Synopsis
Diffusion magnetic
resonance is a powerful probe into tissue microstructure. Theoretical
investigations commonly focus on establishing the relationships between
simplified environments with the magnetic resonance signal. In this talk, the essential
tools and a brief description of the building blocks of a comprehensive model
of diffusion taking place in tissue will be discussed. Main mathematical
approaches will be reviewed at some depth.Target Audience
Scientists with physics or
engineering background interested in modeling diffusion and understanding its
effects on the magnetic resonance signal.
Outcome / Objectives
·
The goal is to provide the basic tools and a
brief description of the building blocks for developing a comprehensive model
of diffusion taking place in complex media.
·
The audience will gain an overview of the
essential concepts and mathematical techniques employed.
Purpose
Within the timescale of
signal formation via a conventional magnetic resonance (MR) technique, spin
bearing molecules undergo random movements, which lead to variations in the
detected signal. Because such motion occurs on the order of several
micrometers, it is the microscale characteristics of the host medium that influence
the MR signal. Thus, diffusion MR is often interpreted as a means to overcome
the resolution limitation of conventional MR imaging. In principle, one can obtain
features of the underlying microstructure from the diffusion-attenuated MR
signal if adequate models of diffusion are employed. Because microscale features
are quite sensitive to changes associated with development, aging, and numerous
diseases, diffusion MR has been quite a powerful probe not only for basic
science applications but also as a diagnostic tool.
Methods
Most tissues feature extremely complex
architecture, making it difficult to come up with models featuring an
acceptable number of parameters that could be estimated from the acquired
signal. However, some features of the MR signal intensity, such as its
anisotropy, seem to be influenced primarily by cellular membranes, presumably
due to their restricting character [1]. This observation is important also from
a practical point of view as the assumption of restricted diffusion makes it
possible to parameterize the microstructure in terms of quantities such as cell
size, cell size distribution, membrane permeability, etc., which are extremely
relevant for the diagnosis and management of many diseases. In a commonly
employed approach, one describes the cells as cylinders and spheres. Though such
a description amounts to a substantial simplification of the host medium, it leads
to two very desirable consequences: tractable solutions and characterization of
the compartments via one or two parameters.
There are several experimental regimes for which
analytical solutions for the MR signal intensity have been obtained. For
Stejskal and Tanner’s conventional pulsed field gradient sensitization that employs
a pair of gradients [2], analytical solutions have been obtained for the case
in which the gradients are infinitesimally short [3]. However, this “narrow
pulse” regime cannot be realized in clinical acquisitions. Perhaps a more feasible
regime for the case of small attenuation (large signal), employs what is
referred to as the Gaussian phase approximation [4].
Studies in recent years have demonstrated the
potential of sophisticated gradient waveforms to provide novel information
inaccessible by traditional measurements. In fact, in the small attenuation
regime, the signal has been derived in terms of a straightforward integral
involving the time-dependent gradient waveform [5].
For the case of larger diffusion sensitivity
(lower signal values), the derivations tend to be considerably more cumbersome,
and one typically has to resort to semi-analytical or numerical techniques. Among
these, two approaches need to be mentioned. In the first case, an arbitrary
gradient profile is represented by a train of impulses [6] leading to the
multiple propagator technique. A matrix
product formulation of this technique has been introduced [7], which can be
considered a numerical evaluation of a path integral [5]. The second approach
also discretizes the time axis, representing an arbitrary gradient profile via
a piecewise constant function [8,9]. With the evaluation of some sophisticated
integrals, this approach also leads to a matrix product representation [10],
which has been generalized to the case of gradient waveforms that employ
gradients along multiple directions [11]. The relationships between the
multiple propagator and multiple correlation function techniques have been
investigated recently [12]. Despite their resemblance, the latter approach
leads to computationally more efficient implementations in the case of general
pulsed field gradients.
Discussion & Conclusion
Accurate inferences of microscale information
from specimens under examination demand theoretical developments that typically
employ sophisticated mathematical techniques. Significant advances have been
made in the past most notably in porous media research. Some of these
developments have been adopted to biomedical MR. With the ever increasing demand
for accurate diagnostic tools and technical developments that improve the
quality and speed of data acquisition, determination of microstructure via
diffusion MR is expected to be an active area with potentially significant
outcomes.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. C. Beaulieu, P.S. Allen, Water diffusion in the giant
axon of the squid: implications for diffusion-weighted MRI of the nervous
system, Magn. Reson. Med. 32 (5) (1994) 579–583.
2. E.O.
Stejskal, J.E. Tanner, Spin diffusion measurements: Spin echoes in the presence
of a time-dependent field gradient, J. Chem. Phys. 42 (1) (1965) 288–292.
3. P.T. Callaghan, Pulsed-gradient spin-echo NMR for
planar, cylindrical, and spherical pores under conditions of wall relaxation,
J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 113 (1) (1995) 53–59.
4. C.H. Neuman, Spin echo of spins diffusing in a bounded
medium, J. Chem. Phys. 60 (11) (1974) 4508–4511.
5. E. Özarslan, P.J. Basser, Microscopic anisotropy
revealed by NMR double pulsed field gradient experiments with arbitrary timing
parameters, J. Chem. Phys. 128 (15) (2008) 154511.
6. A. Caprihan, L.Z. Wang, E. Fukushima, A
multiple-narrow-pulse approximation for restricted diffusion in a time-varying
field gradient, J. Magn. Reson. A 118 (1996) 94–102.
7. P.T. Callaghan, A simple matrix formalism for spin
echo analysis of restricted diffusion under generalized gradient waveforms, J.
Magn. Reson. 129 (1) (1997) 74–84.
8. B.
Robertson, Spin-echo decay of spins diffusing in a bounded region, Phys. Rev.
151 (1966) 273–277.
9. A.V.
Barzykin, Theory of spin echo in restricted geometries under a step-wise gradient
pulse sequence, J. Magn. Reson. 139 (2) (1999) 342–353.
10. D.S. Grebenkov, NMR survey of reflected Brownian
motion, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 (2007) 1077–1137.
11. E. Özarslan, N. Shemesh, P.J. Basser, A general
framework to quantify the effect of restricted diffusion on the NMR signal with
applications to double pulsed field gradient NMR experiments, J. Chem. Phys.
130 (2009) 104702.
12. C. Yolcu and E. Özarslan, Diffusion-weighted magnetic
resonance signal for general gradient wa- veforms: multiple correlation function
framework, path integrals, and parallels between them, in Visualization and Processing of Tensors and Higher Order Descriptors
for Multi-Valued Data, ed. I. Hotz and T. Schultz, Berlin: Springer-Verlag
(2015) 3–19.