Zheng Zhong1,2, Douglas Merkitch3, Muge Karaman1, Yi Sui1, Jennifer Goldman3, and Xiaohong Joe Zhou1,4
1Center for MR Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 3Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States, 4Departments of Radiology, Neurosurgery and Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
Parkinson’s
disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive
degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN). With the ability
to reveal tissue microstructural
changes, non-Gaussian diffusion models with high b-values can provide a wealth
of information related to the neurodegenerative process and complement the conventional Gaussian
diffusion model. Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging is typically performed with
limited spatial resolution and subject to image distortion. In this study, we have
combined a high-resolution, distortion-free diffusion sequence with a non-Gaussian
diffusion model to analyze the lateral dependence of tissue abnormalities in
the SN of PD patients compared to healthy controls.
Introduction
Structural
abnormalities in the substantia nigra (SN) have been reported in patients with
Parkinson’s disease (PD) in both neuropathology and neuroimaging studies1,2.
Clinical signs and symptoms of PD can be asymmetrical, and according to some studies, significantly
related to handedness3. These findings suggest that structural
changes of SN might also be laterally dependent. With the ability to probe
tissue structural abnormalities, diffusion MRI has been increasingly used in PD
studies. The
vast majority of published work relies on a mono-exponential, or Gaussian, diffusion
model. However, it is important to recognize that non-Gaussian diffusion models
can provide additional information on tissue microstructures and microenvironment6. Non-Gaussian
diffusion imaging is typically performed with limited spatial resolution and
subject to image distortion, imposing challenges for studying fine structures such
as the SN located in the distortion-prone brainstem. In this study, we have combined
a high-resolution diffusion imaging sequence using reduced field-of-view (rFOV)4,5
with a novel non-Gaussian diffusion model – the continuous-time random-walk
(CTRW) model6 – to investigate the possible lateral dependence of structural
abnormalities in the SN of PD patients compared to healthy controls (HC).Materials and Methods
Subjects:
With IRB approval, 27 clinically confirmed
PD patients (18 males, age: 71.2±6.3) and 23 age-matched healthy controls (13
males, age: 69.4±5.4) were included in the study.
Image Acquisition:
All subjects underwent diffusion MRI on a
3T GE MR750 scanner. Diffusion images were acquired from the brainstem using a customized
rFOV sequence5 (Figure 1) with seven b-values: 04, 502, 2002, 5004,
10004, 20004, and 30004 s/mm2
(the subscript denotes NEXs). The other
parameters were: TR/TE=3080/86ms, slice thickness=3mm, FOV=10cm×6cm, and matrix
size=160×96, producing a voxel size of 0.6×0.6×3mm3. At each non-zero b-value, trace-weighted images were obtained to minimize the effect
of diffusion anisotropy.
Image and Statistical Analyses:
The
CTRW model describes the diffusion-weighted (DW) signal using a Mittag-Leffler
function, Eα:
$$M(b)=M_{0}E_{\alpha}(-(bD_{m})^{\beta}), [1]$$
where
Dm is an anomalous
diffusion coefficient, and α and β are the temporal and spatial diffusion
heterogeneity parameters, respectively6,7. Eq. [1] was used to fit
the multi-b-value diffusion images
voxel-by-voxel, producing maps of Dm,
α, and β. For comparison, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was also
computed using b-values of 0 and 1000
mm2/s.
For
each subject, regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on each side of the SN
separately.
The mean value of each diffusion parameter
within the ROIs was calculated and compared between the PD patient group (PG) and
the HC using a 2-tailed Student’s t-test. To evaluate the performance of
differentiating PG and HC, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was
employed for individual and combinations of CTRW parameters8, as
well as ADC.
Results
Figures 2A&B display two DW images
of the brainstem from a representative PD patient at two b-values.
Figures 2C-F show a set of maps of
ADC, Dm,
α, and β obtained from the same patient. The ADC within the brainstem was
higher than Dm,
possibly due to the non-Gaussian behavior that was not accounted for in the ADC
calculation9. For the HC, no significant difference was observed between
the left and right SN in any of the parameters (Figure 3, p>0.05). The bilateral SN regions were therefore combined and
used as a reference for the subsequent comparison. For the PG, significant
differences were found in the left SN, but not the right SN, when compared to
the HC in all four parameters, α, β,
Dm,
and
ADC, as well as the combination of (Dm,
α,
β) (Figure 4; p<0.05). The ROC curves for differentiating between the left SN of
the PG and the HC are displayed in Figure 5. The combination
of Dm, α,
and β produced the highest
area under the curve (AUC=0.812), which outperformed the ADC (AUC=0.750).Discussion and Conclusion
Significant
differences in CTRW parameters, as well as ADC, between the PD patients and
healthy controls were observed only on the left side of SN, whereas no such
lateral distinction was seen in healthy controls. The high-resolution rFOV
sequence allowed for observation of the laterally dependent abnormalities,
which has not been reported previously in imaging studies. The use of the CTRW
diffusion model has allowed this lateral dependence be studied based on not
only diffusion coefficient (Dm
or ADC), but also spatial and temporal diffusion heterogeneities (α and β)6. It is plausible to speculate that tissue
microstructural changes preferentially occurred on the left side of PD patients,
possibly due to handedness (all patients included in this study were
right-handed). The similar change in ADC reinforces this explanation. This
important observation may provide new insights into understanding the progression
of PD.Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by NIH 1S10RR028898, NIH
K23NS060949, and Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Disease. We thank
Drs. Kejia Cai, Frederick C. Damen, Rong-Wen Tain, Liping Qi, and Jiaxuan Zhang
for valuable discussions, and Michael Flannery and Hagai Ganin for technical
assistance. References
1. Gibb, W. R. et
al.
Anatomy, pigmentation, ventral and dorsal subpopulations of the substantia
nigra, and differential cell death in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol.
Neurosurg. Psychiatry 54,
388–396 (1991).
2. Nagae, L. M. et al. Microstructural Changes
within the Basal Ganglia Differ between Parkinson Disease Subtypes. Front.
Neuroanat. 10,
(2016).
3. Barrett, M. J. et
al. Handedness and motor symptom asymmetry in
Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 82, 1122–1124 (2011).
4. Skare, S. et
al. Clinical multishot DW-EPI through parallel
imaging with considerations of susceptibility, motion, and noise. Magn. Reson.
Med. 57, 881–890 (2007).
5. Yi Sui et
al. Image Domain Segmented Diffusion Imaging Using
A 2D Excitation RF Pulse for Distortion Reduction. ISMRM, 2014
6. Karaman,
M. M. et al. Differentiating low- and high-grade pediatric brain tumors
using a continuous-time random-walk diffusion model at high b-values. Magn.
Reson. Med. 76, 1149–1157 (2015).
7. Budday, S. et
al. Physical biology of human brain development.
Front. Cell. Neurosci. 9, (2015).
8. Gortmaker, S. L. et al. Applied Logistic
Regression. Contemp. Sociol. 23, 159 (1994).
9. DeLano, M. C. et
al.
High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of adult brain: image contrast and
apparent diffusion coefficient map features. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21,
1830–1836 (2000).