Synopsis
To review some basic
material on magnetic susceptibility in materials and biological tissues
- Magnetic susceptibility is a material property that
describes the degree of magnetization of a material when placed into an
external magnetic field
- Magnetic materials may be classified as diamagnetic,
paramagnetic, or ferromagnetic on the basis of their susceptibilities
- Tissue magnetic susceptibility can be anisotropic (e.g.
white matter)
- Tissue susceptibility depends on the composition and
microstructure of the tissue
- Susceptibility differences between tissues can be
utilized to enhance vascular and other features due to modulation of the MRI
signal induced by local phase shifts.
TARGET AUDIENCE
Scientists and
clinicians interested in understanding the fundamentals of magnetic susceptibility
and how it manifests in tissues.
Magnetic susceptibility is the physical quantity that describes the change of magnetization of a material in response to an applied magnetic field [1]. For isotropic, non-ferromagnetic (linear) materials, the magnetic volume susceptibility, χ, is defined by the linear relation
$$\overrightarrow{M}=\chi\cdot\overrightarrow{H}$$
where $$$\overrightarrow{M}$$$ is the magnetization or magnetic dipole moment per unit
volume, $$$\overrightarrow{H}$$$ is the applied magnetic field intensity and χ is a scalar quantity. Whereas in free space,
where there is no magnetization, the magnetic field can be described equally
well by the vector fields$$$\overrightarrow{B}$$$ or $$$\overrightarrow{H}$$$, which are linearly related by $$$\overrightarrow{B}=\mu_{0}\cdot\overrightarrow{H}$$$ and thus scaled versions of each other, in magnetized
matter the magnetic induction or magnetic flux density $$$\overrightarrow{B}$$$, and $$$\overrightarrow{H}$$$ are related by the equation
$$\overrightarrow{B}=\mu_{0}\cdot(\overrightarrow{H}+\overrightarrow{M})=\mu_{0}\cdot(1+\chi)\cdot\overrightarrow{H}$$
with $$$\mu_{0}$$$ being the magnetic permeability
of free space. Since both $$$\overrightarrow{M}$$$ and $$$\overrightarrow{H}$$$ have the same units (A/m), the volume magnetic
susceptibility is dimensionless. Introducing the relative permeability, $$$\mu_{r}=1+\chi$$$, the above relation can also be written as $$$\overrightarrow{B}=\mu_{0}\cdot\mu_{r}\cdot\overrightarrow{H}$$$.
In the general case,
magnetic susceptibility is orientation dependent with respect to an external
magnetic field and is then described by a symmetric second rank tensor $$$\widehat{\chi}$$$. Thus,
the magnetization may depart from the direction of the magnetic field. Anisotropic
susceptibility, which arises from asymmetry of orbitals or bonds has been observed
in different biological structures of various sizes including e.g., helical proteins [2], lipid bilayers [3], retinal rods [4], or muscle fibers [5]. From the tensor $$$\widehat{\chi}$$$
different parameters can be extracted, such as the mean magnetic
susceptibility $$$\overline{\chi}=\frac{1}{3}Tr(\widehat{\chi})$$$ or the axial magnetic susceptibility anisotropy $$$\overline{\chi_{aa}}=\chi_{11}-(\chi_{22}+\chi_{33})/2$$$.
In diamagnetic materials there are no magnetic
moments in the absence of an external magnetic field. Only in the presence of
an external field magnetic moments will be induced in the material and will create
a finite magnetization. The induced magnetic moments are opposite to the
inducing magnetic field (Lenz’s law), which means that the magnetic
susceptibility of diamagnetic material is negative (χ < 0). Diamagnetic
susceptibility is a generalized response of the orbiting paired electrons in a
sample to the magnetic field. Most tissues are diamagnetic with very small susceptibility
values. Due to the fact that diamagnetic susceptibility arises from the
reaction of electrons in their orbitals to the presence of the magnetic field,
this quantity is usually independent of temperature.
Molecules may possess a permanent magnetic dipole
moment, which typically arises from the presence of
unpaired electron spin and the associated magnetic moments. In an external
magnetic field these moments align in the direction of the applied field. The magnetic
susceptibility is thus positive (χ > 0) and
the paramagnetic response usually masks the weaker diamagnetic response of the
material. Pure diamagnetic tissue response can thus only
be observed if there are no magnetic moments present which is only possible, if
the sum of spin moments and orbitals moments vanishes, i.e. is zero. The
paramagnetic response of molecules to an external field is temperature
dependent and the response decreases with increasing temperature.
In ferromagnetism spontaneous magnetization occurs
below a material specific temperature even in the absence of an external field.
This is due to the quantum mechanical exchange interaction between permanent magnetic
moment, which leads to a spatial orientation of the moments. Exchange
interaction cannot be understood in classical terms, but is a consequence of
the Pauli principle and the Coulomb interaction of electrons. The order of magnitude
of this exchange interaction is typically in the range of 10 to 100 meV, which
is much larger than classical dipole interactions between permanent magnetic moments
that are on the order of 0.1 meV.
Tissue magnetic susceptibility
Magnetic susceptibilities of brain tissue are diamagnetic
and rather small, typically only ±20 % of the susceptibility of water ($$$\chi_{H_{2}O}=-9.05\cdot10^{-6}$$$ in SI units) due to the abundance of the latter in the human
body. The most important biophysical sources determining tissue magnetic
susceptibility in vivo are water, lipid content, myelin, iron, and calcium. Calcium in tissues (calcifications)
has substantially lower magnetic susceptibility than water. The susceptibility
of hydroxyapatite (Ca2+), for instance, has been measured with NMR and
found to be -14.83 ppm (6).
Iron
Iron can be a dominant paramagnetic contributor to
tissue magnetic susceptibility in vivo (1,7). Iron in tissue is either present
as storage iron (non-heme iron), such as ferritin and hemosiderin, or is bound
to hemeproteins, such as in hemoglobin (heme iron) (1,7,8,9,10). In the healthy
brain the total concentration ranges between 0 and approximately 200 µg/g
tissue [11,12]. Correlation studies of non-heme iron content in
deep gray matter nuclei using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) have
demonstrated strong correlations between magnetic susceptibility assessed by
QSM and known iron concentrations in the brain [13-16]. The magnetic properties
of hemoglobin, i.e. being paramagnetic in the deoxygenated and diamagnetic in
its oxygenated state with a susceptibility difference between completely
deoxygenated and completely oxygenated erythrocytes of $$$\triangle\chi_{do}=4\cdot\pi\cdot0.264 ppm$$$ [17] offers unique opportunities to probe oxygen
metabolism in blood and tissues. Since the magnetic susceptibility χ of blood
scales linearly with blood oxygen saturation Y, this enables non-invasive
estimation of Y based on magnetic susceptibility in the venous vasculature
[18-21].
Myelin
Myelin forms a compact multi-layered membrane by
wrapping itself tightly around the axon and is predominantly present in white
matter. It is a significant contributor to tissue magnetic susceptibility
having a special membrane structure with high abundance of lipids (e.g., phospholipids [$$$\overline{\chi}=-9.68 ppm$$$, $$$\overline{\chi_{aa}}= -1.13 ppm$$$] [22], sphingolipids
consisting of extremely long acids ranging from C18 stearic acid [ $$$\overline{\chi}=-10.03 ppm$$$, $$$\overline{\chi_{aa}}= -1.22 ppm$$$] [23] to C24 lignoceric acid), and proteins
[24] that overall render myelin more diamagnetic than water. The contribution of myelin to the measured bulk
susceptibility and its anisotropy has been demonstrated in a number of studies
[25,26] and the latter property has been exploited in susceptibility tensor
imaging to reveal white matter structure [27]. Reported values of susceptibility anisotropy in major fiber bundles determined from differences
between parallel and perpendicular oriented white matter fibers ranged between
0.012 ppm and 0.022 ppm [26,28,29]. Recently, the anisotropy of the magnetic susceptibility
of WM fiber bundles has been directly demonstrated experimentally by studying
and analyzing the torque that tends to orient human spinal cord samples in a
magnetic field in a direction that maximizes its magnetization [30].
Effects of tissue susceptibility on MRI
Susceptibility variations in tissue or susceptibility differences between
tissues due to different contributing constituents lead to spatial variations
in the magnetic field which affects both phase (or frequency) and signal relaxation
(R
2*) that can both be sensitively measured with gradient echo (GRE)
imaging. The resonance frequency shifts occurring in response to these magnetic
field variations offer then the possibility to extract information about the magnetic
properties of tissue and potentially its structure from the MRI phase although
this can become rather challenging due to the complexity of biological or human
tissue. In particular, tissue composition as well as tissue microstructure and
its orientation relative to the magnetic field will affect the MRI signal [31,32].
So-called structural anisotropy resulting from, e.g., orientation dependent frequency
(or phase) shifts in elongated structures as well as susceptibility anisotropy of
molecular tissue constituents (e.g. lipids in myelin) need to be considered and
possibly taken into account when applying MR techniques, such as quantitative susceptibility
mapping [13,14;19] or susceptibility tensor imaging [27], that aim to extract
and quantify tissue magnetic susceptibility.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in
magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second
kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-850. [2] Worcester DL.
Structural origins of diamagnetic anisotropy in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 1978;75:5475–5477. [3] Boroske E, Helfrich
W. Magnetic anisotropy of egg lecithin membranes. Biophys. J 1978;24:863–868. [4] Hong FT, Mauzerall
D, Mauro A. Magnetic anisotropy and the orientation of retinal rods in a
homogeneous magnetic field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1971;68:1283–1285.
[5] Arnold W, Steele R, Mueller H. On the magnetic asymmetry of muscle fibers.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1958;44:1–4. [6] Hopkins JA, Wehrli FW. Magnetic susceptibility
measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone. Magn
Reson Med 1997;37:494-500.
[7] Haacke EM, Cheng NY, House MJ, Liu Q, Neelavalli
J, Ogg RJ, Khan A, Ayaz M, Kirsch W, Obenaus A. Imaging iron stores in the
brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jan;23(1):1-25.
[8] Beard JL, Connor JR, Jones BC. Iron in the brain. Nutr Rev
1993;51(6):157-170.
[9] Hadzhieva M, Kirches E, Mawrin C. Review: iron
metabolism and the role of iron in neurodegenerative disorders. Neuropathol
Appl Neurobiol 2014;40(3):240-257.
[10] Ward RJ, Zucca FA, Duyn JH, Crichton RR, Zecca L.
The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol
2014;13(10):1045-1060.
[11] Hallgren B, Sourander P. The effect of age on the
non-haemin iron in the human brain. J Neurochem 1958;3(1):41-51.
[12] Hallgren B, Sourander P. The non-haemin
iron in the cerebral cortex in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurochem 1960;5:307-310. [13]
Wharton S, Bowtell R. Whole-brain susceptibility
mapping at high field: a comparison of multiple- and single-orientation
methods. Neuroimage 2010;53:515-525.
[14] Schweser
F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR.Quantitative imaging of intrinsic
magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain
iron metabolism? Neuroimage 2011;54:2789-807.
[15] Langkammer
C, Schweser F, Krebs N, Deistung A, Goessler W, Scheurer E, Sommer K, Reishofer
G, Yen K, Fazekas F, Ropele S, Reichenbach JR. Quantitative susceptibility
mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study.
Neuroimage 2012;62(3):1593-1599.
[16] Liu
M, Liu S, Ghassaban K, Zheng W, Dicicco D, Miao Y, Habib C, Jazmati T, Haacke
EM. Assessing global and regional iron content in deep gray matter as a
function of age using susceptibility mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec
23. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25130. [Epub ahead of print].
[17] Spees WM, Yablonskiy DA, Oswood MC, Ackerman
JJ. Water proton MR properties of human blood at 1.5 Tesla: magnetic
susceptibility,T(1), T(2), T*(2), and non-Lorentzian signal behavior. Magn
Reson Med 2001;45:533-542.
[18] Haacke
EM, Lai S, Reichenbach JR, Kuppusamy K, Hoogenraad FG, Takeichi H, Lin W. In
vivo measurement of blood oxygen saturation using magnetic resonance imaging: a
direct validation of the blood oxygen level-dependent concept in functional
brain imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp 1997;5:341–346.
[19] Haacke
EM, Tang J, Neelavalli J, Cheng YC. Susceptibility mapping as a means to
visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:
663–676.
[20] Fan AP,
Bilgic B, Gagnon L, Witzel T, Bhat H, Rosen BR, Adalsteinsson E. Quantitative
oxygenation venography from MRI phase. Magn Reson Med 2014;72:149–159.
[21] Wehrli
FW, Fan AP, Rodgers ZB, Englund EK, Langham MC. Susceptibility-based time-resolved
whole-organ and regional tissue oximetry. NMR Biomed 2016 Feb 26. doi:
10.1002/nbm.3495. [Epub ahead of print]. [22] Kawamura
Y, Sakurai I, Ikegami A, Iwayanagi S. Magneto-orientation of phospholipids. Mol
Cryst Liquid Cryst 1981;67:733-743.
[23] Lonsdale
K. Diamagnetic anisotropy of organic molecules. Proc Royal Soc Lond Series A
1939;171(A947):541–568.
[24] Stoffel
W. The function of oligodendrocytes in the maturation of the brain. In:
Schettler G, Greten H, Habenicht AJR (eds.) Cellular metabolism of the arterial
wall and central nervous system: Selected aspects. Springer Berlin Heidelberg;
2012, pp 55 - 76.
[25] Liu C, Li
W, Johnson GA, Wu B. High-field (9.4 T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by
quantitative mapping of magnetic susceptibility. Neuroimage 2011;56(3):930-938.
[26] Lee J, Shmueli
K, Fukunaga M, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyn JH. Sensitivity of MRI
resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107(11):5130-5135.
[27] Liu C. Susceptibility
tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63:1471-7.
[28] Wisnieff
C, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Wang S, Zhou D, Wang Y. Magnetic susceptibility
anisotropy: cylindrical symmetry from macroscopically ordered anisotropic molecules
and accuracy of MRI measurements using few orientations. Neuroimage
2013;70:363-376.
[29] Li X,
Vikram DS, Lim IA, Jones CK, Farrell JA, van Zijl PC. Mapping magnetic susceptibility
anisotropies of white matter in vivo in the human brain at 7 T. Neuroimage
2012;62(1):314-330.
[30] van Gelderen P, Mandelkow H, de Zwart JA, Duyn JH. A torque balance
measurement of anisotropy of the magnetic susceptibility in white matter. Magn
Reson Med 2015;74(5):1388-1396. [31] Wharton S,
Bowtell R. Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo
MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:18559-64.
[32] He X, Yablonskiy DA. Biophysical mechanisms
of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009;106:13558–13563.