Karl P Kunze1, Teresa Vitadello2, Christoph Rischpler1, Markus Schwaiger1, and Stephan G Nekolla1
1Nuclear Medicine, TU Munich, Munich, Germany, 2Cardiology, TU Munich, Munich, Germany
Synopsis
This cardiac multimodality study combines the use of metabolic
18F-FDG PET imaging with coronary angiography as well as DCE-MR perfusion
imaging to investigate the relationship of myocardial metabolism and perfusion
in chronic ischemia. A patient group with chronic total occlusion received exams
pre- (PET/MRI+Angiography) as well as post- (MRI+Angiography) coronary intervention.
Results showed a range of subtle to heavy resting perfusion deficits, with
variable intra-patient relationships to metabolic deficits as indicated by 18F-FDG
PET. Comparison of coronary angiography results with the corresponding
quantitative perfusion analysis pre- and post-intervention suggest that resting
perfusion is more sensitive to micro- than macrovascular coronary integrity.
Background
As of today, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) myocardial
perfusion MRI under pharmacologic stress is a well understood and clinically
established tool to test the significance of coronary artery disease.
Regional perfusion differences under resting condition are however not as well
understood. Although it is suspected that such defects at rest represent
microvascular changes as a consequence of chronic or acute ischemia, it is not
clear on what level of the coronary microvasculature these changes occur and
what their relationship to actual (metabolically measurable) tissue damage is.
Therefore, this study aims to utilize the potential of simultaneous PET/MRI to
quantitatively compare MRI-based resting perfusion flow with 18F-FDG viability
PET, acting as an established marker for metabolic tissue integrity. The impact
of changes in the macrovascular coronary circulation on resting perfusion
estimates was tested by performing repeat scans both pre- and post coronary
intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) in combination with
invasive coronary angiography.Methods
All imaging was performed on a 3T PET/MRI scanner (Biograph
mMR, Siemens, Erlangen). CTO patients received a pre-intervention PET/MRI exam
comprising an insulin-clamped 18F-FDG viability PET, a resting state DCE-MRI
perfusion scan as well as T1 and ECV mapping. Four patients returned for a
follow-up MRI-only scan six months after recanalization of the respective
occluded coronary artery directly followed by invasive coronary angiography. MRI
perfusion imaging was performed using a 2D SR-FLASH sequence as described
previously1. Quantification of perfusion flow, i.e. plasma flow Fp,
was performed based on nonlinearity correction using T1-mapping2 and
subsequent deconvolution analysis with singular-value decomposition (SVD). For
each patient, perfusion results from six
sectors of one left-ventricular short-axis slice were compared between initial
and follow up scans, as well as to results of the pre-intervention PET scan. Individual
sector values were quantitatively compared as relative differences to the
respective slice average, as it is known that absolute resting perfusion values
exhibit significant inter-patient differences depending on the general
physiological state, and absolute signal values from viability PET depend on
the efficacy of the insulin-clamping. Therefore, a maximum relative perfusion
difference dFp was defined as:
$$
dF_p =\frac{F_p(slice~average)-F_p(lowest~segment~in~slice)}{F_p(slice~average)}
$$
Control MRI data from four subjects without any known
cardiac disease were acquired and processed in the same way in order to
establish a significance level for small relative flow differences, as e.g.
errors in the surface coil intensity correction can induce small systematic
differences in Fp estimates across the LV myocardium (Fig. 1).
Results
After fusion of 18F-FDG images with the initial perfusion
segmentation, relative differences were compared between 18F-FDG PET as well as
pre- and post-intervention Fp values. For all patients, the location
of the segment exhibiting the smallest Fp estimate was located in
the territory of the initially occluded coronary artery and did not change
between pre- and post-intervention scans. This was the case despite newly
developed high-grade stenosis in vessels different from the initially occluded
and reopened one in two of four cases (Patients 1/4 in Fig. 2). For the control
group, dFp was on average 5.4% with a standard deviation of 1.7%. Thus,
relative flow differences in the CTO patient group were significant, i.e.
attributable to physiology, if dFp was larger than 9% (>5.4%+2SD)
. For the patient group, average dFp for the occluded
territories was virtually the same between initial (19.3%) and follow-up scans
(21.1%). The analogous sector-wise FDG analysis yielded an average dFDG of 19.7%
with a much smaller inter-patient variability than dFp results. Individual
differences between dFp and dFDG however varied across a large range,
two examples for this variation are given in Figures 3 and 4. Qualitative
analysis of the ECV maps ((d) in Figs. 3 and 4) yielded a greater concordance between
ECV and FDG images than between ECV and Fp results (Fig. 3).Conclusion
Combining quantitative pre- and post-intervention DCE-MRI perfusion
results with the findings of invasive angiography, data from this study suggest
that perfusion deficits at rest represent the state of micro- rather than
macrovascular coronary integrity. Large differences were found in the
intra-patient relationships between DCE-MRI perfusion results and metabolic
integrity as indicated by 18F-FDG PET, suggesting further potential for PET/MRI
to quantitatively differentiate patterns of metabolic and functional
interactions in cardiac disease.Acknowledgements
This work was funded DFG Grant 8810001759
References
1. Kunze KP, Rischpler C, Hayes C, et al. Measurement of
extracellular volume and transit time heterogeneity using contrast-enhanced
myocardial perfusion MRI in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Med. in press DOI:10.1002/mrm.26320.
2.
Broadbent DA, Biglands JD, Ripley DP, et al. Sensitivity of quantitative
myocardial contrast-enhanced MRI to saturation pulse efficiency, noise and T1
measurement error: Comparison of nonlinearity correction methods. Magn Reson
Med. 2016;75:1290-1300.