Structural and functional alterations of the Locus coeruleus (LC) are implicated in various neurological diseases, including Alzheimer’s. Current standard spin-echo based approaches to imaging the LC suffer from several limitations at 3T, including long acquisition time and highly anisotropic resolution. In this study, we have evaluated in healthy human subjects different MRI contrasts both at 3 and 7 Tesla to image LC. We show that visualization of the locus coeruleus is best achieved with magnetization transfer contrast at 7T superior to standard T1- and T2-weighted methods.
The Locus Coeruleus (LC) is a neuromelanin-rich brainstem structure that is the source of noradrenaline in the cortex. LC is thought to modulate attention [1] and memory [2]. Recently, LC has been suggested as the starting point for Alzheimer’s disease pathology in the brain [3-5]. In vivo LC imaging is commonly performed with a 2D T1-weighted Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) sequence. Sufficient Signal-to-Noise ratio (SNR) with 3T TSE time requires the use of thick slices [6,7], restricted coverage and long acquisition times. Furthermore, LC contrast in TSE is thought to occur due to incidental Magnetization Transfer (MT) effects [8] and/or iron deposition [6]. Achieving incidental-MT contrast with 7T TSE is challenging due to increased energy deposition (SAR); this has hindered LC imaging at 7T so far. Goal of this project was to achieve high-resolution LC imaging at 7T and compare it with standard approaches at 3T.
Knowledge of the source of contrast is important for the development of a quantitative LC atrophy estimation method. In this study, we developed a high-resolution MT-weighted imaging approach based on a gradient-echo sequence and we compared its performance to a TSE at both 3T and 7T. Furthermore, we explored if the LC contrast reported in the TSE relates to MT effects or increased iron deposition.
1. Berridge CW, and Waterhouse BD. The locus coeruleus–noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Research Reviews. 2003;42(1):33-84.
2. Sterpenich V, D’Argembeau A, Desseilles M, et al. The Locus Ceruleus Is Involved in the Successful Retrieval of Emotional Memories in Humans. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26(28):7416-7423.
3. Marcyniuk B, Mann D, and Yates P. The topography of cell loss from locus caeruleus in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Sci. 1986;76(2):335-345.
4. Busch C, Bohl J, and Ohm TG. Spatial, temporal and numeric analysis of Alzheimer changes in the nucleus coeruleus. Neurobiol Aging. 1997;18(4):401-406.
5. Braak H, and Del Tredici K. Alzheimer's pathogenesis: is there neuron-to-neuron propagation? Acta Neuropathol. 2011;121(5);589-595.
6. Sasaki M, Shibata E, Tohyama K, et al. Neuromelanin magnetic resonance imaging of locus ceruleus and substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease. Neuroreport. 2006;17(11):1215-1218.
7. Keren N, Lozar C, Harris K, et al. In vivo mapping of the human locus coeruleus, Neuroimage. 2009;47(4):1261-1267.
8. Keren N, Taheri S, Vazey EM, et al. Histologic validation of locus coeruleus MRI contrast in post-mortem tissue. NeuroImage. 2015;113(1):235-245.
9. Mougin OE, Coxon RC, Pitiot A, et al. Magnetization transfer phenomenon in the human brain at 7 T. Neuroimage. 2010;49(1):272-281.
10. Marques JP, Kober T, Krueger G, et al. MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage. 2010;49(2):1271-1281.
11. Mugler III JP, Brookeman JR. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med. 1990;15(1):152-157