Aline Seuwen1, Aileen Schroeter1, and Markus Rudin1,2
1Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University & ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, 2Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich
Synopsis
MRSI in mice reveals
changes in glutamate and lactate levels in somatosensory brain areas elicited
by electric hindpaw stimulation. Using increasing stimulus amplitudes, lactate signals
consistently decreased with increasing stimulus strength. This surprising
result might reflect accelerated lactate clearance triggered by a generalized
CBF increase in response to hindpaw stimulation, previously observed in this
species. In contrast to mice, Lac levels in the contralateral somatosensory
cortex of rats significantly increased with stimulus amplitude reflecting
increased glycolytic activity and no obvious indication of increased lactate
clearance. Despite the difference in Lac responses, similar Glu responses have been
observed in both species.
Introduction
Functional
proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS) measures signals arising from
endogenous metabolites and neurotransmitters in a time-resolved manner. Of the
various metabolite signals identified in the MR spectrum, several are directly
associated with neurotransmitter (glutamate, Glu; glutamine, Gln;
gamma-amino-butyric acid, GABA) or energy turnover (lactate, Lac; phosphocreatine,
PCr; creatine, Cr), and could serve as quantitative marker for neural activity.
Previously, we measured significant changes in Lac and Glu levels upon
electrical stimulation of the mouse hindpaw. While Glu levels consistently
scaled with the stimulus amplitude, Lac responses displayed an unexpected
behavior: a weak Lac increase for low stimulus amplitude, followed by a
decrease in Lac levels that scaled with stimulus strength [1]. Corresponding
BOLD fMRI measurements were found dominated by a strong and widespread cerebral
blood flow (CBF) response masking the specific BOLD signal change in the area
processing the somatosensory stimulus, in line with earlier findings [2]. The
generalized increase in CBF might lead to enhanced clearance of tissue Lac and
therefore explain the surprising results obtained with fMRS. In contrary to
mice, the fMRI signal in rats in response to unilateral sensory input displays
topological specificity, i.e. predominant BOLD signal changes in the
contralateral somatosensory cortex. Given the difference in stimulus-evoked
fMRI response between rats and mice, we wondered whether fMRS derived activity
readout, which should be less prone to hemodynamic confounds, displayed more
consistency across species. In particular, we investigated whether the unexpected Lac response would be also
observed in rats. We therefore carried out an fMRS study in rats analyzing
metabolic changes elicited by electrical hindpaw stimulation across large
cortical areas.
Methods
All experiments were
carried out at 9.4 T (BioSpec 94/30, Bruker BioSpin MRI GmbH, Ettlingen,
Germany). A cryogenic phased array coil was used for signal reception in
combination with a volume resonator for homogeneous transmission. In vivo
experiments were carried out in adherence with the Swiss law for animal
protection. Rats (N=10) were anesthetized using isoflurane (1.5%), intubated
and artificially ventilated with an oxygen/air (20% / 80%) mixture. Muscle
relaxant pancuronium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) was i.v.
administered. For spectroscopic imaging (SI), an axial slice comprising
somatosensory cortex, striatal regions and ventricles was selected using a 90°
pulse, and immediately followed by the acquisition of the FID (TR: 2500ms; FOV:
2.8x1.5cm; matrix: 26x11; slice thickness: 2.2mm; acquisition time: 12min).
First and second order shim terms were optimized using field maps. VAPOR was
used for water suppression, interleaved with saturation slices for outer volume
suppression. For electrical stimulation, needles were placed in both hindpaws.
Stimulation was applied as follow: 2mA (right), 4mA (right), 4mA (left), 6mA (right),
preceded, interleaved and followed with two SI scans at rest. For each
stimulation cycle: 5Hz, 40s stimulation, 20s rest, 10 cycles (for a total
duration of 10min). Relative quantification with total Cr as reference was performed using LCModel [4].
Results
Previous
results obtained in mice are summarized in Fig.1. Lac levels measured in the
contralateral S1HL region (Fig.1B) were elevated for stimulation with 1mA and
decreased when stimulating with 3mA. The Lac response appears unspecific (Fig
1A). In rats, spectra extracted from somatosensory areas (Fig.2A) displayed
at least 10 metabolite signals. For Lac, Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds where below
25%. During stimulation, Lac levels where elevated on average by 19%, 46% and
85% with increasing stimulation amplitudes of 2mA, 4mA and 6mA, respectively
(Fig.2B). Moreover the Lac increase was more pronounced in the contralateral
somatosensory area. Statistical maps indicate higher specificity as compared to
the mouse (Fig. 3). Similarly to the findings in mice, gradually increasing Glu
levels (by 2.5% and 5 %) were observed when stimulating with 4mA and 6mA. No
changes in Glu were detected upon stimulation with 2mA (Fig. 4). In mice, the
Glu increase was more pronounced (7% and 8% when stimulating with 2mA and 3mA,
respectively, Fig. 4).
Discussion
The Lac
increase at 1mA stimulus amplitude in mice indicates glycolytic activity, while
decreasing Lac levels with increasing stimulus amplitude hint at a dominant
contribution of general Lac clearance due to large CBF increases (and
eventually to the use of Lac as energy substrate to cope with high demands). In
contrast, the dose-dependent increase in Lac levels measured in rats reflects
increased glycolytic activity, while at the stimulus strengths used CBF
responses were not sufficient to significantly increase Lac clearance. This
hypothesis has to be tested by measuring CBF responses to stimuli in the two
species. Despite the difference in Lac responses a similar Glu response has
been observed in mouse and rat.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Seuwen et al, Proc.Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 23, 2015, 1979 [2] Schroeter et al, Neuroimage
94, 372–384. [3] Ielaqua et al, Proc.Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 23,
2015, 2037 [4] Provencher SW, Magn Reson Med 1993;30:672–679.