Synopsis
Large animal models are frequently used to develop new MRI pulse sequences, devices, or drug therapies. In addition, MRI and MRS studies in large animals can aid with the mechanistic understanding of many diseases. Recently, the use of spontaneous disease models in pets has been gaining traction for rapid translation from bench to bedside. Tricks and tips for both MRI in both traditional laboratory large animal and pets will be discussed.Overview
MRI in
large animals in clinical research typically refers to any animal larger than a
ferret or rabbit. In veterinary
medicine, dogs and cats are considered small animals whereas pigs, horses,
sheep, goats, and cows fall under the category of large animals. Unlike imaging in mice and rats, which are
typically performed on high-field, small bore MRI scanners, MRI on large
animals is routinely performed at clinical field strengths. In veterinary medicine, the bulk of diagnostic
MR imaging is neurological scans followed by musculoskeletal imaging. Because of the acoustic noise (1) and the need to prevent motion,
MRI scanning in large animals is usually performed under general
anesthesia. Inhalational anesthesia,
such as isoflurane or sevoflurane, is frequently performed using a ventilator,
which has the added advantage of providing a means to perform suspended
respiration or breath-holds by pausing the ventilator. However, one must recognize that suspending
the ventilator also suspends the anesthetic delivery. Thus, care must be taken not to perform
breath holds too frequently less the animal wakes up.
Anesthetics in Large Animals
Many
anesthetics can have profound effects on imaging studies. For instance, several groups have shown that
fMRI results can be vastly different in awake dogs versus anesthetized dogs.(2,3) In a similar
manner, inhalational anesthesia can cause vasodilation, which can affect
hemodynamic studies in the heart.
Physiological monitoring to assess patient anesthetic depth becomes more
important in anesthetized animals.
Fortunately, most MR-compatible stand-alone physiological monitors as
well as vendor systems that are used in human patients can be used in large
animals without major modifications.
Pediatric settings, if available, will usually give more reliable
waveforms than adult settings in most large animal patients.
Positioning
Depending on the animal size, standard receiver coils can often be used in
large animals. Brain scans can usually
be performed using the vendor head or knee coil. Because of the different conformation of the
head in most large animals, scan planes in the head will need to be
adapted. For instance, images acquired
in the axial plane may yield coronal brain scans. Many groups will scan large
animals other than non-human primates in the prone position, but our group has
also had good success using the supine position for all species. On the other hand, typical knee coils are not
very useful for imaging the knee or stifle in most quadrupeds. Flexible receive only coils that are wrapped
around the joint of interest can provide better coverage. For extremity imaging, positioning the animal
with the joint of interest down and the contralateral leg positioned away from
the coil will minimize motion of the joint from gradient switching and also
decrease the likelihood of wrap artifact from the non-imaged leg.
Differences Than Human MRI
Species differences from man must also be considered when planning experimental
models and imaging. For example, dogs
usually have thirteen thoracic vertebrae and seven lumbar vertebrate, but pigs
usually have fifteen thoracic vertebrae and six to seven lumbar vertebrae. (People usually have twelve thoracic and five
lumbar vertebrae.) In addition, the
spinal cord extends further in most quadrupeds than humans. Similarly, the number of liver lobes in
different species is distinct from humans. Moreover, the orientation of the
heart orientation in the deeper chest of most animals other than non-human
primates (NHPs) will require different orientations of the double oblique
planes relative to humans to obtain long and short-axis images and can make planning navigators in
the diaphragm challenging to avoid saturation bands in the heart.
Species Differences
Significant
variations may occur between species that must be considered in the choice of
animal model. The most classic example
is the degree of vascular collateralization in the heart with dogs having the
highest degree of collateralization relative to rabbits and pigs, who seldom
have any degree of collateralization. As
a results, reperfused, myocardial infarction models in dogs will demonstrate
drastically different contrast kinetics than in pigs on first, pass
contrast-enhanced imaging as well as late gadolinium enhancement. Because most large animals other than NHPs
have a complete Circle of Willis, complete ligation of the common carotid
artery will seldom cause a stroke.
Spontaneous Disease Models in Pets
The
newest wave in preclinical MRI studies for clinical translation is the use of
spontaneously occurring disease in pets as more relevant testing for new pulse
sequences, devices, and drug therapies. Due to the high degree of inbreeding in
domestic dogs and cats—especially in pure-bred lines, many diseases that are
prevalent in patients occur spontaneously in pets. Unlike transgenic mice where specific genes
are knocked in or knocked out to cause disease, the genetic mutations in dogs
and cats that leads to naturally occurring diseases is often highly variable or
not yet elucidated as in human diseases.
Presently, over 450 diseases are
recognized in domesticated dogs with over 360 of these diseases having
analogous disease in humans, including many types of cancer, heart disease and
metabolic diseases related to obesity.(4,5) Moreover pets with these diseases may
receive many concurrent medications akin to what occurs in our patient
population. These
models may prove to be better than our current models in which disease
conditions are artificially induced in laboratory animal species. In addition, dogs and cats are sufficiently
large enough to enable imaging with clinical MRI scanners to enable rapid
clinical translation.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Lauer
AM, El-Sharkawy AM, Kraitchman DL, Edelstein WA. MRI acoustic noise can harm
experimental and companion animals. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36(3):743-747.
2. Jia H, Pustovyy OM, Waggoner P, Beyers
RJ, Schumacher J, Wildey C, Barrett J, Morrison E, Salibi N, Denney TS,
Vodyanoy VJ, Deshpande G. Functional MRI of the olfactory system in conscious
dogs. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e86362.
3. Berns GS, Brooks AM, Spivak M.
Functional MRI in awake unrestrained dogs. PLoS One 2012;7(5):e38027.
4. Wayne RK, Ostrander EA. Lessons learned
from the dog genome. Trends Genet 2007;23(11):557-567.
5. Sargan DR. IDID: inherited diseases in
dogs: web-based information for canine inherited disease genetics. Mamm Genome
2004;15(6):503-506.