Jinjin Zhang1, Sidath C Kumarapperuma2, Qi Shao3, Lakmal Kotelawala2, John C Bischof3, Carston R Wagner2, and Michael Garwood1
1Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 2Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Synopsis
Immunotherapies
have received increasing attention as novel therapeutics for the treatment of
cancer and autoimmune disease. In this study, IONP labeled PAR T-cells were tracked
and quantified in vivo using the SWIFT
sequence for positive contrast imaging and T1
mapping. The longitudinal relaxation rate constant (R1) showed a linear
dependence on the cell density in vitro
and thus was used to quantify T cell density in vivo in liver. These preliminary results demonstrate how positive
contrast from an ultra-short T2 sensitive sequence can provide a tool to
quantify the bio-distribution of T cells.
Introduction
Immunotherapies,
e.g. re-engineered T cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR-Ts), T cell
receptor engineered cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, have shown great
promise in clinical trials and received increasing attention as novel
therapeutics for the treatment of cancer and autoimmune disease [1-3]. Noninvasive
imaging will be needed to allow accurate evaluation of cell biodistribution in
clinical translation, especially for monitoring the uncontrolled proliferation
and off-target tissue accumulation. Comparing to other imaging methodologies, MRI has advantages of no ionizing radiation and
ability to image deep tissues at high resolution and high sensitivity. However,
the ability of conventional T2*-weighted
MRI to quantify cell distributions is limited due to low SNR from negative
contrast and “blooming effect”. Previously, we have shown SWIFT, an ultra-short
TE sequence, produces positive contrast with IONPs which can be quantified [5,6,7]. In this study, IONP labeled anti-PSMA
PAR T-cells (a novel non-genetic method to re-engineer the human T cells with
Prosthetic Antigen Receptors (PARs)) were tracked and quantified using the SWIFT
T1 mapping method in-vivo [8]. Method
Primary
T-cells were from donor derived peripheral blood mononuclear cells and
incubated in RPMI media. IONP labeling was achieved by incubating in IONPs
(Ferrotec, NH, USA) solutions at 0.5 mg Fe/ml [9].
The cells were then labeled with anti-PSMA PARs (treated group) prior to IV
administration. In-vivo studies were performed in 6 mice with bilateral flank
prostate tumor. 40 million treated PAR T-cells were injected intravenously in three
mice. Control group (n=3) were injected with PBS only. The treated group (n=3) were
imaged before, 24h-post and 48h-post injection. SWIFT images and T1 maps were acquired on a
9.4 T animal MRI scanner (Agilent Technologies, USA) using a volume coil, with
BW=384 kHz, TR=1.2 ms. The T1
map was acquired using variable flip angle method. GRE images were acquired for
comparison using BW=150 kHz, TR=4.2 ms, TE=2.1 ms. After imaging, major organs
and tumors were harvested for total Fe analysis by ICP-MS and immunohistochemical
staining. Results and discussions
Negative contrast from a GRE
image and positive contrast from a SWIFT image are shown in Figs. 2a&b. In
our previous studies, we have observed a linear relationship between the
measured R1 versus the concentration of IONPs both in-vitro and in-vivo [5-7]. Here,
in the phantom study, a constant concentration of IONPs was used for all cell
incubations, and this resulted in a linear trend between the measured R1 versus
number of cells (Fig. 2 d). As such, the calibration data can be applied to
quantify the biodistribution of T cells.
Tracking and quantification of
T-cells in treated mice are shown in Fig. 3. Representative images and maps of
one mouse before, 24h-post and 48h-post i.v. injection of the IONP-labeled and anti-PSMA
CSANs treated PAR-T cells are shown. The majority of IONP labeled PAR T-cells was
deposited in liver and spleen, which induced strong negative contrast in GRE
images (yellow dashed line) and caused apparent T1 & R1 changes in SWIFT
maps (black dashed line). Only small amount of IONP labeled anti-PSMA PAR
T-cells were observed in tumor (red dashed line).
The average R1 in the liver
and spleen of three treated mice at three different time points are shown in
Fig. 4. The R1 of liver at 24h-post and 48h-post is significantly different
from before injection (p = 0.0002 and 0.001). Using the calibration data, average
PAR T-cells density in liver is 9400 cells/μL 24 hour-post injection and
decreased to 7400 cells/μL 48 hour-post injection. From ICP-MS data, the
IONP-labeled T cells have about 0.05 mg Fe/(M cells). The calculated iron
concentration in liver (0.37 mg/g) is close to the ICP-MS data of liver at
around 0.3 mg/g. The change in spleen is not as apparent as in liver, but is
still statistically significant (p = 0.02 and 0.028). Immunohistochemical
staining in Fig. 3d showed iron (blue, left) and human anti-CD3 (brown, right)
in tumor section (48 h-post) and indicated T cell extravasation. Conclusions
IONP-labeled anti-PSMA PAR T-cells delivered
through i.v. injection were tracked and quantified by using positive contrast with
an ultra-short T2-sensitive sequence. The T-cell density in liver was
quantified. The amount of T-cells accumulated in tumor is not apparent. These preliminary results demonstrate
the utility of T1 mapping based on an ultra-short T2-sensitive sequence for
quantifying the bio-distribution of IONP-labeled T-cells.Acknowledgements
This work was funded by: NIH P41 EB015894, WM KECK Foundation, UMN AHC Faculty development grant.References
[1] Kalos M. et al. Sci.
Trans. Med. 2011, 3.
[2] Grupp S. A.
et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1509.
[3] Tey S-K.
Clin. Trans. Immunol. 2014, 3:e17
[4] Idiyatullin D et al. J Magn Reson 2006;181(2):342.
[5] Zhang J. et
al. Magn Reson Med 2014;71(6):1982.
[6] Zhang J. et
al. Magn Reson Med 2016, DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26394
[7] Zhang J. et
al., ISMRM, 2015, No.225.
[8] Shen J. et
al., Prosthetic Antigen Receptors. J Am Chem Soc 137, 10108-10111
[9] Bhatnagar P et al. Scientific reports 2014;4:4502.