Liliana Ma1,2, Michael Rose3, Ozair Rahman1, Kelly Jarvis1,2, Joshua Robinson1,3, Cynthia Rigsby1,3,4,5, Michael Markl1,2,3,4,5, and Susanne Schnell1
1Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States, 3Department of Medical Imaging, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 4Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States, 5Division of Cardiology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
This study explores the potential of using dual-velocity encoding 4D flow MRI for in-vivo assessment of complex blood flow patterns in patients with diverse presentations of congenital heart disease.
Purpose
4D flow MRI can be applied in patients with congenital
heart disease for in-vivo assessment of complex 3D blood flow patterns in the
heart and surrounding vessels.1 These patients often
require assessment of a wide range of velocities, such as the slow
venous flow seen adjacent to higher velocity arterial flow patterns in patients
with single ventricle physiology. However, current 4D flow MRI techniques
assess blood velocity based on one pre-defined velocity sensitivity encoding
(venc), which is usually set above the maximum expected velocity. This
single-venc method results in either velocity aliasing for velocities greater
than the venc setting, or high noise levels for low velocities (v<<venc).2-4 To
address this limitation, we developed a dual-venc 4D flow MRI sequence with k-t
GRAPPA acceleration using a shared reference scan followed by two,
three-directional (low and high-venc) scans.5 High-venc data was
used to correct aliasing in the low-venc data, resulting in a dataset with the
favorable velocity-to-noise ratio of a low-venc setting but without velocity
aliasing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of k-t
GRAPPA accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI in patients with congenital heart
disease. We hypothesized that this technique would enable simultaneous
acquisition of high and low velocities with reduced velocity noise and improved
flow visualization by pathline and streamline integrity, resulting in improved
3D assessment of complex flow patterns. Methods
In addition to standard clinical contrast-enhanced cardiothoracic MRI, dual-venc
4D flow MRI was used to measure blood flow velocities in the thoracic aorta (12
patients) and whole heart (5) in 16 patients (8M/8, age=13.7±5.7years) with a
history of congenital heart disease and one healthy volunteer (M, age=62.0years)
(table 1). All scans were acquired on a 1.5T MAGNETOM Aera system (Siemens,
Germany) with k-t GRAPPA, R=5, flip angle=15°, and scan-specific
imaging parameters outlined in figure 1. Data analysis included corrections for
Maxwell terms and eddy currents (Matlab, The Mathworks, USA). High-venc data
was then used to correct aliased voxels in the low-venc data, resulting in an
anti-aliased, dual-venc dataset. Velocity noise was calculated as the spatial
mean of the temporal standard deviation in a static flow region of the velocity
encoded images. The velocity noise in the same region was compared between
high- and dual-venc datasets for each patient (figure 3). In addition, 3D PC-MR
angiograms (PC-MRAs) were calculated and used as a basis for segmentation
(MIMICS, materialize, Belgium) of the aorta (and pulmonary vessels in whole
heart scans). 3D flow visualization by means of time-resolved pathlines and systolic
streamlines (Ensight, CEI, USA) were used as indirect assessments of velocity
noise. 2D analysis planes were placed at the aortic (Ao) root and arch adjacent
to the first aortic branch (see figure 2). 150 pathlines per time-frame were
emitted from the plane at the aortic root, and the number of pathlines
intersecting the downstream plane (arch) was measured (figure 4). In addition, 150
streamlines were emitted at peak systole from segmented PC-MRA volumes,
and side-by-side dual- and high-venc images for each patient (figure 2) were
graded on a scale from 0 to 2 (0=poor, 1=moderate, 2=good) based on
collinearity, streamline density, and overall image quality. Comparisons were
made between high- and dual-venc datasets acquired in the same scan.Results
Dual-venc 4D flow data was acquired with a scan time of 12.8±7.1 minutes.
Figure 2 depicts dual- versus high-venc streamlines and quality scores in two
patients. Velocity noise and
pathline quantification results are summarized in figures 3 and 4,
respectively. Velocity noise was significantly reduced in dual-venc
reconstructed images (49.6±1.7% reduction, p<0.001)
and the proportion of pathlines emitted from the aortic root reaching the arch
was significantly increased in dual-venc compared to high-venc data (162±89.6%,
p=0.01). Dual-venc streamline images scored a total of 72%, 153%, and 110%
higher than high-venc streamlines in collinearity, density, and overall image
quality, respectively (p<0.0001). Discussion and Conclusions
The findings of this study show that k-t GRAPPA accelerated dual-venc 4D
flow MRI can significantly reduce velocity noise and provide improved
visualization of arterial hemodynamics in patients with varying presentations
of congenital heart disease. Dual-venc acquisition successfully improved
visualization of flow patterns across heterogeneous anatomy in various clinical
phenotypes, (e.g. patent 6 with TGA causing high velocities in stenotic branch PAs
with lower velocities in the mid/distal PA, and patient 10 with BAV and high
velocity, helical outflow jets in the ascending Ao next to slower recirculation
zones). Future investigations will include optimization of dual-venc 4D flow
MRI and the corresponding reconstruction algorithm, for improved in-vivo quantification
and assessment of a wide variety of cardiac malformation hemodynamics.Acknowledgements
Grant funding by NIH R01
HL115828, K25 HL119608, and AHA 16SDG30420005.References
[1] Markl, M., et al., Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T:
Improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow.
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2007. 25(4): p. 824-831.
[2] Nett, E.J., et al., Four-dimensional phase contrast MRI with
accelerated dual velocity encoding. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
2012. 35(6): p. 1462-1471.
[3] Callaghan, F.M., et al., Use of multi-velocity encoding 4D flow MRI
to improve quantification of flow patterns in the aorta. Journal of
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2016. 43(2):
p. 352-363.
[4] Johnson, K.M. and M. Markl, Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry
with five-point balanced flow encoding. Magnetic resonance in medicine,
2010. 63(2): p. 349-355. [5] Schnell S, Wu C, Garcia F, Murphy I, Markl M, Intracranial k-t
Accelerated Dual-Venc 4D flow MRI. Proceedings ISMRM 2015, abstract 4543.