Bart WJ Philips1, Mark van Uden1, and Tom WJ Scheenen1
1Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Synopsis
Proton
MR spectroscopy has proven to be a valuable tool in the evaluation and
detection of prostate cancer by assessing metabolite ratios incorporating
choline and citrate signals. The
choline peak in the proton spectrum actually consists of several different
peaks of choline containing compounds[2], of which some can be distinguished
using 7 Tesla 31P spectroscopic imaging. In this work we present our first patient results of a method that combines 31P and 1H within one measurement using a 31P Tx/Rx and 1H Rx endorectal coil and we show its feasibility for correlating 31P and 1H metabolite ratios.
Introduction
Proton MR
spectroscopy has proven to be a valuable tool in the evaluation and detection
of prostate cancer by assessing metabolite ratios incorporating choline and
citrate signals. The intensity of the choline peak has been shown to increase
in prostate cancer lesions, whereas the citrate peak decreases [1]. The choline
peak in the proton spectrum actually consists of several different peaks of
choline containing compounds[2], of which some can be distinguished using 7
Tesla 31P spectroscopic imaging [3,4]. By performing 31P
and 1H MRSI within one measurement, the total choline 1H resonance
can be correlated to the 31P peaks of the different choline
containing compounds. This provides additional information about prostate
cancer biology and may give an
additional parameter in assessing prostate cancer aggressiveness. In this abstract
we present a method for combining 31P and 1H MRSI and
show our first in vivo results.Methods
Measurements were performed on a 7T whole-body MR system (MAGNETOM, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). An 8 channel multi-transmit body array coil was used in combination with an endorectal coil that featured a separate receive channel for 1H and a Tx/Rx channel for 31P (Figure 1). After local B0 and B1 shimming [5], a multiparametric MRI protocol (transversal T2W and diffusion weighted imaging) [6] was performed in combination with proton and phosphorus MRSI. Proton MRSI was performed using a PRESS-like sequence with RF pulses that are both spectrally and spatially selective (Figure 2) [7], such that a VOI is excited of only the spectral region of interest (2.3-3.3 ppm) (TR=1000ms, TE= 135 ms, 1 average, FOV=84x70x70mm3, 12x10x10 matrix, 50% Hamming filter, true voxel size=0.94cc and acquisition time=7:01 min). 31P MRSI was performed using a 3D phase-encoded pulse-acquire sequence with a non-selective BIR-4 excitation pulse (flip angle= 45⁰, TR=1500ms, FOV=120x100x100 mm3, 12x10x10 matrix, 100% Hamming filter, 4 weighted averages, true voxel size=4.2cc, acquisition time 13:09 min). 4 patients with histopathologically proven prostate cancer (Gleason 4+4, 3+4, 3+4 and one unknown Gleason score) were measured using this setup. The data for the phosphorus MRSI was fit using Metabolite Report (Siemens Healthineers Erlangen, Germany). 1H spectra were qualitatively assessed.Results
All
prostate cancer lesions were clearly identified on T2W and ADC imaging and in 3
out of 4 patients (patient 2, 3 and 4) a
well distinguishable choline peak was present in the 1H spectra of
the tumor (Figures 3 and 4). Lipids in some cases contaminated the 1H
citrate signal, but did not influence the choline signal. Spermine signals had
high intensities, due to refocusing the J-coupling with the spectrally
selective pulses [7]. The 31P-MRSI measurement showed phosphocreatine
(PCr) (low intensity within prostate, large signals from surrounding muscles)
and the well-separated phosphomonoesters phosphoethanolamine (PE) and
phosphocholine (PC) in all patients,. The
phosphodiesters glycerophosphocholine (GPC) and glycerophosphoethanolamine
(GPE) were occasionally detectable and if both present, they were also well-separated.
In patient 4 the 31P metabolite maps had strong asymmetry: the GPC+GPE
and PC+PE metabolite maps showed a high
intensity specifically within the prostate cancer lesion, whereas the smooth muscle
PCr signals outside the prostate appeared highest on the contralateral side. Assuming
a symmetric muscle PCr muscle signal, this indicates distinctly increased
levels of GPC+GPE and PC+PE within the cancer lesion (Figure 4). In this lesion
a highly elevated 1H choline signal was also present, whereas it was
completely absent in the contralateral prostate side. Discussion
The
described method can be used to obtain
31P as well as
1H
spectroscopic data of the prostate within one measurement and can correlate
31P
choline compounds to the
1H choline signal. The use of an endorectal coil hinders absolute
quantification, hence we need to rely on relative signal intensities, ratios,
or asymmetries. Metabolite ratios such as choline/spermine can be used to this
extent for
1H MRSI.
31P Ratios of PE, PC, GPE and GPC can
provide information about metabolic pathways and are therefore suitable
candidates for
31P MRSI. yATP
and PCr may also to some extend serve as reference values. A high
choline/spermine ratio can then be linked to
31P metabolite ratios. Due to the small patient group at the moment, no clinical conclusions can be
drawn from the data yet, but preliminary anecdotal results indicate that the
increase in
1H choline in some high Gleason score prostate cancer lesions
might partly be caused by a specific increase in GPC+GPE, which agrees with the
results that were found by Lagemaat et al [3].
Conclusion
31P
and 1H spectroscopy can be performed within one measurement and
enables an in vivo correlation between 1H and 31P
metabolite ratios.Acknowledgements
Dutch
Cancer Society [2014-6624]References
[1] Heerschap et al;
Anticancer Res 1997; [2] Awwad
HM; Clin Biochem. 2012;45(18):1548-53
[3] Lagemaat et al. Invest. Radiol. 2014; 49(5):363-72; [4] Kobus T; MRM, 2012;
[5] Metzger GJ et al, MRM. 2008; Feb;59(2):396-409; [6] Maas et al MRM
71:1711-1719 (2014; [7] Lagemaat et al. Magn Reson Med. 2015; 10.1002/mrm.25569