Tissue Anisotropy Origin (Brain, Heart, Muscle)
Jongho Lee1

1Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Synopsis

In this educational presentation, the origins of magnetic susceptibility induced signal anisotropy will be discussed. The observations of magnitude and phase signal anisotropy in gradient echo have been reported in the brain, heart, muscle and kidney. I will explain the sources (e.g. microstructural anisotropy and susceptibility anisotropy) for the observed signal anisotropy. Potential applications of the signal anisotropy will be discussed.

Introduction

In MR, tissue with anisotropic micro- or molecular structure may yield signal variations (i.e. signal anisotropy) that depend on the direction of a magnetic field applied to the tissue. One of the well-known signal anisotropy is a diffusion signal in diffusion tensor imaging measured in white matter of the brain (1). In this example, a voxel with white matter fibers, which have anisotropic microstructure, generates signal variations that depend on the relative orientation between the primary direction of the fibers and the applied diffusion gradient.

Signal anisotropy has been observed in several MRI contrasts applied in various structures in the body (2). Magnetic susceptibility is another well-explored source for the signal anisotropy. For example, a long cylinder that has magnetic susceptibility different from a surrounding medium generates magnetic field both within and outside of the cylinder that changes by the relative angle between the long axis of the cylinder and B0 field (3,4). If a voxel contains the cylinder, the gradient echo signals (both magnitude and phase) of the voxel will change as a function of the angle. Hence, a biological structure (e.g. vein) that has a preferential orientation with magnetic susceptibility different from surrounding tissue (e.g. paramagnetic deoxy-hemoglobin vs. diamagnetic parenchyma) will demonstrate signal anisotropy in gradient echo measurements. Similarly to the vein, other cylindrical structures such as axon, skeletal muscle fiber, myofiber exhibit similar or more complex signal anisotropy. In this talk, I will explain the origins of the signal anisotropy in white matter, heart and muscle.

Origins of Signal Anisotropy

[White Matter] Different from a simple cylindrical shape of a vein, a white matter fiber can be modeled as a hollow cylinder that divides water space into axonal (innermost cylinder), myelin (annulus), and extracellular water space (outside of hollow cylinder) (5,6). The magnetic susceptibility source is located in the annulus where diamagnetic myelin exists. This structural anisotropy with magnetic susceptibility of myelin induces a unique magnetic field pattern that changes with the relatively orientation of the cylinder and B0 field (5-7). Interestingly, the signal anisotropy of white matter is more complex than that from the simple hollow cylinder because of the magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of myelin (i.e. magnetic susceptibility of myelin changes its value depending on the direction of the B0 field relatively to the orientation of lipid bilayers in myelin (8,9)). Additionally, a shorter T2 or T2* in myelin water as compared to axonal and extracellular water further complicates signal evolutions (10,11). When all of these factors are combined, the magnitude and phase of each water pool show unique signal characteristics that various as a function of the angle between the fiber and B0 field. The resulting GRE magnitude and phase signals from a voxel that encloses the myelinated fibers contain rich information of such sources (6,12). It has been demonstrated that some of the information (e.g. myelin susceptibility value and myelin water volume) can be extracted from the signal anisotropy measurements (6,9,13).

[Heart and Muscle] Similarly to the myelin in white matter, muscle, both skeletal muscle (14) and myocardium (15), has been demonstrated to possess susceptibility anisotropy. The muscle contains an alpha-helix peptide bond structure, which is diamagnetic and has magnetic susceptibility anisotropy. This anisotropy creates orientation dependent magnitude and phase evolution and has been exploited to generate fiber orientation mapping of the heart (15).

Applications and Complications

In white matter of the brain, the magnetic susceptibility induced signal anisotropy has been utilized for fiber orientation mapping (e.g. susceptibility tensor imaging using phase data (9), T2* orientation mapping using magnitude data (16), and frequency difference mapping using phase data (17)). It also helped to visualize structures outside of the brain (e.g. myofiber orientation in the heart (15) and nephron structure in the kidney (18)). These methods, however, require multiple data acquisition at different object (e.g. head) positions and, therefore, may have limited applications (e.g. high-resolution fiber orientation mapping for ex-vivo samples). Recently, novel approaches that combine the anisotropy measurement (e.g. T2* map) at a single orientation and the fiber orientation map from DTI have been proposed to generate orientation dependent anisotropy information (19,20). These approaches do not require multiple orientation data and still utilize the signal anisotropy information and, therefore, may have potentials for in-vivo clinical applications.

In addition to the direct applications of the anisotropy, the knowledge gained in understanding the signal anisotropy has been utilized. One example is myelin water imaging using gradient echo data (10,13). The conventional gradient echo myelin water imaging exploited T2* difference between myelin water pool and axonal/extracellular water pool and had limitation in accuracy and reliability due to proximity of T2* values between the pools (10). The phase characteristics revealed by the signal anisotropy studies of white matter have suggested distinct phase features of the myelin water pool (5,6) and has helped to improve accuracy and reliability of the method (13).

When the signal anisotropy is not properly modeled in susceptibility mapping, it becomes a source for errors in estimating susceptibility values in quantitative susceptibility mapping (ignoring susceptibility anisotropy and microstructural anisotropy) and susceptibility tensor imaging (ignoring microstructural anisotropy) (12). These effects may influence the reproducibility of the methods.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophysical journal 1994;66(1):259-267.

2. Henkelman RM, Stanisz GJ, Kim JK, Bronskill MJ. Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues. Magnetic resonance in medicine 1994;32(5):592-601.

3. Chu SC, Xu Y, Balschi JA, Springer CS, Jr. Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magnetic resonance in medicine 1990;13(2):239-262.

4. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Medical physics 1996;23(6):815-850.

5. Wharton S, Bowtell R. Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012;109(45):18559-18564.

6. Sati P, van Gelderen P, Silva AC, Reich DS, Merkle H, de Zwart JA, Duyn JH. Micro-compartment specific T2* relaxation in the brain. NeuroImage 2013;77:268-278.

7. He X, Yablonskiy DA. Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009;106(32):13558-13563.

8. Lee J, Shmueli K, Fukunaga M, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyn JH. Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010;107(11):5130-5135.

9. Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2010;63(6):1471-1477.

10. Du YP, Chu R, Hwang D, Brown MS, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Singel D, Simon JH. Fast multislice mapping of the myelin water fraction using multicompartment analysis of T2* decay at 3T: a preliminary postmortem study. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2007;58(5):865-870.

11. MacKay A, Whittall K, Adler J, Li D, Paty D, Graeb D. In vivo visualization of myelin water in brain by magnetic resonance. Magnetic resonance in medicine 1994;31(6):673-677.

12. Wharton S, Bowtell R. Effects of white matter microstructure on phase and susceptibility maps. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2015;73(3):1258-1269.

13. Nam Y, Lee J, Hwang D, Kim DH. Improved estimation of myelin water fraction using complex model fitting. NeuroImage 2015;116:214-221.

14. Arnold W, Steele R, Mueller H. ON THE MAGNETIC ASYMMETRY OF MUSCLE FIBERS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1958;44(1):1-4.

15. Dibb R, Qi Y, Liu C. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of myocardium imaged by cardiovascular magnetic resonance reflects the anisotropy of myocardial filament alpha-helix polypeptide bonds. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2015;17:60.

16. Lee J, van Gelderen P, Kuo LW, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyn JH. T2*-based fiber orientation mapping. NeuroImage 2011;57(1):225-234.

17. Wharton S, Bowtell R. Gradient echo based fiber orientation mapping using R2* and frequency difference measurements. NeuroImage 2013;83:1011-1023.

18. Xie L, Dibb R, Cofer GP, Li W, Nicholls PJ, Johnson GA, Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging of the kidney and its microstructural underpinnings. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2015;73(3):1270-1281. 19. Hernandez-Torres E, Wiggermann V, Hametner S, Baumeister TR, Sadovnick AD, Zhao Y, Machan L, Li DK, Traboulsee A, Rauscher A. Orientation Dependent MR Signal Decay Differentiates between People with MS, Their Asymptomatic Siblings and Unrelated Healthy Controls. PloS one 2015;10(10):e0140956.

20. Denk C, Hernandez Torres E, MacKay A, Rauscher A. The influence of white matter fibre orientation on MR signal phase and decay. NMR in biomedicine 2011;24(3):246-252.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)