Synopsis
In this educational presentation, the origins of magnetic
susceptibility induced signal anisotropy will be discussed. The observations of
magnitude and phase signal anisotropy in gradient echo have been reported in
the brain, heart, muscle and kidney. I will explain the sources (e.g.
microstructural anisotropy and susceptibility anisotropy) for the observed signal
anisotropy. Potential applications of the signal anisotropy will be discussed.
Introduction
In MR, tissue with anisotropic
micro- or molecular structure may yield signal variations (i.e. signal
anisotropy) that depend on the direction of a magnetic field applied to the
tissue. One of the well-known signal anisotropy is a diffusion signal in
diffusion tensor imaging measured in white matter of the brain (1). In this example, a voxel
with white matter fibers, which have anisotropic microstructure, generates
signal variations that depend on the relative orientation between the primary direction
of the fibers and the applied diffusion gradient.
Signal anisotropy has been
observed in several MRI contrasts applied in various structures in the body (2). Magnetic susceptibility is another
well-explored source for the signal anisotropy. For example, a long cylinder that
has magnetic susceptibility different from a surrounding medium generates magnetic
field both within and outside of the cylinder that changes by the relative
angle between the long axis of the cylinder and B0 field (3,4). If a voxel contains the
cylinder, the gradient echo signals (both magnitude and phase) of the voxel
will change as a function of the angle. Hence, a biological structure (e.g.
vein) that has a preferential orientation with magnetic susceptibility
different from surrounding tissue (e.g. paramagnetic deoxy-hemoglobin vs.
diamagnetic parenchyma) will demonstrate signal anisotropy in gradient echo
measurements. Similarly to the vein, other cylindrical structures such as axon,
skeletal muscle fiber, myofiber exhibit similar or more complex signal
anisotropy. In this talk, I will explain the origins of the signal anisotropy
in white matter, heart and muscle.
Origins of Signal Anisotropy
[White Matter] Different from
a simple cylindrical shape of a vein, a white matter fiber can be modeled as a
hollow cylinder that divides water space into axonal (innermost cylinder),
myelin (annulus), and extracellular water space (outside of hollow cylinder) (5,6). The magnetic susceptibility
source is located in the annulus where diamagnetic myelin exists. This
structural anisotropy with magnetic susceptibility of myelin induces a unique magnetic
field pattern that changes with the relatively orientation of the cylinder and B0
field (5-7). Interestingly, the signal
anisotropy of white matter is more complex than that from the simple hollow
cylinder because of the magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of myelin (i.e.
magnetic susceptibility of myelin changes its value depending on the direction
of the B0 field relatively to the orientation of lipid bilayers in myelin (8,9)). Additionally, a shorter T2 or
T2* in myelin water as compared to axonal and extracellular water further complicates
signal evolutions (10,11). When all of these factors
are combined, the magnitude and phase of each water pool show unique signal characteristics
that various as a function of the angle between the fiber and B0 field. The
resulting GRE magnitude and phase signals from a voxel that encloses the myelinated
fibers contain rich information of such sources (6,12). It has been demonstrated
that some of the information (e.g. myelin susceptibility value and myelin water
volume) can be extracted from the signal anisotropy measurements (6,9,13).
[Heart and Muscle] Similarly
to the myelin in white matter, muscle, both skeletal muscle (14) and myocardium (15), has been demonstrated to
possess susceptibility anisotropy. The muscle contains an alpha-helix peptide
bond structure, which is diamagnetic and has magnetic susceptibility
anisotropy. This anisotropy creates orientation dependent magnitude and phase
evolution and has been exploited to generate fiber orientation mapping of the
heart (15).
Applications and Complications
In white matter of the brain,
the magnetic susceptibility induced signal anisotropy has been utilized for
fiber orientation mapping (e.g. susceptibility tensor imaging using phase data (9), T2* orientation mapping
using magnitude data (16), and frequency difference
mapping using phase data (17)). It also helped to visualize
structures outside of the brain (e.g. myofiber orientation in the heart (15) and nephron structure in the kidney
(18)). These methods, however,
require multiple data acquisition at different object (e.g. head) positions
and, therefore, may have limited applications (e.g. high-resolution fiber
orientation mapping for ex-vivo samples). Recently, novel approaches that combine
the anisotropy measurement (e.g. T2* map) at a single orientation and the fiber
orientation map from DTI have been proposed to generate orientation dependent
anisotropy information (19,20). These approaches do not
require multiple orientation data and still utilize the signal anisotropy information
and, therefore, may have potentials for in-vivo clinical applications.
In addition to the direct
applications of the anisotropy, the knowledge gained in understanding the
signal anisotropy has been utilized. One example is myelin water imaging using
gradient echo data (10,13). The conventional gradient
echo myelin water imaging exploited T2* difference between myelin water pool
and axonal/extracellular water pool and had limitation in accuracy and
reliability due to proximity of T2* values between the pools (10). The phase characteristics
revealed by the signal anisotropy studies of white matter have suggested
distinct phase features of the myelin water pool (5,6) and has helped to improve
accuracy and reliability of the method (13).
When the signal anisotropy is
not properly modeled in susceptibility mapping, it becomes a source for errors
in estimating susceptibility values in quantitative susceptibility mapping
(ignoring susceptibility anisotropy and microstructural anisotropy) and
susceptibility tensor imaging (ignoring microstructural anisotropy) (12). These effects may influence
the reproducibility of the methods.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR
diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophysical journal
1994;66(1):259-267.
2. Henkelman RM, Stanisz GJ,
Kim JK, Bronskill MJ. Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues. Magnetic
resonance in medicine 1994;32(5):592-601.
3. Chu SC, Xu Y, Balschi JA,
Springer CS, Jr. Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of
compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magnetic resonance in
medicine 1990;13(2):239-262.
4. Schenck JF. The role of
magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic
compatibility of the first and second kinds. Medical physics
1996;23(6):815-850.
5. Wharton S, Bowtell R.
Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
2012;109(45):18559-18564.
6. Sati P, van Gelderen P,
Silva AC, Reich DS, Merkle H, de Zwart JA, Duyn JH. Micro-compartment specific
T2* relaxation in the brain. NeuroImage 2013;77:268-278.
7. He X, Yablonskiy DA.
Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
2009;106(32):13558-13563.
8. Lee J, Shmueli K,
Fukunaga M, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyn JH. Sensitivity of MRI
resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
2010;107(11):5130-5135.
9. Liu C. Susceptibility
tensor imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2010;63(6):1471-1477.
10. Du YP, Chu R, Hwang D,
Brown MS, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Singel D, Simon JH. Fast multislice
mapping of the myelin water fraction using multicompartment analysis of T2*
decay at 3T: a preliminary postmortem study. Magnetic resonance in medicine
2007;58(5):865-870.
11. MacKay A, Whittall K,
Adler J, Li D, Paty D, Graeb D. In vivo visualization of myelin water in brain
by magnetic resonance. Magnetic resonance in medicine 1994;31(6):673-677.
12. Wharton S, Bowtell R.
Effects of white matter microstructure on phase and susceptibility maps.
Magnetic resonance in medicine 2015;73(3):1258-1269.
13. Nam Y, Lee J, Hwang D, Kim
DH. Improved estimation of myelin water fraction using complex model fitting.
NeuroImage 2015;116:214-221.
14. Arnold W, Steele R,
Mueller H. ON THE MAGNETIC ASYMMETRY OF MUSCLE FIBERS. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1958;44(1):1-4.
15. Dibb R, Qi Y, Liu C.
Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of myocardium imaged by cardiovascular
magnetic resonance reflects the anisotropy of myocardial filament alpha-helix
polypeptide bonds. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official
journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2015;17:60.
16. Lee J, van Gelderen P, Kuo
LW, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyn JH. T2*-based fiber orientation
mapping. NeuroImage 2011;57(1):225-234.
17. Wharton S, Bowtell R.
Gradient echo based fiber orientation mapping using R2* and
frequency difference measurements. NeuroImage 2013;83:1011-1023.
18. Xie L, Dibb R, Cofer GP,
Li W, Nicholls PJ, Johnson GA, Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging of the
kidney and its microstructural underpinnings. Magnetic resonance in medicine
2015;73(3):1270-1281.
19. Hernandez-Torres E,
Wiggermann V, Hametner S, Baumeister TR, Sadovnick AD, Zhao Y, Machan L, Li DK,
Traboulsee A, Rauscher A. Orientation Dependent MR Signal Decay Differentiates
between People with MS, Their Asymptomatic Siblings and Unrelated Healthy
Controls. PloS one 2015;10(10):e0140956.
20. Denk C, Hernandez Torres
E, MacKay A, Rauscher A. The influence of white matter fibre orientation on MR
signal phase and decay. NMR in biomedicine 2011;24(3):246-252.