Leif Oltedal1,2, Ute Kessler3, Donald Hagler1, Vera Jane Erchinger2, Dominic Holland1, Ketil J Oedegaard2, and Anders M Dale1,4
1Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States, 2Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, 3Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, 4Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, CA, United States
Synopsis
Major depression is the leading cause of disability
in the world. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) which is used in major depression
when other treatments are ineffective, has been shown to cause increased volume
of multiple specific subcortical and cortical regions. A sample of 19 patients
with T1-weighted 3D volumes acquired before and after ECT was analyzed by using
nonlinear registration and unbiased methods for quantification of regional anatomical
change (Quarc). The effect sizes of ECT-induced brain changes are large, and
the changes are more broadly distributed than previously thought. The results
suggest a global effect, probably modulated by the stimulation
parameters.
Target audience
Scientists/clinicians interested in accurate techniques for quantification and visualization
of structural brain changes, electroconvulsive therapy and neuroplasticity.Purpose
Major depression, a disorder that leads to
profound personal suffering as well as increased risk for suicide, is currently
the world’s primary cause of disability. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is
regarded as the most effective acute treatment of the disorder and thus should
be ideally suited to investigate the mechanisms of treatment response. Recent
neuroimaging investigations have suggested specific volumetric increase of the
hippocampi, amygdalae
1-3 and the striatum
4 as well
as regional increase in cortical thickness
5-6 after ECT.
Neurogenesis, which is known to occur in adult humans
7 has been
shown to increase in animal models of ECT
8, and neuroplasticity has
been put forward as a framework for understanding depression and treatment
mechanisms
9. We have earlier showed that by applying distortion
correction and rigorous image co-registration it was possible to quantify ECT
induced structural changes at the level of the individual patient and
identified significant volume increases of subcortical gray matter in a sample
of only 6 patients
10. Here we extend our analysis to look at the
entire brain in a larger sample.
Methods
Nineteen patients (age: 48.0 ± 16.6, 63 % female) receiving a series of
right unilateral brief-pulse ECT for a major depressive episode were included. Two
patients had received ECT > 12 months prior to the inclusion. ECT was
applied three times a week (mean number of sessions; 10.7 ± 3.7, mean charge
255.7 mC ± 123.4 mC). Structural T1-weighted isotropic (1 mm) volumes were
acquired on a 3T GE Signa HDxt or Discovery MR 750 MR system before the first
ECT stimulus and 7-14 days after the treatment series ended. A group of 9
healthy controls (age: 37.4 ± 15.4, 56 % female) were scanned at similar time
intervals. Images were corrected for non-linear gradient distortions11
and subjected to automated analysis with FreeSurfer (version 5.3;
surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/), which includes segmentation of subcortical white
matter, deep gray matter structures and automated parcellation of the cerebral
cortex12-15. Next, nonlinear registration and unbiased quantification of
regional anatomical change was done using Quarc16.Results
All
but one patient improved; mean MADRS (Montgomery and Aasberg depression rating
scale) score was 33.7 ± 5.2 before and 14.2 ± 8.3 after treatment. However, 8
of the patients were classified as non-responders (reduction in MADRS score <
50%).
Quantification
by Quarc showed broadly distributed volume increases in gray matter areas while
there was a decrease in volume of CSF spaces such as the lateral ventricles.
The Cohen´s d effect size of Quarc
estimated regional anatomical change were typically in the range 0.5 – 2, with
~25 of the 102 ROIs showing effect sizes > 1. The pattern of change was
broadly distributed throughout the cortex (Figure 1) as well as in the subcortical
gray matter (Figure 2). The mean whole brain volume increase was 0.7 % (effect
size 0.9; p = 0.03). The larger effect sizes were lateralized to the side of
the ECT stimulus (all patients received right unilateral ECT); e.g. the volume
change of the left and right temporal pole was 2.6 (p<0.05) and 4.9 % (p
< 0.001), respectively (n=19) compared to healthy controls (n=9). The areas
that changed most were the right temporal pole, hippocampus, amygdala, insula
region and caudal anterior cingulate (Table 1).
Discussion
Structural brain changes
after ECT are more broadly distributed than previously thought. Specific
hypotheses have led researchers to target a limited number or regions of
interest that may have precluded the identification of a more global effect. Change
patterns were lateralized to the side of the stimulus, suggesting that the stimulus
in itself is an important factor mediating the regional change, although
regionalized distribution of seizure activity may be an alternative
interpretation. Interestingly, the regions showing the highest change are part
of limbic circuitry, important for emotion processing. Conclusion
Volumetric
brain changes after ECT are more broadly distributed than previously thought. Changes throughout
cortex are approximately uniform at ~1%, with larger changes ~3-5% close to the
stimulating electrodes and confined to gray matter. This has profound
implications for theories that aim at explaining the therapeutic mechanisms of
ECT, and suggests other physiological processes than purely neuroplastic
changes.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Nordanskog P, Dahlstrand U, Larsson MR, et al. Increase in
hippocampal volume after electroconvulsive therapy in patients with depression:
a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study. J ECT. 2010;26(1):62-67.
2. Tendolkar I, van Beek M, van Oostrom I, et al.
Electroconvulsive therapy increases hippocampal and amygdala volume in therapy
refractory depression: a longitudinal pilot study. Psychiatry Res. 2013;214(3):197-203.
3. Joshi S H, Espinoza R T, Pirnia T,
et al. Structural Plasticity of the Hippocampus and Amygdala Induced by
Electroconvulsive Therapy in Major Depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79:282-292.
4. Wade B S, Joshi S H, Njau S, et
al. Effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Striatal Morphometry in Major
Depressive Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;10:2481-91.
5. van Eijndhoven P, Mulders P,
Kwekkeboom L, et al. Bilateral ECT induces bilateral increases in regional
cortical thickness. Transl Psychiatry 2016;6(8):e874.
6. Pirnia T, Joshi SH, Leaver AM, et
al. Electroconvulsive therapy and structural neuroplasticity in neocortical,
limbic and paralimbic cortex. Transl Psychiatry 2016;6(6): e832.
7. Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Bjork-Eriksson T, et al.
Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med. 1998;4(11):1313-1317.
8. Segi-Nishida E, Warner-Schmidt JL and Duman RS.
Electroconvulsive seizure and VEGF increase the proliferation of neural
stem-like cells in rat hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2008;105(32):11352-11357.
9. Dukart J, Regen F, Kherif F, et al. Electroconvulsive
therapy-induced brain plasticity determines therapeutic outcome in mood disorders.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(3):1156-1161.
10. Oltedal L, Kessler U, White S. et
al. ISMRM 2015, abstract 705.
11. Jovicich J, Czanner S, Greve D, et al. Reliability in
multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction
on phantom and human data. Neuroimage. 2006;30:436-443.
12. Dale AM and Sereno MI.
Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI
Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach. J Cogn Neurosci 1993;5(2):162-176.
13. Desikan RS, Segonne F, Fischl B,
et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex
on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006;31(3): 968-980.
14. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, et
al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures
in the human brain. Neuron 2002;33(3):341-355.
15. Fischl B, van der Kouwe A,
Destrieux C, et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral
cortex. Cereb Cortex 2004;14(1):11-22.
16. Holland D and Dale AM.
Nonlinear registration of longitudinal images and measurement of change in
regions of interest. Med Image Anal. 2011;15(4):489-497.