Rita Schmidt1, Alexey Slobozhanyuk2,3, Pavel Belov2, and Andrew Webb1
1Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Nanophotonics and Metamaterials, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 3Nonlinear Physics Center, Australian National University, ACT 2601, Australia
Synopsis
In previous research it has been shown that
high permittivity material pads can be used for global and local RF shimming,
as well as local SNR increase. Another recent approach is using
metamaterials. In this study we designed a thin, compact and flexible
metasurface which consists of metallic strips attached to 8mm thick pad made
from a CaTiO3 suspension in water. We show applications of the
hybrid metasurface in an examination of the human brain at 7T, concentrating to
produce a local increase in the SNR in the occipital cortex for imaging as well
as for spectroscopy.
Introduction
In previous research it has been shown that high
permittivity material pads can be used for global and local RF shimming, as
well as local SNR increase1-4. Another
approach for increasing local sensitivity and efficiency of the pulses is using
metamaterials. Several studies have shown proof-of-principle implementations of
metamaterials 5-8. However, the vast majority of these
implementations are based on three-dimensional metamaterial structures that
have very large physical dimensions. This is particularly problematic when
incorporated in a full setup that includes a large array of RF receive coils
placed in the vicinity of the body. In this study we designed a thin, compact
and flexible metasurface which consists of metallic strips attached to 8 mm
thick pad made from a CaTiO3 suspension in water. Specifically, we
show applications of the hybrid metasurface in an examination of the human
brain at 7 Tesla, concentrating on using the metasurface to produce a local
increase in the SNR in the occipital cortex for imaging as well as for
spectroscopy.Methods
Figure 1
shows the structural geometry of the metasurface with a full structure size of
17.5x17.5x0.9 cm3 including a 0.8 cm thick dielectric layer and a
plastic container on which copper strips were attached. The high permittivity
dielectric layer consists of a CaTiO3 suspension in water (volume ratio of 3:1 v/v) with a relative
permittivity of 110 and conductivity of 0.09 S/m,
which allowed a flexible structure to be formed. 3D EM simulations of
the B1+ field were performed using FIT (finite
integration technique) software (CST Microwave Studio, Darmstadt, Germany). All
B1+ maps were normalized to an accepted power of 1 Watt. The simulation setup included a 16-rung high pass
quadrature birdcage coil (inner diameter 30 cm; rung length 18 cm),
corresponding to the transmit coil used for experimental measurements. The coil
was loaded with the Virtual family model ”Ella” 9 with the mesh
resolution of 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.0 mm3. The
phantom setup simulations used a rectangular shape oil phantom with either a
flat metasurface structure or a simple high permittivity pad placed on top. In
the in vivo simulations, the metasurface structure was curved to best fit the
shape of the head. A quadrature birdcage coil (Nova Medical
NM-008A-7P) was used for RF transmission, and a close-fitting 32-channel array
coil (Nova Medical NMSC-025-32-7P) for signal detection. Phantom and in-vivo
images of a volunteer were acquired on a Philips Achieva 7 T MRI system. The
images included a standard gradient-echo sequence that was used for SNR
estimation and B1+ maps images were acquired using the
DREAM 10 sequence. The localized 1H spectroscopy used
STEAM sequence with TE of 12 ms, mixing time of 13 ms and TR of 3000 ms,
15x15x15 mm3 voxel, 64 averages.Results
Figure 2 demonstrates phantom results with an increase of
the B1+ in the simulation of approximately a factor-of-three
close to the metasurface and similar experimental results. Figure 3 shows
simulations of a full setup including human brain comparing setups with
dielectric pad only, with copper strips only and with the metasurface structure.
Figure 4 shows experimental results of the enhanced B1+
produced by the metasurface in the occipital cortex, as well as the higher
signal intensity on a standard gradient echo image. Four volunteers were
scanned and the average enhancement ratio for the RF transmit field was 2.0±0.3
and for the receive field 1.9±0.2. Taking into account the increase in maximum
SAR, the increase in transmit efficiency per square root of maximum SAR was a
factor of 1.6. An example of a localized 1H spectrum is demonstrated
in Figure 4c with an increase of 50% in the SNR, which agrees well with the
increase in the simulated B1- field integrated over the
spectroscopic volume.Conclusions
This study has demonstrated a new design of a flexible and
compact metasurface structure which can enhance the local RF transmit and
receive efficiency. Since the design is thin and flexible it can be shaped to
the anatomy of the patient, which is essential for combined operation with high
density MRI receive arrays. The
structures enable manipulation of the magnetic field distribution in the region
of interest, demonstrating the first applications of metasurfaces for in-vivo
imaging and spectroscopy of the brain, concentrating on the occipital cortex as
a region of interest. We have shown results at very high field, but this
approach can also be used at lower fields which are currently used for most
clinical studies.Acknowledgements
We are
grateful to I. Ronen for help with in-vivo spectroscopy experiment. This work
was supported by an ERC Advanced Grant and NWO Topsubside (AGW). The work of
A.S. and P.B. has been partially supported by Russian Science Foundation (Grant
15-19-20054).
.References
[1] Haines K. et al. J.Magn.Reson. 2010; 203: 323-327. [2] Yang Q.X. et
al., Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65:358–362. [3] Teeuwisse W.M. et al., Magn Reson
Med. 2012; 67:912-918. [4] Brink W.M. et al. Magn.Reson.Med. 2014; 71:
1632-1640. [5] Freire, M. J., et al. J. Magn. Reson. 2010; 203: 81–90. [6]
Wiltshire, M. C. K. et al. Science. 2001; 291: 849–851. [7] Radu , X. , et al. Metamaterials, 2009; 3(2): 90-99. [8]
Slobozhanyuk, A. P., et al. Adv. Mater. 2016;
doi: 10.1002/adma.201504270, [8] Zivkovic, I. , Scheffler, K. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med.,
2014; 22, 4834. [9] Christ, A., et al. Phys. Med. Biol.,2010; 55: N23–38. [10]
K. Nehrke K., Börnert P., Magn. Reson. Med. 2012; 68: 1517–1526.