Synopsis
This presentation will discuss MRI of incidental renal cystic lesions. The appearances of complex renal cysts and cystic neoplasms will be reviwed. The advantages of MRI will be highlighted . The approach to management and surveillance of complex renal cysts will also be discussed.Renal cysts are fluid-filled structures in the
kidney that are not continuous with the nephron or collecting system, believed
to originate from diverticuli of distal convoluted tubule or collecting
tubules, possibly due to weakening of basement membrane. Cystic renal lesions are
ubiquitous and seen in a wide spectrum of sporadic,inherited and systemic
diseases. Radiologists must be aware of the imaging appearances of cystic
lesions, understand their pathophysiology to make a diagnosis and provide optimal
recommendations regards management and follow-up imaging.The Incidence of sporadic cysts increases
with age: 0.2% from 0-18 yrs,20% from 20-40 yrs,33% from 41-60 yrs. Most simple
cysts grow slowly with time:3.9 mm per year for <50 yrs old,1.8 mm per year
for >50 yrs old. Some may involute and disappear over time. Risk factors
include : Increasing age, ESRD on haemodialysis,Polycystic kidney disease- both
autosomal dominant and recessive types,Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and tuberous
sclerosis. Occasionally detection of incidental cystic renal disease may
result in diagnosis of inherited cystic diseases if unrecognized previously.
The
vast majority are benign
simple cysts, but complex cystic renal lesions are not uncommon which can have
a wide differential diagnosis. The Bosniak classification system provides a
useful tool for categorizing, standardizing reporting and managing renal cysts, According to the current classification, lesions in category I correspond to simple cysts without septa or vegetations, with thin and smooth walls, and no contrast enhancement after the administration of intravenous contrast agents .Category
II includes cysts with
thin septations, minimally thick walls and fine
parietal calcifications,
and no contrast enhancement after intravenous contrast agent injection. Homogeneous hyperdense cysts ≤ 3.0 cm are included in this category. Lesions with irregular and/or thick septa, with course calcifications, and clear enhancement after intravenous contrast injection are described as category III . Category IV is reserved for lesions with septa or
walls with well-defined solid components that demonstrate contrast-enhancement
after
intravenous contrast injection.. Category I &II are considered benign and
managed conservatively. Category II-F corresponds to indeterminate lesions, which,
although not sufficient to indicate surgical exploration, suggest a
slight risk of malignancy. Category III & IV suggest a malignancy/ neoplasm
and are usually managed surgically. Cystic renal neoplasms include a heterogeneous of tumors such as
cystic RCC, multilocular cystic nephroma and more recently recognized mixed
epithelial stromal tumor (MEST). They can
often be difficult to differentiate on imaging as they have common
morphological features but have
differing implications for follow-up after resection. Uncommonly renal
infections such as pyogenic abscess or hydatid disease(Echinococcal disease)
may present as complex renal cystic lesions mimicking tumors and must be borne in mind .
MRI has been widely used in the
characterization of cystic lesions in kidneys and other organs, usually with
better performance than CT. MRI better demonstrates the presence of thin septa
in cystic lesions, in particular within cysts < 2.0 cm). The enhancement of
thin septa, described as capillary or hair-like enhancement, is much more
conspicuous at MRI than at CT, providing greater confidence in their detection and
for denying the absence of contrast-enhancement. Other advantage of MRI is the
identification of contrast-enhancement of internal septa within hemorrhagic cysts utilizing
subtraction techniques. Diffusion-weighted MRI has been suggested as an
adjunct to routine MR imaging and allows for indirect evaluation of tumor
cellularity. In complex cystic lesions, restricted diffusion in solid
components was shown to have a high positive predictive value for cancer
Guidelines for surveillance : Category I and II renal cysts,
do not require further imaging or follow-up. Patients in Category IIF, because
of the approximate 5% malignant risk, do require periodic imaging. (There is no
consensus or evidence based interval determined for follow-up imaging.)
Combination of ultrasound and MRI should be considered as follow-up for Bosniak
IIF and reduces the lifetime radiation dose (once the lesion has been
characterized by triphasic CT scan) in patients younger than 50 years.One
suggestion surveillance theme has been 6monthly imaging for at least 5 years.
For Category III (50% malignant risk) and category IV (75% to 90% malignant
risk), surgical excision is recommended.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Terada N, Ichioka K, Matsuta Y, et al. The natural history of
simple renal cysts. J Urol. 2002;167:21–23.
2.Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA.Radiology. Evaluation of cystic renal
masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification
system.2004 May; 231(2):365-71.
3.Weibl P1, Hora M, Kollarik B, Shariat SF, Klatte T. Management,
pathology and outcomes of Bosniak category IIF and III cystic renal lesions. World J Urol. 2015 Mar;33(3):295-300.
4.Rosenkrantz AB1, Wehrli NE2, Mussi TC3, Taneja SS4, Triolo MJ5.
Complex cystic renal masses: comparison of cyst complexity and Bosniak
classification between 1.5 T and 3 TMRI. Eur J Radiol. 2014 Mar;83(3):503-8.
5. Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S, et al. Diffusion-weighted
magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of primary solid and cystic renal masses
using the Bosniak classification. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:815–20.
6.Graumann O1, Osther SS2, Karstoft J3, Hørlyck A4, Osther PJ2.Bosniak
classification system: a prospective comparison of CT, contrast-enhanced US,
and MR for categorizing complex renal cystic masses. Acta Radiol. 2015 May 27.
7.Wood CG 3rd1, Stromberg LJ 3rd, Harmath CB, Horowitz JM, Feng C,
Hammond NA, Casalino DD, Goodhartz LA, Miller FH, Nikolaidis P. CT and MR
imaging for evaluation of cystic renal lesions and diseases. Radiographics.
2015 Jan-Feb;35(1):125-41
8.Hindman NM, Hecht EM, Bosniak
MA. Follow-up for Bosniak category 2F cystic renal lesions. Radiology. 2014
Sep;272(3):757-66.
9.Gabr AH, Gdor Y, Roberts WW,
Wolf JS Jr. Radiographic surveillance of minimally and moderately complex renal
cysts. BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(8):1116-9.
10.Whelan TF .Guidelines on the management of renal cyst disease.Can Urol
Assoc J. 2010 ; 4(2): 98–9.
11.Heilbrun ME, Remer
EM, Casalino DD, Beland MD, Bishoff JT, Blaufox MD, CourseyCA, Goldfarb S, Harvin
HJ, Nikolaidis P, Preminger GM, Raman SS, Sahni A, Vikram R, Weinfeld RM. ACR
Appropriateness Criteria indeterminate renal mass. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015
Apr;12(4):333-41.