Synopsis
Synthetic MRI has been a long-standing dream in MRI, which
recently gained more attention. Quantification techniques improve and
access to clinical application becomes more facilitated. This lecture will
explain the technique of synthetic MRI, its limitations and clinical impact.Purpose
Synthetic Magnetic Resonance
Imaging is based on one or more MRI acquisitions that measure the patient’s
physical properties. Instead of acquiring images for direct interpretation an
absolute quantification of the T1 and T2 relaxation times and the proton
density PD is performed. Using the T1, T2 and PD values it can be calculated
what the expected signal intensity of an MR acquisition would have been at any
given setting of echo time TE and repetition time TR. Even an inversion pulse
can be added in the calculation, with an inversion delay time TI. Doing this
for all pixels will recreate, or synthesize, ‘normal’ T1-weighted, T2-weighted,
FLAIR or Inversion Recovery images [1,2]. The advantage of synthetic MRI is
that it translates the MR quantification maps to more familiar images, which will
ease image interpretation. The image contrast can even be changed after the
patient has left. Having access to quantitative MRI will benefit (automatic)
tissue recognition, supporting quantitative follow-up. The purpose of this
lecture is to explain the technique of synthetic MRI, its clinical
application and to explore its limits and pitfalls. Examples
will be provided for application in multiple sclerosis, dementia,
hydrocephalus, cancer, cartilage assessment and cardiac infarction.
Theory
The most challenging part of synthetic MRI is obtaining the T1 and T2 relaxation and proton density (PD) maps [3-7]. Once these are measured the calculation of signal strength of a T1-weighted or T2-weighted synthetic image is given by
$$$π=ππ··exp(−ππΈ/T2 )·(1−exp(−ππ
/T1))$$$
where TE is the echo time and TR is the repetition time. If an inversion pulse is added, to generate a synthetic FLAIR, STIR or any other inversion recovery sequence, the signal strength is given by
$$$π=ππ··exp(−ππΈ/T2 )·(1−2·ππ₯π(−ππΌ/T1)+ ππ₯π(−πR/T1))$$$
where TI is the inversion delay time. Since the calculation of synthetic images is a post-processing step the TE, TR and TI can be changed after the patients has left.
Results
Using synthetic MRI a radiologists has access to quantitative T1, T2 and PD values, conventional looking images and computer-aided tissue segmentation. Examples will be provided for clinical applications of synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis and dementia using brain volume estimation and lesion characterization, in hydrocephalus for ventricle volume measurement, in cancer cases for tumor characterization, in cartilage assessment of tissue properties and in cardiac infarction where changes in physical properties provide insight in severity of damage and edema.
Conclusion
The combination of improved technology and better clinical access currently provides synthetic MRI a window to enter the clinical arena.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements go to GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare and Siemens Healthcare for acquisition support and to the university hospitals of Linköping, Umea, Gothenburg, Stockholm and Cincinnati for providing material.References
1. Riederer SJ, Lee JN, Farzeneh F, Wang HZ, Wright
RC. Magnetic resonance image synthesis: Clinical implementation. Acta Radiol
Suppl 1986;369:466-468.
2. Bobman
SA, Riederer SJ, Lee JN, Suddarth SA, Wang BP, Drayer BP, MacFall JR. Cerebral
magnetic resonance image synthesis. Am J Neuro Rad 1985;6:265-269.
3. Warntjes JBM, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, West J,
Lundberg P. Rapid Magnetic Resonance Quantification on the brain: Optimization
for Clinical Usage. MRM 2008;60:320-329
4. Neeb
H, Zilles K, Shah NJ. A new method for fast quantitative mapping of
absolute water content in vivo. NeuroImage 2006;31:1156-1168.
5. Deoni
SCL, Rutt BK, Peters TM. High resolution T1 and
T2 mapping of the brain in a clinically acceptable time with
DESPOT1 and DESPOT2. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:237-241.
6. Deichmann R. Fast high-resolution T1
mapping of the human brain. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:20-27.
7.Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine
JL, Duerk JL, Griswold MA. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature. 2013 Mar
14;495(7440):187-92