Niklas Wehkamp1, Frederik Testud 1,2, Patrick Hucker1, Stefan Kroboth1, Benjamin Richard Knowles 1,3, Jürgen Henning1, and Maxim Zaitsev 1
1Department of Radiology - Medical Physics, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 2Siemens Healthcare AB, Malmö, Sweden, 3German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
Synopsis
The presented
approach utilizes artificial neural networks trained on magnetic field
monitoring data in order to predict respiration induced B0-field
fluctuations in the brain under the condition of normal breathing. From the
predicted B0-field fluctuations it is possible to distinguish the
respiration induced resonance offset from the resonance offsets induced by
other sources during the course of the experiment. This allows for the
quantification of breathing related B0-field fluctuations in the
brain of normally breathing healthy volunteers. Furthermore it was observed that
the B0-field fluctuations resulting from normal respiration show
individual spatial dynamics for every volunteer.
Purpose
Respiration induced
image artifacts have been reported in numerous studies. 1 Although
many methods exist to reduce the respiration induced signal variation (gating,
temporal filtering, independent component analysis, …), only limited
experimental data about the actual influence of natural respiration (e.g.
without exaggerated deep breathing or breath-holds) on the B0-field
in the brain are available in the literature. 2-5 Magnetic Field
Monitoring (MFM) allows to measure magnetic field evolution using miniature
field probes. 6 However, all temporal-spatial magnetic field changes
are measured and their sources cannot be separated without an accurate model of
the source coupling. In this work the focus is on quantification of the
respiration-induced B0-field fluctuations in the brain at 3 Tesla
from MFM data. In order to quantify the fluctuations of naturally breathing
volunteers, we investigate if it is feasible to build a general model to
describe the coupling of respiration induced B0-field fluctuations
in the brain using machine learning methods.Methods
Experiments were
performed using a 3 T MAGNETOM Prisma with a 64-channel Head/Neck coil
(Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and prototype sequences. A dynamic field camera
(Skope LLC, Zürich, Switzerland) was used for external field sensing,
consisting of 5 fluorine based transmit/receive field probes and a stand-alone
spectrometer. The field probes were integrated into the head coil to be as
close as possible to the volunteers’ head. For all experiments the subjects
were instructed to remain still and breath normally (4 healthy MRI
compliant male, age 30±3, body mass index = 22.6±2.3). The volunteer
breathing patterns were recorded with the scanner respiration belt. The field
probe signals were acquired after each slice with an echo planar sequence (TR = 6.42
s, TE = 32 ms, 37 slices, 45 repetitions,
TA = 8:08 min).
Magnetic field estimation and data analysis were performed with MATLAB (The
MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). The first 4 (0, X, Y, Z) and the 7th
(Z2) term of the real-valued spherical harmonic expansion were chosen to
describe the magnetic field spatial distribution. The
time coefficients [c0(t), cX(t), cY(t), cZ(t), cZ2(t)] of the magnetic field spatial components were calculated from the field probe data, and were normalized to the maximum phase value within a sphere of 9 cm
radius.
In order to predict the
influence of respiration on the different B0-field
components, a model for each
volunteer was created by training an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). For the
ANN training a six-layer feed-forward neural network with 10 sigmoid hidden
neurons each and linear output neurons was used in combination with a
Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm. ANN allow to model nonlinear
coupling effects. The data division was set to random. The training was conducted
with data from the first 750 samples of each experiment. Subsequent testing was
performed on the remaining data.Results and Discussion
The Fourier Transform
(FT) of the different components of the B0-field fluctuations were analyzed over the experiments’ course. The power spectra depicted in Figure 1 suggest that B0-field fluctuations
resulting from normal respiration are very volunteer-specific and exhibit
individual spatial dynamics. This can
be seen from the peaks that correlate with respiration (between 0.25 and 0.4
Hz) appearing in different terms of the spherical harmonic basis function.
An example data set describing
the resonance offset, the respiration-induced resonance offset (RIRO) and the
resonance offset without the RIRO from the cX term of volunteer 1 is
depicted in Figure 2. In
order to verify the model, the power spectrum of the resonance offset from all
5 terms was calculated. An example set of power spectra is depicted in Figure 3.
The respiration-dependent peaks in c0 and cZ were reduced to noise, which
indicates that the individual model could successfully model the RIRO. The
maximum measured and simulated resonance offsets for all 5 terms of the 4
volunteers are listed in Table
1.
The estimated RIRO agrees with results from 3.Conclusion
For the conditions
of normal breathing a trained ANN allowed for the prediction of
respiration-induced B0-field variations for the c0, cX, cY, cZ, cZ2 terms.
The observed respiration-induced B0-field variation in the brain
reached maximum values of approximately 1.5 Hz for all 4 volunteers at 3 Tesla.
Furthermore it was observed that the B0-field fluctuations resulting
from normal respiration highly depend on the volunteer and show individual
spatial dynamics. The results presented demonstrate that it is possible to
model the influence of respiration by ANN with a volunteer-specific model.
However the individual characteristic of the effects suggest that it will be
difficult to build one general model for all subjects.Acknowledgements
This work was
funded in part through the NIH grant 2R01DA021146 and in part through
cooperation with Siemens. The authors acknowledge Dr. Gudrun Ruyters and
Matthias Gebhardt for valuable discussions.References
1. Brooks J et al., Physiological noise in
brainstem fMRI. Doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00623
2. Ray D et al., A model for susceptibility
artefacts from respiration in functional echo-planar magnetic resonance
imaging. Phys Med Biol 2000;45:3809-3820
3. Zahneisen B et al., Quantification and Correction of
Respiration Induced Dynamic Field Map Changes in fMRI Using 3D Single Shot
Techniques. Mag Reson Med 2014;71:1093-1102
4. Andersen M et al., Measuring Motion-Induced B0-Fluctuations in the Brain Using
Field Probes Magn Reson Med 2016;75:2020-2030
5. Duerst Y et al.
Real-Time Feedback for Spatiotemporal Field Stabilization in MR Systems Magn Reson Med 2015;73:884-893
6. Barmet et al. Spatiotemporal magnetic field
monitoring for MR. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:187–197.