Synopsis
Different types of 2D MRS can offer different types of information to understand the complexities underlying pathophysiology of disease. Technical
developments specific to
2D method development and advanced post-processing
methods will allow for the
identification of biomarkers of
diseases at an early stage. Acceleration of signal acquisition, as well as
automated data processing algorithms are essential to introduce 2D MRS methods
into the clinic.Applications of 2D MRS: Brain & Body
Highlights
Different types of 2D MRS can offer different types of information to understand the complexities underlying pathophysiology of disease.
Technical developments specific to 2D method development and advanced
post-processing methods
will allow for the
identification of biomarkers of
diseases at an early stage.
Acceleration of signal acquisition, as well as automated data
processing algorithms are essential to introduce 2D MRS methods into the
clinic.
Target Audience
Imaging specialists and clinicians interested
in spectroscopy, MRS technologists, basic scientist and translational researchers interested
in learning of new methods to study in vivo metabolism.
Outcome/Objectives
The goal of
this talk is to discuss emerging 2D MR spectroscopy methods and their
application in the human body. Participants will be provided with a brief overview
of the emerging new methods ranging from promising approaches that may be
several years away from clinical use to novel development of existing
technologies that focus on addressing the unmet needs of patients.
Purpose
MRI has an unprecedented power in detecting a showing morphological and
structural changes inside the human body, with many new contrast mechanisms to
show difference between different types of tissue environments. MRI, however,
generates images based on signal arising from water or fat; the most abundant
species in the body. MRS, however, shows
the chemical makeup of tissue without the need to remove a biopsy. One–dimensional
(1D) spectroscopy has been around for more than 3 decades with important breakthroughs.
A shortcoming of 1D spectroscopy is the narrow spectral bandwidth (0-4.7)
leading to overlapping signals and subsequent analytical and processing
challenge. Two-dimensional (2D) was proposed to reduce the signal overlapping
that 1D suffers from and thus increase spectral sensitivity. Of course, three
is no free lunch, and 2D comes with its challenges of long acquisition times
and complex analysis. However, many advances in the field lead to the
increasing reliability of this emerging method. Therefore there is a strong need to develop new
techniques that are sensitive
to the underlying pathophysiological changes that occur
in disease and potentially to diagnosis conditions early on to allow for treatments. The purpose of this session is to learn
of different 2D methods and their application in the human body in vivo.
Methods
The first localized in vivo human brain 2D correlated spectroscopy (COSY) experiment was collected
in 1994, with an acquisition time of 102 min and region of interest (ROI) of
240 cm3 [1] on a 2 T whole body magnet. In 1995,
Ryner et al. implemented a J point-resolved
spectroscopy ( JPRESS) in the white matter of human brain in 27 min (ROI 27 cm3),
using a ‘‘90–180–t1–180–t1–ACQ’’ pulse sequence, where t1 is the incremental delay, and all RF pulses are
spatially selective [2]. A longer list of 2D methods followed
sooner after by the same authors [3]. Ziegler [4] and Thomas [5] implemented in vivo cosy in human brain at 3T
and 1.5T, respectively. The majority of current in vivo 2D data are collected on commercially available clinical
MR scanners at a field strength of 1.5 or 3 T, with some emerging at 7T [6, 7]. The COSY sequence
uses a minimum of three RF pulses (Figure
1), where the first
two RF pulses generate a spin-echo, and then the third RF, a 90 RF pulse, acts as a
spatially selective and coherence transfer pulse. A different 2D pulse sequenced
known as JPRESS, with a minimum of three spatially selective RF pulses applied
in the presence of slice-selective gradients along each of the three orthogonal
axes, is used to generate a double-refocused echo.
RF shapes can be sinc, Shinnar-Le Roux, adiabatic or any slice-selective
pulse with suitable spectral bandwidth. Even though the sequence localizes in a
single shot, a phase cycle that eliminates all signal except double-refocused
echo is recommended.
Processing of in vivo 2D MRS data
The raw matrix is usually linearly predicted to 1.5 its size in F1. This is followed by
zero filling to double the size of the linear-predicted data. Apodization with phase
shifted sine-bell squared functions along t1 and t2 is then applied before Fourier transform. The software package, known
as Felix [8] is used by many workers in this field,
and is equipped with suitable processing functionalities. L-COSY spectra are
usually asymmetrical about the diagonal due to the implementation of water
suppression, which partially suppresses resonances close to water frequency.
This in turn makes the process of coherence transfer between coupled spins
non-equivalent[4]. In the absence of water suppression,
L-COSY spectra are symmetrical.
ProFit (Prior-Knowledge
Fitting) [9] is a 2D MRS
fitting program with an approach that combines ‘linear combination of model
spectra’ (LCModel) [10] and ‘variable
projection’ (VAPRO) [11] methods. Thus,
the combination of frequency domain fitting with prior knowledge constraints as
well as a parameterized time domain fitting with linear and non-linear fitting
algorithms is implemented in ProFit. The ProFit software produces concentration
ratios to resonances in the spectrum, with Cramer-Rao lower bounds
(CRLBs). In addition, the number of identifiable and quantifiable metabolites
in human brain in vivo in ProFit is 17 compared to 8 in LCModel, mostly due to
data spread on another spectral domain in JPRESS [12].
ProFit was
first attempted [9] on a 2D JPRESS
phantom spectrum containing standard brain metabolites at physiological
concentrations [13].
Reproducibility was checked by acquiring the JPRESS data at different times on
a 3T scanner, and CRLBs were calculated for each fit yielding acceptably low
CRLBs.
In addition,
JPRESS and PRESS [14] data were
collected from 27 healthy volunteers to evaluate ProFit in vivo and to compare
to LCModel. The concentration ratios with respect to creatine, and the CRLBs
were calculated using ProFit and LCModel. Results obtained by ProFit were
slightly overestimated, probably due to macromolecular contamination.
Intra-subject variability, obtained by acquiring and analyzing data more than
one, was lower in ProFit than LCModel. Recently, in vivo data acquired with
L-COSY sequence [5] was analyzed
with ProFit and the resulting CRLBs compared to CRLBs obtained using JPRESS
sequence [15]. It was found
that the mean CRLBs are lower with L-COSY than with JPRESS.
Results/ Discussion
Human Muscle
Localized
1D MRS was applied successfully to human skeletal muscle in vivo to detect the
two lipid pools referred to as intramyocellular lipids (IMCL) and
extramyocellular lipids (EMCL) [16-19].
A typical L-COSY spectrum from healthy soleus of a male volunteer is shown in Figure 2. It was proposed by Schick et al that the
resonances from the lipids in the muscle spectra are seen as two signals due to
the geometrical arrangement and anisotropic susceptibility of these lipid
compartments [16].
Velan
et al. [18, 19] implemented
L-COSY in 10 volunteers and was able to determine IMCL/Cr and EMCL/Cr as 10.2±1.9 and 15.4±2.9, respectively. The measure of
unsaturation was achieved by measuring the ratio of the C2/C1, where C2 and C1
are volume of cross peaks due to diallylic and allylic protons, respectively.
The measure of unsaturation for IMCL and EMCL were 1.1± 0.11 and 0.87±0.12, respectively.
Thomas et al. [20]
used a STEAM-like pulse sequence, localized exchange spectroscopy with a long
mixing time to detect proton exchange between different molecular species or
fragments of the same molecule. Short tm values (<100 ms) did
not show exchange cross peaks.
Recently,
L-COSY was used to characterize lipids in soleus muscle and abdominal
fat in type 2 diabetes (T2D) [21]. Analysis of the soleus muscle 2D L-COSY spectral data showed
significantly elevated IMCL ratios with respect to Cr and decreased IMCL
unsaturation index in patients when compared to healthy subjects (P < 0.05). In T2D, Pearson
correlation analysis showed a positive correlation of IMCL/Cr with EMCL/Cr
(0.679, P < 0.05). Characterization of muscle IMCL and EMCL ratios,
unsaturation index, and abdominal fat, may be useful for the noninvasive
assessment of the role of altered lipid metabolism in the pathophysiology of
type 2 diabetics, and for assessment of the effects of future therapeutic
interventions designed to alter metabolic dysfunction in T2D.
In an attempt to reduce the effect of limited spatial coverage and long
acquisition times, faster and more covering methods were developed. A
significant reduction in the total scan duration using the multi-echo based
echo-planar correlated spectroscopic imaging (ME-EPCOSI) [22, 23] sequence was
accomplished using two bipolar readout trains with different phase-encoded
echoes for one of two spatial dimensions within a single repetition time (TR).
In agreement with an earlier report using single-voxel based 2D MRS,
significantly increased unsaturated pools of IMCL and EMCL and decreased IMCL
and EMCL unsaturation indices (UIs) were observed in the soleus and tibialis
anterior muscle regions of subjects with type 2 diabetes compared with healthy
controls. In addition, significantly decreased choline content was observed in
the soleus of T2D subjects compared with healthy controls.
1D and 2D MR correlation spectroscopy at 7T from human
soleus muscle were analysed
leading to T1 and T2 relaxation time constants due to their importance in sequence
design and spectral quantitation[6]. Additionally, the L-COSY spectra obtained from the soleus muscle
provided information on lipid content and chemical structure not available, in
vivo, at lower field strengths. All molecular fragments within multiple lipid
compartments were chemically shifted by 0.20-0.26ppm at this field strength. 1D
and 2D L-COSY spectra were assigned and proton connectivities were confirmed
with the 2D method.
Prostate
Due to the location of prostate gland in the body, MRS studies are usually
carried out with an endorectal coil as receiver and body coil as RF transmitter
to optimize SNR [26]. Metabolites such as polyamines (spermidine and spermine),
citrate, and creatine are prominent markers in healthy prostate whereas these
are reduced in malignant tissue and replaced by strong choline and lipid
resonances [27] and their
relative concentrations reflect disease and pathology.
Localized 2D JPRESS
was implemented on a 1.5 T whole body scanner [28]. The prostate
spectrum acquired from 2 cm3 voxel from a healthy volunteer showing
citrate, polyamines and lipid resonances was compared to a corresponding
spectrum from a benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer patients.
In BPH, spermine+spermidine levels remain high as does the citrate. In the 2D
spectrum from a prostate cancer, there is a sharp reduction in polyamines and
citrate, along with an increase of choline.
In 2006, Lange
et al introduced strong-coupling point-resolved spectroscopy (S-PRESS) sequence
which addressed the strong coupling of citrate and allows for an accurate
characterization of the citrate signal [29]. This can be
achieved by keeping TE constant but varying the two partial echo times TE1 and
TE2 simultaneously.
Preliminary
evaluations of 2D JPRESS, S-PRESS and L-COSY sequences have demonstrated
unambiguous detection of citrate, creatine, choline, spermine and more
metabolites in human prostates. Automated quantitation (e.g. ProFIT-based) of
JPRESS and L-COSY data clearly shows the superiority of 2D MRS over
conventional one-dimensional (1D) MRS. These sequences have been evaluated in a
small group of prostate pathologies and pilot investigations using these
sequences show promising results in prostate pathologies.
Recent advances on the temporal capability of
prostate metabolic scanning was achieved with echo-planar correlated
spectroscopic imaging (EP-COSI) as well as J-resolved spectroscopic imaging
(EP-JRESI)[30]. These methods reduce the long acquisition time required for spatial
encoding by using echo-planar
spectroscopic imaging (EPSI) technique combined with correlated spectroscopy to
give four-dimensional (4D) and the multi-echo (ME) variants. Further
acceleration can be achieved using non-uniform undersampling (NUS) and
reconstruction using compressed sensing. Reviews covering application of 2D in
prostate have been written by Ramadan [31] and Thomas [32]. The feasibility 2D MRS has been shown but a more systematic study on a
larger cohort, along with quantification of the cross peaks is required.
Human Bone Marrow
Many 1D spectroscopic studies reported that marrow lipid metabolism might
provide important diagnostic information for tumors [24]. A typical L-COSY spectrum from tibial bone marrow of
a male volunteer is shown in Figure 3.
Single voxel L-COSY and double-quantum filtered
(DQF)-COSY were implemented on a 1.5 T whole body magnet in healthy and
diseased tibial bone marrow [25]. Six healthy and six patients with acute leukemia were studied using
this technique. An unsaturated lipid proton
index, was obtained from the DQF-COSY by dividing the sum of all unsaturated
cross peaks in L-COSY by the (CH2)n diagonal peak, but was unable to
discriminate between healthy marrow and bone marrow in a leukemia patient.
Increased water content was detected in leukemia patients. It remains to be
seen if diagnostic information is available at the higher field strengths of 3,
4 and 7T.
Brain
In 2001, Thomas et al [5] reported L-COSY on a 1.5 T scanner with data acquired from the frontal and
occipital gray/white matter regions of healthy
volunteers. The data was acquired from a 27 cm3 region in 34
minutes.
In the same year, Ziegler et al [4] reported a similar experiment on a 3T whole body scanner with data
acquired from a similar voxel size in the left parieto-occipital lobe of a
healthy volunteer in about the same time. Cross peaks identified included
N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), aspartate (Asp), myo-inositol (mI), taurine (Tau),
glutamine/glutamate (Glx), Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and threonine (Thr). A typical brain L-COSY
is shown in Figure 4.
An in vivo
L-COSY spectrum acquired on a 3T magnet [33], shows (1) the
improved spectral resolution at 3T compared to similar spectra acquired at 1.5T
[5], (2) more
reliable detection of Glutathione (GSH), (3) better separation of cross peaks
close to diagonal, e.g. cerebral glucose (Glc)
and the cross peaks of NAA and Glx, (4) weaker effect of water suppression on
close-by peaks (e.g. NAA and GSH), and (5) better separation of threonine (Thr)
and lactate (Lac). L-COSY and JPRESS were aslo compared in the above work to realise that increased spectral width
along the new spectral dimension in L-COSY resulted in an improved spectral
dispersion enabling the detection of several brain metabolites at low
concentrations. Due to increased sampling rate, severe loss of metabolite
signals due to T2 during t1 was a major drawback of 2D JPRESS in vivo.
Two-dimensional J-resolved spectroscopy (JPRESS) in vivo was first
implemented in 1994 by Ryner et al [2, 3] on a 1.5 T magnet. More work followed [33] to produce a better quality JPRESS in vivo spectrum at 3T where NAA,
Glx, Asp, Cr, Cho and mI were identified.
In another study where L-COSY was used study the neurochemistry of
late-life depression [34], the mean [Cho]/[Cr] in a sample of 33 elderly subjects was found to be
higher in men than women by 10% (P < 0.05). Metabolites like mI,
phopshoethanolamine (PE) and Glx were also found to be higher in depressed
elderly females than controls, although these differences were not
statistically significant. Cerebral metabolites were also measured using L-COSY
technique in HIV-infected patients[35]. The concentration of mI and GABA were found to be elevated in the left frontal
brain of HIV-patients.
Watanabe implemented constant-time correlation spectroscopy for
simultaneous observation of glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and glutamine
in human brain at 4.7 T [36]. A constant delay of 110ms was used to produce
a decoupled F1 signal displaying the metabolites separately.
The use of gradient modulated constant
adiabaticity pulses for in vivo localization in correlated spectroscopy and
total correlated spectroscopy was first introduced by Andronesi et al [37] for accurate signal localization and lower
SAR. These methods were tested on patients with brain tumors on 3T clinical
platforms equipped with standard hardware.
Adiabatic version of COSY sequence, AL-COSY, was introduced to improve slice selection profile and reduce chemical shift artefacts [38]. It was shown that AL-COSY reduces chemical shift artefacts compared
with L-COSY and that slice profiles of adiabatic pulses were found to be
sharper and more symmetrical than those of traditional Mao pulses. Comparison
of 2D spectra obtained revealed spectroscopic peak volume improvements in
AL-COSY and less residual water.
L-COSY technique was also used used to compare the
biochemistry of the human brain to that of glioblastoma (GBM) [39]. Statistically significant differences were observed (P
< .05) between the cross peak volumes measured for healthy subjects and
those with GBM which include lipid, alanine, N-acetylaspartate,
gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamine and glutamate, glutathione, aspartate,
lysine, threonine, total choline, glycerophosphorylcholine, myo-inositol,
imidazole, uridine diphosphate glucose, isocitrate, lactate, and fucose.
For faster data collection sequences that cover wider regions in the
brain (i.e. multivoxel 2D COSY), four-dimensional (4D) multi-echo COSI (ME-COSI) was
implemented in human brain [22]. Diagonal and cross-peaks were identified from several brain
metabolites including N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), Ch, Cr, lactate (Lac),
aspartate (Asp), glutathione (GSH), and glutamine\glutamate (Glx) with
coefficients of variation (CV) in metabolite ratios across repeated
measurements were <15% for diagonal and <25% for cross-peaks observed in
vivo. This was followed by the implementation of correlation chemical shift imaging with low-power adiabatic pulses and
constant-density spiral trajectories [40]. This technique provides minimal chemical
shift displacement error, reduced lipid contamination from subcutaneous fat,
uniform optimal flip angles, and efficient mixing for coupled spins, while
enabling short repetition times due to low power requirements. An 8 x 8 single-slice 2D COSY dataset took 8:
32 min on 3 T clinical scanners, which makes it feasible for in vivo studies on
human subjects. In vivo COSY was also successfully used
to detect 2-Hydroxyglutarate in isocitrate dehydrogenase-Mutated
Glioma Patients, where false positives were obtained by using 1D method [41].
Recently Verma et al implemented L-COSY sequence in a human brain on a 7T
magnet [7], where they detected cross-peaks
from gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), isoleucine (Ile), lysine (Lys) and
Ethanolamine (Eth) were quantified, which are not readily resolvable with
conventional one-dimensional (1D) MR spectroscopy.
Breast
An L-COSY spectrum can be acquired from ~1 cm3 of breast
tissue (Figure
5). In vivo breast L-COSY was implemented on eight cancer patients and nine healthy volunteers to evaluate water to lipid (saturated and
unsaturated) ratio and to try to correlate this ratio with disease [42]. Three regions were studied; fatty, mixture of fatty and glandular and
glandular tissues. No choline resonances were detected in healthy tissue. A 2D L-COSY from a breast benign mass displayed
a more prominent water peak and weaker cross peaks of the olefinic protons,
when compared to the healthy spectra. Choline resonances where not observed in
the spectra from benign breast tumors. The L-COSY spectrum from a patient with
invasive ductal/adenocarcinoma showed an elevated water diagonal peak, reduced saturated and
olefinic lipid resonances, a prominent choline diagonal resonance at F1=F2=3.25
ppm, and a weak choline cross peak at (4.0, 3.5). The presence of choline and
the higher water/fat ratio in cancer patients than in healthy volunteers, is in
agreement with 1D spectroscopy results [43].
In 2005, a
statistical classification report on the diagnostic efficiency of breast L-COSY
in human breast carcinoma was published [44]. Significant
decrease of diagonal and cross lipid peaks volumes were observed in carcinoma
patients. Choline was only observed in spectra from the carcinomas. Reviews
summering application of 2D spectroscopy in breast was published recently [45, 46].
Cohorts with breast benign
masses, unclassified cancer, invasive ductal cancer and a healthy group were
studied with L-COSY [47]. Peak ratios to Pk2+Pk4 (the sum of cross
peaks between aliphatic and olefinic fat fragments) were found to be capable of
differentiating, with reasonable statistical significance, between different
types of pathologies.
A recent study by Ramadan et
al used L-COSY technique to study healthy versus BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers
[48]. Statistically significant peak ratios were
found (P>0.05, Mann-Whitney two-sided nonparametric test upon comparing data
from different cohorts, even though MRI showed no pathologic signs. Localized
COSY recorded significant changes in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations
when compared with control subjects. If these changes are ultimately proven to
be a premalignant stage, this method may prove useful in screening.
Conclusion
The progress of in vivo 2D MRS has been slow but steady and forwardly. Twenty
two years after the first 2D in vivo COSY was collected, the clinical
application of the technique is still in its infancy. There is no doubt about
the utility and usefulness of the technique, however, more development is
required to reduce the experimental acquisition time, expand coverage and
automate processing. The higher field strength magnets, now available for in
vivo studies are providing better spectral resolution and reducing scan time.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Brereton,
I.M., et al., Localized 2-Dimensional
Shift Correlated Spectroscopy in Humans at 2-Tesla. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, 1994. 32(2): p. 251-257.
2. Ryner, L.N.,
J.A. Sorenson, and M.A. Thomas, Localized
2D J-Resolved 1H MR Spectroscopy: Strong Coupling Effects In Vitro and In Vivo.
Magn. Reson. Imaging, 1995. 13: p.
853-869.
3. Ryner, L.N.,
J.A. Sorenson, and M.A. Thomas, 3D
Localized 2D MR-Spectroscopy on an MRI Scanner. Journal of Magnetic
Resonance Series B, 1995. 107(2): p.
126-137.
4. Ziegler, A.,
et al., Localised 2D correlation
spectroscopy in human brain at 3T. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics,
Biology and Medicine, 2001. 14: p.
45-49.
5. Thomas,
M.A., et al., Localized two-dimensional
shift correlated MR spectroscopy of human brain. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, 2001. 46(1): p. 58-67.
6. Ramadan, S.,
et al., In vivo 1D and 2D correlation MR
spectroscopy of the soleus muscle at 7T. J Magn Reson, 2010. 204(1): p. 91-8.
7. Verma, G.,
et al., Implementation of two-dimensional
L-COSY at 7 Tesla: an investigation of reproducibility in human brain. J
Magn Reson Imaging, 2014. 40(6): p.
1319-27.
8. Accelrys Felix NMR.
9. Schulte,
R.F. and P. Boesiger, ProFit:
two-dimensional prior-knowledge fitting of J-resolved spectra. NMR in
Biomedicine, 2006. 19(2): p.
255-263.
10. Provencher,
S.W., Automatic quantitation of localized
in vivo 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR in Biomedicine, 2001. 14: p. 260-264.
11. van der Veen,
J.W., et al., Accurate quantification of
in vivo31P NMR signals using the variable projection method and prior
knowledge. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1988. 6: p. 92-98.
12. Frias-Martinez,
E., et al. A Pilot Comparison of 2D and
1D MR Spectroscopic Quantitation of Metabolites in Healthy Human Brain at 3T.
in Proceedings of the International
Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2008. Toronto, Canada.
13. Govindaraju,
V., K. Young, and A.A. Maudsley, Proton
NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. NMR in
Biomedicine, 2000. 13(3): p.
129-153.
14. Bottomley,
P.A., Spatial localisation in NMR
spectroscopy in vivo. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1987. 508: p. 333-348.
15. Frias-Martinez,
E., et al. ProFit-based Quantitation of
Cerebral Metabolites using 2D L-COSY at 3T. in Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine. 2008. Toronto, Canada.
16. Boesch, C., et
al., In Vivo Determination of
Intra-Myocellular Lipids in Human Muscle by Means of Localized
'H-MRSpectroscopy. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1997. 37: p. 484-493.
17. Schick, F., et
al., Comparison of localized proton NMR
signals of skeletal muscle and fat tissue in vivo: two lipid compartments in
muscle tissue. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1993. 29: p. 158-167.
18. Velan, S.S.,
et al., Investigation of Muscle Lipid
Metabolism by Localized One- and Two-Dimensional MRS Techniques using a
Clinical 3T MRI/MRS Scanner. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007. 25: p. 192-199.
19. Velan, S.S.,
et al., Implementation and Validation of
Localized Constant-Time Correlated Spectroscopy (LCTCOSY) on a Clinical 3T MRI
Scanner for Investigation of Muscle Metabolism. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC
RESONANCE IMAGING 2007. 26: p.
410-417.
20. Thomas, M.A.,
H.K. Chung, and H. Middlekauff, Localized
Two-Dimensional 1H Magnetic Resonance Exchange Spectroscopy: A Preliminary
Evaluation in Human Muscle. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005. 53: p. 495-502.
21. Srikanthan,
P., et al., Characterization of
Intra-myocellular Lipids using 2D Localized Correlated Spectroscopy and
Abdominal Fat using MRI in Type 2 Diabetes. Magnetic Resonance Insights,
2012. 5(3380-MRI-Characterization-of-Intra-myocellular-Lipids-using-2D-Localized-Correl.pdf):
p. 29-36.
22. Verma, G., et
al., Implementation of multi-echo–based
correlated spectroscopic imaging and pilot findings in human brain and calf
muscle. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2011. 34(2): p. 262-269.
23. Furuyama,
J.K., et al., A pilot validation of
multi-echo based echo-planar correlated spectroscopic imaging in human calf
muscles. NMR Biomed, 2014. 27(10):
p. 1176-83.
24. Oriol, A., et
al., In vivo quantification of response
to treatment in patients with multiple myeloma by 1H magnetic resonance
spectroscopy of bone marrow. magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics,
Biology and Medicine, 2007. 20: p.
93-101.
25. Prescot, A.P.,
et al., Localized COSY and DQF-COSY 1H-MRS
Sequences for Investigating Human Tibial Bone Marrow In Vivo and Initial
Application to Patients With Acute Leukemia. Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Imaging, 2005. 22: p. 541-548.
26. Schnall, M.,
et al., MR imaging of the pelvis with an
endorectal-external multicoil array. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
1992. 2(2): p. 229-232.
27. Kurhanewicz,
J., et al., Combined Magnetic Resonance
Imaging and Spectroscopic Imaging Approach to Molecular Imaging of Prostate
Cancer. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002. 16: p. 451-463.
28. Yue, K., et
al., 2D JPRESS of Human Prostates Using
an Endorectal Receiver Coil. Magn. Reson. Med, 2002. 47: p. 1059-1064.
29. Lange, T., et
al., Prostate spectroscopy at 3 tesla
using two-dimensional S-PRESS. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2006. 56(6): p. 1220-1228.
30. Thomas, M.A.,
et al., Multidimensional MR spectroscopic
imaging of prostate cancer in vivo. NMR in Biomedicine, 2014. 27(1): p. 53-66.
31. Ramadan, S.
and C. Mountford, Two-Dimensional
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Biopsy and In Vivo, in Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy, G.A.
Webb, Editor. 2009, Academic Press: Burlington. p. 161-199.
32. Thomas, M., et
al., Two-dimensional MR spectroscopy of
healthy and cancerous prostates in vivo. Magnetic Resonance Materials in
Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2008. 21(6):
p. 443-458.
33. Thomas, M.A.,
et al., Evaluation of two-dimensional
L-COSY and JPRESS using a 3 T MRI scanner: from phantoms to human brain in
vivo. NMR Biomed, 2003. 16(5):
p. 245-51.
34. Binesh, N., et
al., Neurochemistry of Late-Life Major
Depression: A Pilot Two-Dimensional MR Spectroscopic Study. Journal of
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2004. 20:
p. 1039-1045.
35. Banakar, S.,
et al., Two-dimensional 1H MR
spectroscopy of the brain in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected
children. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2008. 27(4): p. 710-717.
36. Watanabe, H.,
N. Takaya, and F. Mitsumori, Simultaneous
observation of glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and glutamine in human brain
at 4.7 T using localized two-dimensional constant-time correlation
spectroscopy. NMR Biomed, 2008. 21(5):
p. 518-26.
37. Andronesi,
O.C., et al., Low-power adiabatic
sequences for in vivo localized two-dimensional chemical shift correlated MR
spectroscopy. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2010. 64(6): p. 1542-1556.
38. Ramadan, S.
and C.E. Mountford, Adiabatic localized
correlation spectroscopy (AL-COSY): application in muscle and brain. J Magn
Reson Imaging, 2011. 33(6): p.
1447-55.
39. Ramadan, S.,
et al., Use of in vivo two-dimensional MR
spectroscopy to compare the biochemistry of the human brain to that of
glioblastoma. Radiology, 2011. 259(2):
p. 540-9.
40. Andronesi,
O.C., et al., Correlation chemical shift
imaging with low-power adiabatic pulses and constant-density spiral
trajectories. NMR in Biomedicine, 2012. 25(2): p. 195-209.
41. Andronesi,
O.C., et al., Detection of
2-Hydroxyglutarate in IDH-Mutated Glioma Patients by In Vivo Spectral-Editing
and 2D Correlation Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Science Translational
Medicine, 2012. 4(116).
42. Thomas, M.A.,
et al., Volume-Localized Two-Dimensional
Correlated Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Human Breast Cancer. Journal
of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2001. 14:
p. 181-186.
43. Jagannathan,
N.R., et al., Volume localized in vivo
proton MR spectroscopy of breast carcinoma: variation of water-fat ratio in
patients receiving chemotherapy. Nmr in Biomedicine, 1998. 11(8): p. 414-422.
44. Thomas, M.A.,
et al., Two-dimensional MR spectroscopic
characterization of breast cancer in vivo. Technology in Cancer Research
& Treatment, 2005. 4(1): p.
99-106.
45. Mountford, C.,
et al., Proton MRS of the breast in the
clinical setting. NMR Biomed, 2009. 22(1):
p. 54-64.
46. Thomas, M.A.,
et al., Investigation of breast cancer
using two-dimensional MRS. NMR Biomed, 2009. 22(1): p. 77-91.
47. Ramadan, S.,
et al., L-COSY of breast cancer at 3T.
European Journal of Radiology, 2012. 81:
p. S129-S131.
48. Ramadan, S.,
et al., Lipid and Metabolite Deregulation
in the Breast Tissue of Women Carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genetic Mutations.
Radiology, 2015. 275(3): p. 675-682.