Synthetic MRI
Marcel Warntjes1

1Center for Medical Imaging Science and Visualization (CMIV), LinkΓΆping, Sweden

Synopsis

Synthetic MRI has been a long-standing dream in MRI, which recently gained more attention. Quantification techniques improve and access to clinical application becomes more facilitated. This lecture will explain the technique of synthetic MRI, its limitations and clinical impact.

Purpose

Synthetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging is based on one or more MRI acquisitions that measure the patient’s physical properties. Instead of acquiring images for direct interpretation an absolute quantification of the T1 and T2 relaxation times and the proton density PD is performed. Using the T1, T2 and PD values it can be calculated what the expected signal intensity of an MR acquisition would have been at any given setting of echo time TE and repetition time TR. Even an inversion pulse can be added in the calculation, with an inversion delay time TI. Doing this for all pixels will recreate, or synthesize, ‘normal’ T1-weighted, T2-weighted, FLAIR or Inversion Recovery images [1,2]. The advantage of synthetic MRI is that it translates the MR quantification maps to more familiar images, which will ease image interpretation. The image contrast can even be changed after the patient has left. Having access to quantitative MRI will benefit (automatic) tissue recognition, supporting quantitative follow-up. The purpose of this lecture is to explain the technique of synthetic MRI, its clinical application and to explore its limits and pitfalls. Examples will be provided for application in multiple sclerosis, dementia, hydrocephalus, cancer, cartilage assessment and cardiac infarction.

Theory

The most challenging part of synthetic MRI is obtaining the T1 and T2 relaxation and proton density (PD) maps [3-7]. Once these are measured the calculation of signal strength of a T1-weighted or T2-weighted synthetic image is given by

$$$𝑆=𝑃𝐷·exp(−𝑇𝐸/T2 )·(1−exp(−𝑇𝑅/T1))$$$

where TE is the echo time and TR is the repetition time. If an inversion pulse is added, to generate a synthetic FLAIR, STIR or any other inversion recovery sequence, the signal strength is given by

$$$𝑆=𝑃𝐷·exp(−𝑇𝐸/T2 )·(1−2·π‘’π‘₯𝑝(−𝑇𝐼/T1)+ 𝑒π‘₯𝑝(−𝑇R/T1))$$$

where TI is the inversion delay time. Since the calculation of synthetic images is a post-processing step the TE, TR and TI can be changed after the patients has left.

Results

Using synthetic MRI a radiologists has access to quantitative T1, T2 and PD values, conventional looking images and computer-aided tissue segmentation. Examples will be provided for clinical applications of synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis and dementia using brain volume estimation and lesion characterization, in hydrocephalus for ventricle volume measurement, in cancer cases for tumor characterization, in cartilage assessment of tissue properties and in cardiac infarction where changes in physical properties provide insight in severity of damage and edema.

Conclusion

The combination of improved technology and better clinical access currently provides synthetic MRI a window to enter the clinical arena.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements go to GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare and Siemens Healthcare for acquisition support and to the university hospitals of Linköping, Umea, Gothenburg, Stockholm and Cincinnati for providing material.

References

1. Riederer SJ, Lee JN, Farzeneh F, Wang HZ, Wright RC. Magnetic resonance image synthesis: Clinical implementation. Acta Radiol Suppl 1986;369:466-468.

2. Bobman SA, Riederer SJ, Lee JN, Suddarth SA, Wang BP, Drayer BP, MacFall JR. Cerebral magnetic resonance image synthesis. Am J Neuro Rad 1985;6:265-269.

3. Warntjes JBM, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, West J, Lundberg P. Rapid Magnetic Resonance Quantification on the brain: Optimization for Clinical Usage. MRM 2008;60:320-329

4. Neeb H, Zilles K, Shah NJ. A new method for fast quantitative mapping of absolute water content in vivo. NeuroImage 2006;31:1156-1168.

5. Deoni SCL, Rutt BK, Peters TM. High resolution T1 and T2 mapping of the brain in a clinically acceptable time with DESPOT1 and DESPOT2. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:237-241.

6. Deichmann R. Fast high-resolution T1 mapping of the human brain. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:20-27.

7.Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine JL, Duerk JL, Griswold MA. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature. 2013 Mar 14;495(7440):187-92

Figures

Example of synthetic MR imaging on a 3 year old child. Images can be synthesized that are very similar to conventional images such as a T2W, T1W and double IR. Based on the same data tissue characterization can be performed, to find e.g. CSF, grey matter or myelin.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)