0859

T1ρ-weighted Dynamic Glucose Enhanced MRI
Patrick Schuenke1, Daniel Paech1, Christina Koehler1,2, Johannes Windschuh1, Peter Bachert1, Mark E. Ladd1, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer1, Alexander Radbruch1,2, and Moritz Zaiss3

1German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 2University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, 3Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany

Synopsis

Natural D-glucose can serve as a biodegradable contrast agent for the detection of tumors by means of Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) or Chemical Exchange sensitive Spin-Lock (CESL) Dynamic Glucose Enhanced (DGE) MRI. For application of CESL-based DGE-MRI at a 7T whole-body scanner, we implemented an adiabatic CESL sequence and essentially increased the temporal resolution employing a T-weighted acquisition scheme. Further, we introduced a simple, robust and quantitative DGE contrast. First application of T-weighted DGE-MRI in a glioblastoma patient provided a substantial contrast between tumor and healthy brain tissue and showed the dynamic glucose enhancement after a glucose bolus injection.

Purpose

Glucose is the main energy source of cancer cells. Accordingly the demand for glucose and the rate of glycolysis are elevated in tumor compared with healthy tissue1,2. Recently, it was shown that natural D-glucose can serve as a biodegradable contrast agent for the detection of cancer in patients employing Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST, glucoCEST)3,4 and Chemical Exchange sensitive Spin-Lock (CESL, glucoCESL)5. Our purpose was to develop a fast and robust glucoCESL technique, which enables quantitative Dynamic Glucose Enhanced MRI (DGE-MRI) at ultra-high field strengths with high temporal resolution.

Theory

For a two-pool system, e.g. protons of water and glucose, the on-resonant relaxation rate in the rotating frame (R) is given by R = R2 + Rex. The exchange dependent relaxation rate (Rex) is a linear function of the relative glucose concentration (cGlc) and is given by6

$$ R_{ex} = c_{Glc}\cdot\frac{k\cdot\delta^2}{\delta^2+4\pi^2\omega_1^2+k^2} $$

For T-weighted MRI we could show that the difference in signal intensities between a voxel-of-interest and a reference voxel with different exchange-dependent relaxation can be approximated by5

$$ \Delta S =S_{ref}-S \approx \Delta R_{ex} \cdot TSL \cdot e^{-R_{1\rho} \cdot TSL} $$

assuming that ΔRex∙TSL << 1, where TSL is the spin-lock time. This formula also holds for the same voxel but different time points, e.g. in T-weighted DGE-MRI before and after administration of glucose. Dividing ΔS by the reference signal Sref yields the T-weighted dynamic glucose enhancement (DGEρ), which is independent of relaxation parameters of tissue and solely depends on the glucose concentration change for a given TSL:

$$ DGE_{\rho}=\frac{S_{ref}-S}{S_{ref}} \approx \Delta c_{glc} \cdot TSL $$

Methods

All MR measurements were performed on a 7T whole-body scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Germany). For T-weighted imaging an adiabatic spin-lock sequence as published in Schuenke et al5 was used. Two sets of glucose solutions ("phantoms") with different relaxation times were used for in vitro measurements. For in-vivo DGE-MRI about 180 individual T-weighted images (TSL = 50 ms, B1 = 5 µT) were obtained in time intervals of about 7 seconds. The first 18 acquisitions were performed before the intravenous injection of 100 ml of 20% D-glucose and serve as reference signal (Sref).

Results

To confirm that DGEρ does not depend on the relaxation parameters of tissue we performed measurements on aqueous model solutions with different glucose concentrations and different relaxation rates. Despite the different relaxation curves (Fig. 1a), DGEρ as a function of ΔcGlc agrees well for both phantoms and shows the linear dependence expected from theory (Fig 1b). Thus, DGEρ reflects a quantitative contrast that solely depends on changes of the glucose concentration. This is similar to ΔR employing R mapping, which, however, suffers from a tenfold longer acquisition time if applied to studies in humans5.

Figure 2 shows the results of a first examination of a brain tumor patient with T-weighted DGE-MRI. The DGEρ image obtained about 8 minutes after glucose injection (Fig. 2c) clearly highlights the tumor region consistent with the T2-weighted (Fig. 2a) and gadolinium enhanced T1-weighted images (Fig. 2b). An increased DGEρ contrast was also observed in the ventricular area and in another region at the bottom of the tumor area. T-weighted DGE-MRI allowed investigating the glucose contrast with a temporal resolution of less than seven seconds in three regions of interest: 1) the glucose enhancing region, 2) the gadolinium enhancing region and 3) normal appearing white matter (NAWM). The ROI-specific curves are displayed in figure 2d. After the start of the injection (t = 0 min) all curves increase. However, NAWM shows only a minor increase compared with the tumor ROIs. The highest DGEρ values were observed in the tumor region about 10 min after start of the injection; the subsequent signal drop most likely results from patient motion.

Conclusion

We showed that CESL-based DGE-MRI can be accelerated essentially by employing T-weighted imaging instead of R mapping. When applied to a brain tumor patient, T-weighted DGE-MRI provided a distinct contrast between tumor and healthy tissue. The proposed contrast DGEρ was shown to be independent of relaxation parameters of tissue and directly proportional to changes of the glucose concentration. Furthermore, the technique inherits all benefits of the adiabatically prepared spin-lock approach like the negligible contribution from B1 dispersion5, and the higher glucose sensitivity and enhanced robustness against B0 inhomogeneities compared to CEST6. In combination with the simple and quantitative evaluation this suggests adiabatically prepared T-weighted DGE-MRI to be a feasible tool for the translation of glucose enhanced MRI into the clinics.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. WARBURG, O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123, 309–14 (1956).

2. Gatenby, R. A. & Gillies, R. J. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 891–9 (2004).

3. Xu, X. et al. Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) MRI: Translation to Human Scanning and First Results in Glioma Patients. Tomogr. a J. imaging Res. 1, 105–114 (2015).

4. Wang, J. et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Glucose Uptake and Metabolism in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Sci. Rep. 6, 30618 (2016).

5. Schuenke, P. et al. Adiabatically prepared spin-lock approach for T1ρ-based dynamic glucose enhanced MRI at ultrahigh fields. Magn. Reson. Med. (2016). doi:10.1002/mrm.26370

6. Jin, T., Mehrens, H., Hendrich, K. S. & Kim, S.-G. Mapping brain glucose uptake with chemical exchange-sensitive spin-lock magnetic resonance imaging. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 34, 1402–10 (2014).

Figures

Fig. 1: Measurements of glucose model solutions. a) T relaxation curves for two phantoms with different relaxation rates and each with glucose concentrations of 20 mM and 40mM. b) Proposed glucose contrast DGEρ for TSL = 100 ms as a function of the difference of the glucose concentration (ΔcGlc) for both phantoms. The curves show the expected linear dependence on ΔcGlc. The consistency of both curves proves the independence of DGEρ from absolute relaxations parameters.

Fig. 2: T-weighted Dynamic Glucose Enhanced MRI at 7T of a patient with glioma. a) High-resolution T2-weighted image. b) Gadolinium enhanced T1-weighted image. c) Glucose enhanced image (DGEρ) obtained at t ≈ 8 min. d) Dynamic Glucose Enhancement (DGEρ) as a function of time for the glucose enhancing region (ROI 1), the gadolinium enhancing region (ROI 2) and normal appearing white matter (ROI 3).

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)
0859