical simulations (FEKO, Altair), we found that the TLR self-resonance could be tuned to 298MHz using a strip width of 2.5mm. Three lumped-element capacitors (Johanson Technology EIA1111) were used for matching, fine tuning and DC block (CM=20 pF, CT=4.7pF, Cblock=300pF). Three RF-chokes (Coilcraft 132-20SM, L=538 nH, Z=1kΩ@300MHz) were added to the circuit to allow shim current to flow. A single drive point was used for both RF and shim currents, reducing cable interactions compared to other designs4. Three more coils were built for experimental comparisons: a second TLR coil without chokes and DC block, and two simple loops with 4 capacitors per loop (3xCT=6.8pF, CM=27 pF), with and without chokes, as shown in Figure 2. All coils were matched and tuned to 298MHz with better than -15dB reflection coefficient. Unloaded and loaded Q factors (QU and QL, respectively) were measured in S12 using a dual-decoupled probe and a Keysight ENA E-5080A VNA. Scanner measurements were performed on a GE Discovery MR950 7T scanner. In order to evaluate the efficiency of the four coils in generating B1 and B0 fields, Bloch-Siegert B1+ and multi-TE B0 mapping was performed on all coils with and without DC current. A 32-channel array with 4 rows of 8 elements each was simulated via Method of Moments (FEKO) to study B1 performance and via Biot-Savart formula to study B0 performance.Results
Table 1 shows the Q factors measured for the four comparison coils. The Q ratio (QU/QL) was higher for the TLR-based coil compared to the standard loop, both in RF-only and RF-shim versions. This indicates stronger coupling to the phantom for TLR-based coils. However, the larger drop in Q ratio upon addition of chokes indicates greater sensitivity of TLR-based coils to the presence of chokes. The B1 maps in Figure 3 confirm these trends. The B1 efficiency of the TLR is higher than that of the standard loop (on average over the slice, +13% and +21% compared to the RF-shim and RF-only versions, respectively). The insertion of chokes caused a drop in B1 efficiency, which was stronger for the TLR than the standard loop: -18% and -8%, respectively. The B0 maps show that, as expected, the TLR was 2x more efficient than the standard loop for generating B0 offsets. Figure 4 (center) shows that a 32-channel iPRES array will have similar B1 efficiency as standard quadrature volume coils, and that using SAR-aware RF shimming, high B1 homogeneity (<5%) can be achieved while maintaining similar efficiency (12μT for 1 kW input power) and lower SAR (54% average over the volume) compared to CP mode. Figure 4 (right) shows that the whole-brain B0-shim performance of the 32-channel iPRES array is similar to 4th order spherical harmonic shimming.Discussion and Conclusion
We have demonstrated that the TLR can be easily modified to act as a high performance coil element for combined Transmit, Receive and B0-shimming. In this work, we tested a particular geometry in which the standard loop and the TLR needed the same number of chokes; despite this, the TLR was shown to be significantly more efficient at generating both B1 and B0 fields. Several inter-element decoupling designs are available, including capacitive, transformer or shielding ring decoupling2,3. We therefore conclude that the TLR-shim design forms an excellent foundation for the first practical iPRES array.[1] Serfaty, Stéphane, et al. "Multi-turn split-conductor transmission-line resonators." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 38.4 (1997): 687-689.
[2] Kriegl, R., et al. "Multi-turn multi-gap transmission line resonators – concept, design and first implementation at 4.7 T and 7T." Journal of Magnetic Resonance 273 (2016): 65-72.
[3] Kriegl, R., et al. "Novel inductive decoupling technique for flexible transceiver arrays of monolithic transmission line resonators." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 73.4 (2015): 1669-1681.
[4] Stockmann, Jason P., et al. "A 32-channel combined RF and B0 shim array for 3T brain imaging." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 75.1 (2016): 441-451.
[5] Truong, T.K., et al. "Integrated RF/shim coil array for parallel reception and localized B0 shimming in the human brain." NeuroImage 103 (2014): 235-240.
Figure 2: Top layer of the 4 prototypes: (a) simple loop, RF-only; (b) simple loop, RF-shim; (c) TLR coil, RF-only; (d) TLR coil, RF-shim. All prototypes were fabricated on a milling machine to assure tight dimensional tolerances and to better control the strip width on the TLR coils.