Synopsis
MRA and phase contrast flow measurements involve the measurement of moving
bodies, specifically blood (or in some cases CSF). Motion will produces
artifact in MR images. While some of these artifacts are advantageous for the
purpose of MRA (TOF) and flow images, unanticipated motion will degrade the
quality of the exam. This educational section will discuss the practical considerations
and challenges when protocolling MRA and flow measurements.Overview
MRA and phase contrast flow measurements involve the measurement of moving
bodies, specifically blood (or in some cases CSF). Motion will produces
artifact in MR images. While some of these artifacts are advantageous for the
purpose of MRA (TOF) and flow images, unanticipated motion will degrade the
quality of the exam. This educational section will discuss the practical considerations
and challenges when protocolling MRA and flow measurements.
MRA
The
topics covered will include the discussion of the various challenges associated
with the 3 main MRA techniques: time of flight (TOF), contrast enhanced MRA
(CE-MRA), and phase contrast MRA. Within each of these topics, intra-voxel
dephasing, phase offsets, scan time optimization will be discussed. The use of
emerging techniques such as QISS will also be briefly discussed.
Phase
Contrast MRI
Beyond
the typical considerations, such as partial volume effects, venc selection, and
optimization of VNR, we will discuss the challenges associated with eddy
currents, phase offset errors, turbulence, and measurement of flow in small
vessels. Advanced implementation of 4D flow MRI will also be discussed in detail.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Hartung
MP, Grist TM, François CJ. Magnetic resonance angiography: current
status and future directions. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
2011;13:1-11
2. Dyverfeldt P, Bissell M, Barker AJ, Bolger AF,
Carlhall CJ, Ebbers T, Francios CJ, Frydrychowicz A, Geiger J, Giese D, Hope
MD, Kilner PJ, Kozerke S, Myerson S, Neubauer S, Wieben O, Markl M. 4D flow
cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement. Journal of Cardiovascular
Magnetic Resonance. 2015;17:72
3. Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, Flamm
SD, Fogel MA, Friedrich MG, Kim RJ, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Kramer CM,
Pennell DJ, Plein S, Nagel E. Standardized image interpretation and post
processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular
Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post
processing. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. 2013;15:35