Multi-Band EPI Applications to fMRI
Prantik Kundu1

1Radiology and Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States

Synopsis

Multi-band EPI is becoming a standard acquisition scheme for functional MRI. Here we will evaluate how multi-band acceleration benefits fMRI. We will address how accelerating to increase temporal resolution leads to de-aliasing of nuisance physiological signals and supports resolving complex BOLD activity. In accelerating to increase spatial resolution, we will consider temporal signal-to-noise ratio losses due to high resolution, and how multi-band compensates through imaging more volumes. We will assess multi-band multi-echo fMRI, which incorporates T2* relaxometric techniques for susceptibility artifact compensation and thermal noise reduction. Lastly, we will review the multi-band EPI configuration of the Human Connectome Project and clinical translatability of its multi-band approach.

Overview and Acquisition

Multi-band EPI, in the blipped-CAIPI scheme, addresses critical limitations to fMRI resolution and fidelity from conventional EPI [1] by increasing imaging speed. In this educational talk we will review methods, benefits, costs, and variations of the multi-band approach. Multi-band EPI images multiple slices simultaneously by multiplexing excitations across interspaced frequency bands corresponding to target slices. The blipped approach adds alternating phase offsets to these slices from center in either direction by some fraction of field of view (FOV). Leveraging coil sensitivity maps, a multi-channel reconstruction with a GRAPPA or SENSE kernel then yields well-separated slice images. This strategy leads to a factor-N speed-up of volume acquisition [2]. Critically, partially overlapping slices are quite unique from each other, k-space lines are not skipped, and thus coils richly sample separable signals. Resultantly, reconstructed images are associated with low noise penalty (G-factor much lower than factor-N), enabling high factor-N accelerations [3]. In contrast, conventional fMRI in-plane acceleration of single-shot/slice/echo EPI, while also using SENSE/GRAPPA reconstruction, accelerates by skipping alternate k-space lines, and high-density receiver arrays sample signals of only one slice. This in-plane acceleration leads to approximately $$$\sqrt{N}$$$ noise penalty for less than factor-N speed-up, with N>2 leading to substantial losses. Thus, on its own, multi-band represents a critical innovation for accelerating fMRI and is a major advance over in-plane acceleration.

Temporal Resolution Considerations

We will review how increased temporal resolution is a key benefit of multi-band EPI. Conventionally BOLD signal is considered low temporal frequency, but greater temporal resolution is argued to better dealias/disentangle overlapping signals from cardiac and respiratory sources that are of higher frequency (than conventional EPI acquisition Nyquist) [4]. In the context of task fMRI however, the specific shape of hemodynamic response is known to be informative of pathological or pharmacological states, which is explained in higher frequency temporal components, and so faster sampling can be directly beneficial for characterizing BOLD [5]. In the context of resting state, with the increasing focus on dynamics [6], it is also important to realize that the capture of non-stationary transitions (spikes, sharp waves, etc.) also require high temporal frequencies for characterization, highlighting another benefit for temporally accelerated BOLD imaging.

Spatial Resolution Considerations

We will review spatial resolution considerations of multi-band EPI. For a fixed experiment duration, there are fewer total readouts, and more time can be spent per readout (i.e. slice-set), enabling higher spatial resolution. In this way multi-band EPI nominally enables high spatial resolution for fMRI, but important considerations are required on experiment design and analysis towards determining the optimal increase in spatial resolution. This is because fMRI sensitivity, calculated as temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR), scales linearly with voxel size. As especially relevant to SPM-style univariate analyses, multi-band EPI does not mitigate the increase in thermal noise associated with higher resolution (by sampling signal of a given voxel location less densely), and image smoothing to attenuate thermal noise obviates high-resolution acquisition and penalizes false discovery rate estimation. However, in multivariate decomposition, typified by independent component analysis (ICA), tSNR's fixed-point sensitivity measure is considered less relevant, and aggregate power tSNRx$$$\sqrt{N}$$$ for resolving signal components by (sparsity-weighted) statistical contrast is increasingly considered more relevant [7]. We will also consider how in the context of population studies, anatomical variation of the neural correlates of function sets an upper bound to the benefits of spatial resolution increases.

Multi-Echo Multi-Band fMRI

We will then review the more recent development of multi-echo multi-band (MEMB) fMRI, and analysis with multi-echo independent components analysis, in its own right and in relation to single-echo multi-band EPI. Multi-echo fMRI enables relaxometric assessments of BOLD signals, with benefits ranging from susceptibility artifact compensation, to thermal noise reduction without smoothing, to non-BOLD component removal, and time series output in dT2* units [8]. We will discuss how MEMB combines these benefits with additional ones: specifically determining the statistical dimensionality of total and BOLD spaces, isolation of thermal noise, and signal denoising (including slice leakage, cardiac/respiratory, GRAPPA artifacts) without template-matching algorithms such as FSL FIX, at 3T and 7T [9-11].

Human Connetome Project and Clinical Alternatives

Finally, we will review the multi-band acquisition strategy of the Human Connectome Project (HCP). After summarizing acquisition parameters and the current workflow, we will consider implications of the wider NIH objective of harmonization of neuroimaging with HCP-like protocols. In particular, it will be emphasized that HCP multi-band EPI parameters are designed with a noise tolerance based on 1-hour resting state acquisition [12]. In clinical or neurodevelopmental contexts, however, this strategy may be disagreeable, so alternative multi-band configurations will be considered.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Kundu is supported by the Brain Imaging Center (BIC) and Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute at Mount Sinai. Dr. Lara Marcuse of the Mount Sinai Epilepsy Program, Dr. Priti Balchandani of the 7T Program are also acknowledged here. Dr. Ben Poser and Dr. Essa Yacoub and the Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (Minnesota) are acknowledge for their efforts on multi-echo multi-band imaging.

References

[1] Setsompop, K., B. A. Gagoski, J. Polimeni, T. Witzel, V. J. Wedeen, and L. L. Wald. "Blipped CAIPIRHINA for simultaneous multi-slice EPI with reduced g-factor penalty." In Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting of ISMRM, Stockholm, Sweden, p. 551. 2010. [2] Mansfield, P. "Real-time echo-planar imaging by NMR." British medical bulletin 40, no. 2 (1984): 187-190. [3] Setsompop, Kawin, Borjan A. Gagoski, Jonathan R. Polimeni, Thomas Witzel, Van J. Wedeen, and Lawrence L. Wald. "Blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g-factor penalty." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 67, no. 5 (2012): 1210-1224. [4] Xu, Junqian, Steen Moeller, Edward J. Auerbach, John Strupp, Stephen M. Smith, David A. Feinberg, Essa Yacoub, and Kâmil Ugurbil. "Evaluation of slice accelerations using multiband echo planar imaging at 3T." Neuroimage 83 (2013): 991-1001. [5] Luchtmann, M., K. Jachau, C. Tempelmann, and J. Bernarding. "Alcohol induced region-dependent alterations of hemodynamic response: implications for the statistical interpretation of pharmacological fMRI studies." Experimental brain research 204, no. 1 (2010): 1-10. [6] Allen, Elena A., Eswar Damaraju, Sergey M. Plis, Erik B. Erhardt, Tom Eichele, and Vince D. Calhoun. "Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state." Cerebral cortex (2012): bhs352. [7] Smith, Stephen M., Christian F. Beckmann, Jesper Andersson, Edward J. Auerbach, Janine Bijsterbosch, Gwenaëlle Douaud, Eugene Duff et al. "Resting-state fMRI in the human connectome project." Neuroimage 80 (2013): 144-168. [8] Kundu, Prantik, Souheil J. Inati, Jennifer W. Evans, Wen-Ming Luh, and Peter A. Bandettini. "Differentiating BOLD and non-BOLD signals in fMRI time series using multi-echo EPI." Neuroimage 60, no. 3 (2012): 1759-1770. [9] Olafsson, Valur, Prantik Kundu, Eric C. Wong, Peter A. Bandettini, and Thomas T. Liu. "Enhanced identification of BOLD-like components with multi-echo simultaneous multi-slice (MESMS) fMRI and multi-echo ICA." NeuroImage 112 (2015): 43-51. [10] Salimi-Khorshidi, Gholamreza, Gwenaëlle Douaud, Christian F. Beckmann, Matthew F. Glasser, Ludovica Griffanti, and Stephen M. Smith. "Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers." Neuroimage 90 (2014): 449-468. [11] Boyacioglu, Rasim, Jenni Schulz, Nils CJ Müller, Peter J. Koopmans, Markus Barth, and David G. Norris. "Whole brain, high resolution multiband spin-echo EPI fMRI at 7T: a comparison with gradient-echo EPI using a color-word Stroop task." Neuroimage 97 (2014): 142-150. [12] Van Essen, David C., Kamil Ugurbil, E. Auerbach, D. Barch, T. E. J. Behrens, R. Bucholz, A. Chang et al. "The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective." Neuroimage 62, no. 4 (2012): 2222-2231.


Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)