Arun Venkataraman1, Samuel B Tomlinson2, Steven Meyers3, Jeffrey J Bazarian4, and Jianhui Zhong5
1School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States, 2School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, 3Radiology, University of Rochester, 4Neurology and Public Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, 5Center for Brain Imaging, University of Rochester
Synopsis
Traumatic
brain injury (TBI) is a source of considerable cost to society. Measures have
been taken to increase awareness of possible injury, with safety precautions
following suit. Despite this vigilance, the possibility of underdiagnosis is a
reality. In this abstract, we seek to explain DTI-derived metrics and their
application in the clinical setting. Tract based spatial statistics (TBSS),
brain segmentation, and network analysis were applied to TBI and healthy
cohorts to derive metrics that could aid in the diagnosis of mild TBI (mTBI),
and provide a mechanism for quantification of severity and risk stratification.
Purpose
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a
pervasive cause of injury in the United States, with incidence increasing among
all age groups. Despite increased vigilance and improvements in safety, TBI
remains a major source of morbidity, contributing to 30% of all injury-related
deaths in the United States.1 Recent studies demonstrate the
considerable effects of repeated low-impact on neural connectivity and systems
integrity, even in the absence of clinically-diagnosed concussion.2 Against
this background, we seek an improved understanding of the acute structural
alterations following minor TBI (mTBI) among adolescent athletes with
clinically-diagnosed concussion using analyses of DTI-derived global, regional
and network parameters.Methods
In
this ongoing study, ten mTBI patients (mean ± SD age =18.0 ± 3.0 years,
range = 15 – 24 years) were evaluated approximately 2 weeks post-diagnosis of sports-related
concussion. Twelve age-matched healthy athletes (no concussion history)
constituted the control group. High resolution diffusion tensor
imaging (DTI) scans (2x2x2 mm^3 and 60 diffusion-weighted directions)
were collected alongside T1-weighted images (1x1x1 mm^3) on a 3T Siemens
Skyra scanner. DTI scans were processed using FMRIB Software Library,3
and T1-weighted images were used to segment subcortical structures in DTI
space. Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) were used to compare structural
measures between groups (Fractional anisotropy, FA; Mean diffusivity, MD;
scaled relative anisotropy, sRA; Volume fraction, VF; Lattice Index, LI; Gamma
variate, GV; Radial diffusivity, RD; Axial diffusivity, AD) (Fig. 1A-B). Probabilistic
tractography was performed on each individual using the Automated Anatomical Labeling
(AAL) atlas4 to seed voxels. Structural networks were derived using
AAL seeds (nodes) and probabilistic white matter tractography (edges) (Fig.
2A-B). A progressive edge thresholding procedure was used to characterize
network topology (i.e., node survival) (REF). Group comparisons were performed
using two-tailed student’s t-test, and Bonferroni-corrected p-values (p) were evaluated using a significance threshold of p < 0.05.Results
TBSS Analysis
TBSS was performed using a
generated FA skeleton (Fig 1A, green). Areas of white matter with significant
group differences in FA are shown (Fig 1A, red). Global FA and its derived
metrics (sRA, VF, LI, GV) were significantly reduced in the mTBI group relative
to controls (all p < 0.001) (Fig.
1B). Diffusivity measurements were increased among mTBI patients versus
controls (MD, AD p < 0.0001; RD p < 0.001).
Analysis of Subcortical Regions
No significant difference was
seen in the global brain measurements in any of the metrics. MD of the brain stem
and the left thalamus were significantly higher in the mTBI group (p < 0.0001), with a similar
relationship being seen with the RD metric (Brain Stem p < 0.001, Left thalamus p
< 0.0001). There was a significant increase in AD across the brain stem and
the right and left thalamus (p <
0.0001).
Network Analysis
A progressive thresholding
procedure was applied to individual network matrices to assess node dropout.5
Analysis of survival curves revealed increased node resiliency against
thresholding in the mTBI group compared to controls, suggesting altered network
topology (Fig 2C). The area between the curves was evaluated using a
non-parametric method (i.e., Functional Data Analysis6), yielding a
significant group difference (p <
0.0001) (Fig 2D).
Discussion
More sensitive measures of brain alteration
are needed in TBI. Global measurements of any kind are not altered in TBI;
however, measures utilizing white matter tracts and segmentation were more
useful in discriminating between the two groups. Furthermore, the network data
suggests that these changes are not primarily destroying tracts, rather there
seems to be redistribution that makes certain edges less likely to drop out
during thresholding. Further clinical implications are yet to be explored;
however, the data suggests that AD is a very sensitive marker for mTBI, as it
is increased significantly in all of the subcortical regions (Fig 1C) included
in analysis, as well as in global TBSS (Fig 1B). In addition, node survival
analysis (Fig 2C) showed a robust separation in the dropout between the two
groups that could potentially be used in clinical evaluation of a patient.Conclusion
Clinical metrics sensitive to
brain injury could serve to better tailor clinical protocols to individual
patients. Our results suggest that the combined use of segmentation, TBSS, and
tractography-based network analysis will help better understand the mechanistic
nature and clinical aspects of TBI.Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the NIH for the MSTP training grant, as well as the University of Rochester Medical Center.References
1. National
Vital Statistics System (NVSS), 2006–2010. Data source is maintained by
the CDC National Center for Health Statistics.
2.
Bahrami, Naeim, et al. "Subconcussive head impact
exposure and white matter tract changes over a single season of youth
football." Radiology(2016):
160564.
3.
Jenkinson, Mark,
et al. "Fsl." Neuroimage 62.2 (2012): 782-790.
4.
Tzourio-Mazoyer,
Nathalie, et al. "Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM
using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject
brain." Neuroimage 15.1 (2002): 273-289.
5.
Cao,
Qingjiu, et al. "Probabilistic diffusion tractography and graph theory
analysis reveal abnormal white matter structural connectivity networks in
drug-naive boys with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder." The Journal of Neuroscience 33.26 (2013): 10676-10687.
6.
Bassett, Danielle S., et al. "Altered resting state
complexity in schizophrenia." Neuroimage 59.3 (2012): 2196-2207.