Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens1
1Forschungszentrum Juelich, Germany
Synopsis
The presentation will discuss, among others,
the diffusion tensor model and diffusion indices, acquisition and data sampling strategies, validation of DTI
and applications: tractography in neurosurgery, brain
connectivity in vivo, gray matter structure and connectivity in fixed tissue.Introduction
Molecular diffusion refers to
the random translational motion of molecules moving with thermal velocities - Brownian
motion.
During their random motion,
molecules probe tissue structure at a microscopic scale well beyond the usual
image resolution.
The dependence of the
molecular displacement on the measurement duration is defined by the Einstein
relationship:
<r2> = 6Dt ,
where t is the observation
(i.e. diffusion) time and <r2> is the mean squared displacement
of an ensemble of spins in three dimensions and corresponds to the variance of
the displacement distribution. The proportionality constant in this
relationship is D, the diffusion coefficient.
The Einstein relationship results
from characterizing molecular displacement in 3 dimensions by a Gaussian
probability of finding a given spin initially at point r1 between
positions r2 and r2+dr2 after a time interval
τD.
The Gaussian nature of this
distribution underlies the quantification of the diffusion coefficient with
NMR.
For a typical diffusion time of about 50 msec,
roughly the time scale of MRI diffusion encoding, water molecules sample the
brain tissue environment over distances of around 10 um. This is a considerable
distance at cellular scale, allowing molecules to interact with various tissue
components such as cell membranes, fibers, or macromolecules. Diffusion in
tissue is seldom ‘free’ on such long time and distance scales, but either
restricted or hindered. Several water compartments – possibly in exchange with
each other – will be present. Moreover, there are a variety of ways in which
water can be transported in biological systems.
However, assuming a Gaussian
propagator for diffusion – which is strictly correct only for free diffusion - allows
one to greatly simplify modeling the attenuation of the NMR signal following
its sensitization to diffusion by use of gradient pulses.
The attenuation is usually
described as S(b)=S0exp(-bD), where b is a factor depending on the concrete
experimental details and D is the molecular self-diffusion coefficient for e.g.
an isotropic liquid. In an unconfined liquid the diffusion coefficient would be
determined by its viscosity and the molecular size as well as temperature
(which governs Brownian motion).
But in biological tissue the
local diffusion reflects the complicated biophysical processes that dictate the
movement of water, such that the measured signal changes will reflect a
convoluted ‘apparent diffusion coefficient’ that can differ significantly from
the diffusion coefficient of the free (unrestricted) liquid.
Diffusion is truly a
three-dimensional process and molecular mobility in tissues such as white
matter in the brain is different for different directions.
Diffusion is encoded in the
MRI signal by using magnetic field gradient pulses and hence only molecular
displacements that occur along the direction of the gradient are visible. The
effect of diffusion anisotropy can then easily be detected by observing
variations in the diffusion measurements when the direction of the gradient pulses
is changed.
Diffusion anisotropy in brain
white matter originates from its specific organization in bundles of more or
less myelinated axonal fibers running in parallel.
Diffusion in the direction of the fibers is faster
than in the perpendicular direction.
This property was exploited
very early on in diffusion-sensitised MRI to map the fibre orientation in the
brain, assumed to be identical with the direction of fastest diffusion. Mapping fibre orientation with the
sophistication achieved nowadays has started with the introduction of the
diffusion tensor formalism by Basser et al. – DTI.
Several indices have been
derived from the diffusion tensor; the most widely used parameter of DTI is
fractional anisotropy, FA, representing the motional anisotropy of water
molecules. FA is sensitive to the presence and integrity of white matter fibers.
The possibility to track a fiber system
opened the field of
anatomical connectivity.
Tractography is prone to
error, some
inherent in the DTI model, and
since its advent,
considerable effort has been devoted to
validating its results.
Presentation
This presentation will
address in greater or lesser detail the following aspects:
- general properties of
diffusion (free/restricted/hindered,
temperature dependence)
- the diffusion tensor model
and diffusion indices (ADC, FA, axial and radial diffusivity,…)
- correlations of these
indices with other quantities reflecting tissue structure, either MRI-derived (myelin
water, magnetization transfer) or based on histology (e.g. cellularity)
- acquisition strategies
(single- and multi-shot acquisitions)
- data sampling strategies
(directions, b-value)
- validation strategies
(histology, phantoms)
- applications: tractography
in neurosurgery, brain connectivity in vivo, gray matter structure and
connectivity in fixed tissue
- what does DTI leave out?
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
Assaf Y. and Pasternak O. Diffusion Tensor
Imaging (DTI)-based White Matter Mapping in Brain Research: A Review. J Mol
Neurosci (2008) 34:51–61.
Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D.
Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J
Magn Reson B. 1994 Mar;103(3):247-54.
Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C.
Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by
quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B. 1996 Jun;111(3):209-19.
Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water
diffusion in the nervous system - a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002
Nov-Dec;15(7-8):435-55. Review.
Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C, Clark CA,
Pappata S, Molko N, Chabriat H. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and
applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Apr;13(4):534-46. Review.
Le Bihan D, Turner R, McFall JR. Effects of
intra-voxel incoherent motions (IVIM)
in steady state free precession (SSFP)
imaging: application to molecular diffusion
imaging. Magn Reson Med 1989; 10:324-337.
Carr HY, Purcell EM. Effects of diffusion
on free precession in nuclear magnetic
resonance experiments. Phys Rev 1954;
94:630-635.
Clark CA Le Bihan D. Water diffusion
compartmentation and anisotropy at high b values in the human brain. Magn Reson
Med 2000;44:852–859
Jones DK and Cercignani M. Twenty-five
Pitfalls in the Analysis of Diffusion MRI Data. NMR Biomed. 2010; 23: 803–820
Moseley M E, Cohen Y, Mintorovitch J, et al,
1990. Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of
diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy Magn. Reson. Med. 14 330–46
Moseley ME, Butts K, Yenari MA, et al.
Clinical aspects of DWI. NMR Biomed 1995; 8:387–396.
Sorensen AG, Wu O, Copen WA, et al. Human
acute cerebral ischemia: detection of changes in water diffusion anisotropy by
using MR imaging Radiology 1999;212:785–792
Stejskal EE Tanner JE. Spin diffusion
measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J
Chem Phys 1965;42:228–292
Thomas DL, Lythgoe MF, Pell GS, et al. The
measurement of diffusion and perfusion in biological systems using magnetic
resonance imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 45 (2000) R97–R138.
Tofts PS, Lloyd D, Clark CA, et al. Test
liquids for quantitative MRI measurements of self-diffusion coefficient in
vivo. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:368–374
Turner R, LeBihan D, Maier J, et al. Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion. Radiology
177, 407 (1990).