Yolandi van der Merwe1,2,3, Chiaki Komatsu4, Lin He4, Maxine R Miller3,4, Ian Rosner4, Huamin Tang4, Joel S. Schuman5, Jose-Alain Sahel3, Michael B. Steketee3, Kia M. Washington4, and Kevin C. Chan2,3
1Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 2Neuroimaging Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 3Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 4Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 5Department of Ophthalmology, New York University, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
Approximately
39 million people worldwide suffer from irreversible blindness. Our recently
established whole eye transplant model (WET) gives the opportunity to provide
an intact optical system that could restore lost vision. In this study we use
manganese-enhanced MRI to examine the anterograde transport of the transplanted
and recipient visual pathways following WET. Our results show comparable
manganese enhancement between donor and naïve intraorbital optic nerves,
suggesting the presence of anterograde manganese transport in the donor optic
nerve. This in vivo imaging model
system may allow future examinations of neuroregenerative approaches for
connecting between the transplanted eye and the recipient’s brain.
Purpose
Approximately
39 million people worldwide are suffering from complete blindness due in part to
the inability of the visual system to regenerate after injury
1. Recently,
we introduced a whole eye transplant (WET) animal model
2,3, which
gives the opportunity to provide viable retinal ganglion cells and an intact optical
system to patients with irreversible vision loss. Using optical coherence
tomography and gadolinium-enhanced MRI, we showed that our WET model allows
ocular blood circulation, and preserves aqueous humor dynamics as well as
blood-ocular and aqueous-vitreous barriers in the transplanted eye
4,5.
In this study, we aimed to further develop an
in vivo imaging model system to determine the functionality of the
transplanted and recipient visual pathways following WET. Manganese-enhanced
MRI (MEMRI) has been used to monitor anterograde transport in optic nerve
injuries
6,7,8 and axon regeneration to the visual system
9,10,11.
Here, we used MEMRI to determine the level of anterograde manganese transport along
the visual pathways following WET.
Methods
Animal
preparation: Seven adult Lewis rats received orthotopic
WET on the right side only, as previously described2,4,5. In brief,
the donor flap contained the external ear, a section of temporal bone, skin of
the eye lid, all ocular tissues and the intraorbital optic nerve. A similar tissue section was removed in the
recipients, with the optic nerve being cut at the base of the globe, and the
donor graft was transplanted into the recipient with anastomoses between the
carotid arteries and external jugular veins (Fig 1). Intraocular pressure (IOP)
was measured before MEMRI using the TonoLab tonometer. MEMRI protocols: Three
weeks after WET, animals received bilateral intravitreal injections of 1.5µL of
100mM manganese chloride (MnCl2) solution. Before and 1 day after MnCl2 injections, all
animals were scanned using fast spin-echo
sequences in a 9.4-Tesla/31-cm
Varian/Agilent scanner, with a volume transmit and receive coil. 3D isotropic
T1-weighted MRI and 2D coronal T1-weighted MRI scans were taken with the
following parameters: 3D:
FOV= 32x32x32mm3, matrix resolution=192x192x192, TR/TE=200/10.7ms,
ETL=8. 2D: FOV= 26x26mm2,
matrix resolution=192x192, slice thickness=1mm, slice gap=0.5mm, number of
slices=7, TR/TE=600/7.9ms, ETL=8. 2D slices were oriented orthogonal to the prechiasmatic
optic nerves (ON). Data analysis: The patterns of manganese enhancement were
evaluated qualitatively on 3D MEMRI after axial maximum intensity projection.
Quantitatively, regions-of interests (ROI) were drawn manually on the
intraorbital ON using 3D scans, and on the prechiasmatic ON, lateral geniculate
nucleus (LGN) and superior colliculus (SC) using 2D scans in both hemispheres. An
additional ROI was drawn on a nearby saline phantom. The signal intensity for
each ROI was measured using ImageJ, and ON, LGN, and SC values were normalized
to the phantom. Two-way ANOVA was performed followed by post-hoc multiple
comparisons correction tests using GraphPad PRISM. Results
There
was no significant IOP difference between naïve and transplanted eyes (p=0.09)(Fig
2). Along the visual pathway projected from the naïve, left eye, significant
signal increase was observed post-Mn injection in the left intraorbital and
prechiasmatic ON (Figs 3-5), and in the right LGN and SC compared to pre-Mn
injection (Figs 3-5)(p<0.0001). Along the visual pathway projected from the
transplanted, right eye, significant signal increase was observed post-Mn
injection in the right donor intraorbital ON compared to pre-Mn injection (p<0.001)(Figs
3 and 5C). No apparent signal difference was observed between naïve and transplanted
intraorbital ON post-Mn injection (p=0.26)(Figs 5A and 5C). No apparent signal
intensity difference was observed between pre- and post-Mn injection in the right
recipient prechiasmatic ON, left LGN or left SC (p>0.05)(Figs 3-5). Note
also the stronger signal enhancement in the transplanted eye relative to the
naïve eye (Fig 3).Discussion
The
significant signal enhancement in the right intraorbital ON indicates the
presence of anterograde manganese transport in the donor ON at 3 weeks after
WET. Such enhancement was not statistically different from the left naïve ON, suggestive
of comparable extents of anterograde transport between donor and naïve ON. No enhancement
was detected in the right prechiasmatic ON, left SC or left LGN of the
recipient’s brain, suggesting a discontinuation of anterograde manganese
transport across the nerve coaptation site
after
ON transection and apposition. Such observation coincided with the less
manganese clearance from the transplanted eye.
Conclusions
With
comparable IOP between transplanted and naïve eyes, MEMRI suggested the
presence of anterograde manganese transport in the donor ON to a comparable extent
as the opposite naïve ON at 3 weeks after WET. Future MEMRI studies will
examine neuroregenerative approaches12,13 for connecting between the
transplanted eye and the recipient’s brain, so as to regain the neuronal
structure and function of the current WET model. Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the The Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs under Award No.
W81XWH-14-1-0421, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Administation, National Institutes of Health
P30-EY008098 (Bethesda, Maryland); Eye and Ear Foundation (Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania); and Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, New York).References
[1] World Health Organization, www.who.int/blindness/data_maps.
Accessed October 5th, 2016.
[2] Washington, KM., et al. Viability,
structural integrity, and aqueous humor dynamics are established in an
orthotopic whole eye transplant model. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual
Science. 2015; 56 (7), 4757.
[3] Couzin-Frankel, J. Second Sight. Science. March 2015; 347(6227):1194-7.
[4] Van der Merwe Y, et al. In vivo evaluation of ocular physiology and structural
integrity of the optic nerve upon whole eye transplantation using gadolinium-enhanced
MRI and diffusion tensor imaging. ISMRM 2015 Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings,
Toronto, Canada, May 2015.
[5] Washington, KM., et al. Studies of
structure and function in whole eye transplantation. Investigative
Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2016; 57 (12).
[6] Thuen, M., et al. Manganese-enhanced
MRI of the optic visual pathway and optic nerve injury in adult rats. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Oct
2005; 22(4):492-500.
[7] Chan, KC., et al. Evaluation of the
retina and optic nerve in a rat model of chronic glaucoma using in vivo
manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. April 2008; 40(3):1166-1174.
[8] Chan, KC., et al. In vivo retinotopic
mapping of superior colliculus using manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance
imaging. Neuroimage. January 2011;
54(1):389-395.
[9] Sandvig A., et al. Axonal tracing of
the normal and regenerating visual pathway of mouse, rat, frog, and fish using
manganese-enhanced MRI (MEMRI). Journal
of magnetic resonance imaging. Sep 2011; 34(3):670-5.
[10] Thuen, M., et al. Combination of
Mn(2+)-enhanced and diffusion tensor MR imaging gives complimentary information
about injury and regeneration in the adult rat optic nerve. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Jan 2009; 29(1):39-51.
[11] Liang, Y., et al. CNS regeneration
after chronic injury using a self-assembled nanomaterial and MEMRI for
real-time in vivo monitoring. Nanomedicine:
Nanotechnology, biology, and medicine. June 2011; 7(3):351-359.
[12] Moore, DL., and Goldberg JL. Four
steps to optic regeneration. Journal of
Neuro-ophthalmology. Dec 2010;30(4):347-360.
[13] Benowitz, LI., et al. Reaching the
brain: Advances in optic nerve regeneration. Experimental neurology. Dec 2015; (15)30141-2.