Synopsis
Highlights:
RF coils are an essential part of a MRI system to excite and
receive MR signals. Their performance is very important for the quality of MR
imaging.
· Volume
coils provide relatively uniform sensitivity over a large volume.
· Surface
coils are designed to maximize SNR and enable parallel imaging
· Volume
coils and surface coils usually work together in the RF system to optimize the
RF excitation and reception performances at the same time
· Decoupling technologies are needed in the
design to minimize coupling between transmit and receive coil elements
Syllabus
Target Audience:
RF
researchers and clinicians who want to understand RF coils in MRI systems
Objectives:
Attendees
will learn basics design methods and criterions of volume coils and surface
coils used in MRI systems, and challenges encountered in creating homogeneous
excitation, especially for body imaging with high and ultra-high field MRI
systems, and existing solutions.
Introduction: RF
coils are a front-end component that is required for spin excitation and MR
signal reception in MRI systems. RF volume coils or surface coils are resonant at
specific MR working frequencies. Volume coils are designed to create a uniform
RF excitation within the imaging volume and surface coils are designed to
maximize SNR of the RF reception and enable parallel imaging. In order to
achieve optimal RF excitation and reception at the same time, usually the
volume and surface coils are incorporated in one design, wherein the volume
coil works as the transmit coil, and the surface coils work as the receive
coils. In order to minimize the interference between the transmit and receive
coils, decoupling technologies are needed to minimize coupling between the transmit
and receive coil elements. In the course, we will discuss the principles and
design methods of the volume and surface coils, as well as the decoupling
technologies.
Volume coils: the
volume coil is usually a cavity resonator having several electromagnetic modes,
and the mode at the MRI working frequency is able to create a uniform
excitation in an imaging volume. The most well-known cavity resonator used in
MRI systems is the birdcage resonator invented by Hayes et al. (1). There are three types of birdcage resonators:
lowpass birdcage, highpass birdcage and bandpass birdcage, we will go over the designs
and mode structures of these three types of birdcage resonators and their
applications in different MRI systems. Birdcage resonators have been widely
used as body coils in 1.5T and 3T commercial MRI systems. The operating
frequencies of body-size birdcage resonators, however, are lower than 300MHz/7T
because the structure becomes self-resonant. Another cavity resonator, the TEM
resonator invented by Vaughan et al. (2) was demonstrated to be able to extend
the range of operation of a body-size resonator up to 300MHz, and we will go
over the theory of the TEM resonator and its mode structures.
Surface coils the
surface coil is a LC circuit resonating at a working frequency of the MRI
system, it was first introduced by Ackerman (3), and extended to an array by
Roemer (4). The surface coil is usually used as a receive coil in the MRI
system. The main object of a receive coil is to maximize SNR. Therefore, minimizing
coil losses, such as conductive loss,
radiative loss and component loss, is important in the receive coil design. We
will discuss methods to minimize the coil losses. Moreover, with the
development of parallel imaging, multi-channel receive arrays gained more and
more attention. A 96ch 3T head coil built by Wiggins et al (5) demonstrated to
have a good performance with 3×3 acceleration. However, more coils covering a
same region of interest means smaller coils, and more conductive and component
losses. We will discuss how to balance the coil losses and the number of coil elements.
At 7T and above, the body size is comparable to the wavelength, more and more
far-field detectors such as dipoles were introduced in the high-field MRI
systems as RF coils in recent years. We will go over these far-field detectors
and their potential applications in the MRI systems and challenges.
Conclusion: Volume
coils can generate homogeneous transmit field in the imaging volume but cannot
provide sufficient SNR in most cases, while surface coils can provide high SNR
but suffer from field inhomogeneity. A combination of these two types of coils
can provide optimal excitation and reception at the same time.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
References
(1) C. E. Hayes, W. A. Edelstein, J. F. Schenck, O. M. Mueller, and M. Eash, "An Efficient, Highly Homogeneous Radiofrequency Coil for Whole-Body NMR Imaging at 1.5T," J Magn Reson Med, vol. 63, pp. 622-628, 1985.
(2) J. T. Vaughan, H. P. Hetherington, J. G. Harrison, J. O. Otu, J. W. Pan, P. J. Noa, and G. M. Pohost, "High frequency coils for clincial nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.," Phys Med IX, vol. 147, p. 147, 1993
(3) J. J. H. Ackerman, T. H. Grove, G. G. Wang, D. G. Gadian, and G. K. Radda, "Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils," Nature, vol. 283, pp. 167-170, 1980
(4) P. B. Roemer, W. A. Edelstein, C. E. Hayes, S. P. Souza, and O. M. Mueller, "The NMR phased array," Magn Reson Med, vol. 16, pp. 192-225, Nov 1990
(5) G. C. Wiggins, J. R. Polimeni, A. Potthast, M. Schmitt, V. Alagappan, and L. L. Wald, "96-Channel receive-only head coil for 3 Tesla: design optimization and evaluation," Magn Reson Med, vol. 62, pp. 754-62, Sep 2009.