CMR in Inflammatory Systemic Disorders
Andrew Taylor1,2

1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, 2BakerIDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia

Synopsis

Cardiac manifestations are frequently observed in many inflammatory systemic disorders. Identification of cardiac involvement is of high clinical importance, as in many instances a large proportion of the morbidity and mortality in systemic inflammatory diseases is due to cardiac complications, which if identified early may be amenable to therapeutic intervention. In order to simplify the protean cardiac manifestations observed in inflammatory systemic disorders, these diseases can be discussed under the general headings of sarcoidosis, connective tissue diseases, and hypereosinophilic syndromes.

Target Audience

Cardiac imaging physicians, particularly those involved with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging

Outcome/Objectives

To develop a greater understanding of the role CMR can play in the evaluation of cardiac pathology in patients with inflammatory systemic disorders

Cardiac manifestations of inflammatory systemic disorders

Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease characterised by non-caseating granulomata in affected organs. Cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis is present 20-30% of patients at post mortem studies in the US, and can complicate up to 60% of sarcoidosis cases in Japan, where it is responsible for up to 80% of deaths. Common clinical consequences are conduction disturbances, ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure. Whilst there is no gold standard for the diagnosis of cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis, CMR imaging has greatly enhanced the detection of cardiac involvement. The principle features detected on CMR are cardiac inflammation, and also cardiac scarring, which can also be used to guide specific therapies, such as immunosuppression or device therapy.

Connective tissue diseases

Considered within this group are a range of overlapping clinical syndromes, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory myositis and scleroderma. Cardiac inflammation has been observed in all these conditions with varying frequency; however the detection of myocardial inflammation with CMR has enabled earlier detection of cardiac changes that are often subclinical. In some instances, such as in patients with SLE, the rate of subclinical cardiac involvement may be significantly higher than that previously thought prior to the advent of CMR imaging, suggesting a potential role for early therapeutic intervention. However to date there are very limited data testing therapeutic interventions in any of these syndromes.

Hypereosinophilic syndromes

Hypereosinophilia can occur as a consequence of a broad range of aetiologies, including allergic and autoimmune, infective and haematological disorders, as well as in specific syndromes such as Churg-Strauss Syndrome. Characteristic features of cardiac inflammation in hypereosinophilic syndromes are endomyocardial fibrosis, particularly involving the ventricular apices, and ventricular thrombus formation, both of which are well evaluated with CMR imaging. In many instances patients achieve a very good response to immunosuppressive therapy.

Conclusion

Whilst a broad range of cardiac manifestations may occur in inflammatory systemic disorders, the recent application of CMR, particularly with respect to identifying myocardial inflammation, scar and cardiac thrombosis represent major advances in the early detection and therapeutic intervention in these diseases.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Silverman KJ, Hutchins GM, Bulkley BH. Cardiac sarcoid: a clinicopathologic study of 84 unselected patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Circulation 1978;58:1204-11.

2. Matsui Y, Iwai K, Tachibana T et al. Clinicopathological study of fatal myocardial sarcoidosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1976;278:455-69.

3. Vignaux O, Dhote R, Duboc D et al. Clinical significance of myocardial magnetic resonance abnormalities in patients with sarcoidosis: a 1-year follow-up study. Chest 2002;122:1895-901.

4. Schulz-Menger J, Wassmuth R, Abdel-Aty H et al. Patterns of myocardial inflammation and scarring in sarcoidosis as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Heart 2006;92:399-400.

5. Sadek MM, Yung D, Birnie DH, Beanlands RS, Nery PB. Corticosteroid therapy for cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review. Can J Cardiol 2013;29:1034-41.

6. Smedema JP, Snoep G, van Kroonenburgh MP et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1683-90.

7. Patel MR, Cawley PJ, Heitner JF et al. Detection of myocardial damage in patients with sarcoidosis. Circulation 2009;120:1969-77.

8. Greulich S, Deluigi CC, Gloekler S et al. CMR imaging predicts death and other adverse events in suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:501-11.

9. Nadel J, Lancefield T, Voskoboinik A, Taylor AJ. Late gadolinium enhancement identified with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in sarcoidosis patients is associated with long-term ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:634-41.

10. Birnie DH, Sauer WH, Bogun F et al. HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart Rhythm 2014;

11:1305-23.11. Judson MA, Costabel U, Drent M et al. The WASOG Sarcoidosis Organ Assessment Instrument: An update of a previous clinical tool. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2014;31:19-27.

12. Doughan AR, Williams BR. Cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart 2006;92:282-8.

13. Abdel-Aty H, Siegle N, Natusch A et al. Myocardial tissue characterization in systemic lupus erythematosus: value of a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach. Lupus 2008;17:561-7.

14. Puntmann VO, D'Cruz D, Smith Z et al. Native myocardial T1 mapping by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in subclinical cardiomyopathy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:295-301.

15. Kobayashi Y, Giles JT, Hirano M et al. Assessment of myocardial abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis using a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance approach: a pilot study. Arthritis Res Ther 2010;12:R171.

16. Puntmann VO, Taylor PC, Barr A, Schnackenburg B, Jahnke C, Paetsch I. Towards understanding the phenotypes of myocardial involvement in the presence of self-limiting and sustained systemic inflammation: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:528-35.

17. Lundberg IE. The heart in dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45 Suppl 4:iv18-21.

18. Allanore Y, Vignaux O, Arnaud L et al. Effects of corticosteroids and immunosuppressors on idiopathic inflammatory myopathy related myocarditis evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:249-52.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)