Jennifer A. Lefeuvre1,2, Sunil Patil3, Gunnar Krueger4, Tobias Kober5,6,7, Stéphane Lehéricy2, Daniel S. Reich1, and Govind Nair1
1TNS/NIB/NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States, 2CENIR, UPMC-Inserm U1127, CNRS 7225, Institut Cerveau Moelle, Paris, France, 3HC NAM USA DI MR COLLAB, Siemens Medical Solutions, Bethesda, MD, United States, 4HC NAM USA DI MR COLLAB, Siemens Medical Solutions, Boston, MA, United States, 5Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland, 6Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland, 7Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS 5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Synopsis
Spinal
cord lesions are known to be prevalent and contribute to disability in multiple
sclerosis (MS). We explored the use of the MP2RAGE sequence for better
delineation of spinal cord lesions in a clinical setting, and compared it with
standard sequences used in MS. A more accurate measurement of lesion load and
better visualization of the lesion location within the spinal cord can help
improving MS diagnosis and may be developed to an imaging biomarker of disease
burden.
Introduction
The detection of spinal
cord (SC) abnormalities is important for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS),
with 75-90% of patients1 presenting SC lesions. However, imaging the
thoracic spinal cord (t-spine) is especially challenging due to smaller cross
sectional size, respiratory motion, flow and susceptibility artifacts. Improved
visualization of the SC lesions in MS may help better explain disability in
patients with MS. Toward this end, we have previously reported better lesion
conspicuity with MPRAGE (Magnetization
Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echoes)) as compared to the standard T2-TSE, STIR, or GRE sequences at 3T2. The recently
developed MP2RAGE sequence3, has been proven to be useful in brain
imaging, especially in the presence of receive and transmit RF inhomogeneities
and to cancel residual T2*/PD contrast. In this study, we applied the MP2RAGE
sequence for SC imaging at 3T for routine clinical use, and compared it with the
previously optimized MPRAGE aiming at improving MS lesion conspicuity. Methods
Cervical spine (c-spine)
and t-spine were imaged in 9 subjects with MS (5 women, average 44 + 11 SD
y.o.) using the spine array coil on 3T system (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Previously
optimized protocols were used, including STIR (2D TSE,
TR/TE/TI/FA: 8130/63/210ms/120˚, 0.5 mm2 isotropic in plane,
1.4 mm slice thickness) in the sagittal
plane as well as T2*-MEDIC (2D GRE, TR/TE/FA: 560/17ms/20°, 0.8 mm2
isotropic in plane, 3 mm slice thickness) and T1-MPRAGE (3D TFL, TR/TE/TI/FA:
3000/4.5/900 ms/9°,
TA:9m45s) in both sagittal (1 mm3 isotropic) and axial
(0.8 mm2 isotropic in plane, 3-4 mm slice thickness) planes. These
sequences were compared to the MP2RAGE sequence (3D, TR/TE/TI1/TI2/FA1/FA2:
3500/3.5/900/1440 ms/9˚/9˚ with 1-1 binomial water excitation, TA:10m50s) in the sagittal and axial planes. The resolution for the sagittal and axial MP2RAGE
sequences matched, respectively, with the MPRAGE and the MEDIC resolutions.
SC lesions were visualized on uniform3 and
denoised (UNI-DEN) images, generated in the MP2RAGE by normalized complex
division, and are shown to reduce the background noise significantly4.
Two metrics were used to compare the performance of the sequences –
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (S1/SDnoise) and
contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) (SNR1-SNR2).Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows exemplary images comparing
the MPRAGE and MP2RAGE in the c/t-spine section. The sagittal MP2RAGE UNI-DEN
images showed reduced
artifacts and more homogenous signal through
the cord compared to the MPRAGE images. This allowed improved visualization of the
cord and of lesion tissue, especially in the t-spine, and discrimination of artifacts
from lesions, compared to STIR sequence. On axial, MP2RAGE shows a better
delineation of the cord edge, more consistency across slices, and an improved
contrast between cord and CSF as well as between cord and lesion. Figure 2
shows better image quality with fewer artifacts (bias field related as well as reduced
motion) in MP2RAGE (Fig. 2B,D) compared to the MPRAGE (Fig. 2A,C).
The denoise-filter in
MP2RAGE boosts the SNR from the cord by a factor of about 3.5 in comparison
with MPRAGE. The observed MS cord lesion was better delineated in the MP2RAGE
UNI-DEN (Fig. 3B) images than in the MPRAGE (Fig. 3A). Preliminary
results of CNR calculation between lesion, normal appearing cord (NAC) and, CSF
from MP2RAGE and MPRAGE images are shown in Table 1. While the MPRAGE gives
optimal CNR for visualization of cord and lesion, the individual inversion
contrast images of MP2RAGE do not (Fig. 3C,D). However, after the regularized “denoised”
normalized complex division the CNR of MP2RAGE is 4-5 times higher than MPRAGE,
thereby providing excellent visualization of both NAC and lesions. Axial orientation was chosen so as to be able to
increase the SNR through the use of thicker slices. Thick axial slices also
allow more efficient coverage of the entire SC.
In order to assess the accuracy of lesion detection with MP2RAGE, more lesions have
to be compared with MPRAGE. With a better contrast and sensitivity, MP2RAGE could
be used to follow the lesions evolution over the course of the disease.Conclusion
The use of MP2RAGE allowed better
visualization of the SC and lesions as compared to MPRAGE, primarily due to
reduction in receive bias fields, RF transmit field inhomogeneity but also
reduction in motion artifacts and B0 inhomogeneity.
Further improvements to axial
MP2RAGE using phase encoding reordering will
allow for efficient
coverage of the entire SC in about 15 minutes, which could lead to easy
clinical adoption for MS disease assessment. Addition of
spatial saturation pulses as well as navigator correction for further
improvement in image quality is under investigation.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1: Spinal cord abnormalities in recently diagnosed MS patients: added
value of spinal MRI examination. Neurology
2004; 62: 226–33.
2: Nair G, Absinta M, Reich DS.
Optimized T1-MPRAGE Sequence for Better Visualization of Spinal Cord MS Lesions
at 3T. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2013;34(11):2215-2222.
3: Marques J.P. et al. MP2RAGE, a
self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at
high field. NeuroImage 2010; 49: 1271-1281.
4: O’Brien K, Krueger G, Lazeyras F, Gruetter R, Roche A,
“A simple method to denoise MP2RAGE”, Proceedings of ISMRM 2013 (Salt Lake
City), abstract #269