Synopsis
Diastolic
dysfunction is a sensitive marker of cardiac disease and an important
cause of heart failure. MRI offers a variety of possibilities for the diagnosis
of diastolic dysfunction. MRI markers of diastolic dysfunction directly related
to structural remodeling are increased left atrial sizes or left ventricular
masses. Functional MR parameters of disturbed diastolic function include both
altered mitral inflow curves and pulmonary vein flow curves as well as
increased E/Ea values assessed by MR phase-contrast imaging. Furthermore, a
comprehensive regional analysis of diastolic ventricular motion and deformation
is enabled using MR Tagging, Tissue Phase Mapping or MR Feature Tracking. These
methods also allow the assessment of single motion/deformation parameters such
as untwist or long-axis strain-rate or velocities, as indicators of active
relaxation.Highlights:
About 50% of the patients with
heart failure suffer from predominant diastolic dysfunction.
Diastolic dysfunction is a
sensitive marker of cardiac disease.
MRI offers a variety of
structural and functional parameters in order to diagnose diastolic
dysfunction.
Target audience:
Clinicians (radiologists and
cardiologists) who wish to obtain a survey over the possibilities of diastolic
function analysis using MRI as well as physicists and engineers who want to get
a basic understanding of diastolic dysfunction and the clinical needs with
respect to this topic.
Objectives:
Normal
diastolic function and the patho-physiology of diastolic dysfunction will be
explained. The importance of diastolic function analysis for heart failure
patients will be highlighted. Furthermore, structural and functional MRI
parameters of diastolic function will be presented and their diagnostic value
will be discussed.
Problem:
Diastolic dysfunction is
characterized by an impaired active relaxation and/or passive ventricular
compliance resulting in an increase in intraventricular end-diastolic pressure.
Diastolic dysfunction often precedes reduced systolic function and is therefore
a sensitive marker of cardiac disease. Furthermore, diastolic dysfunction
accounts for up to 50% of all heart failure cases. The incidence of predominant
diastolic heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction is
increasing as the population gets older. Underlying diseases are hypertensive
heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, aortic valve stenosis or storage
diseases of the heart. In contrast to systolic heart failure, there is no
therapeutic strategy currently available which might improve the outcome of the
patients
1. One aspect contributing to this therapeutic dilemma is
the fact that the making of the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction is still
challenging. Usually the diagnosis is based on parameters derived from
echocardiography in combination with laboratory findings such as elevated BNP
values ². But echo-derived
parameters are limited by reduced reproducibility and high dependency on the
examiner as well as the acoustic window of the patient. In addition, diastolic
Doppler parameters are dependent on the Doppler angle and on loading
conditions. On the other hand, diastolic function analysis relies on a high
temporal resolution since the isovolumetric relaxation time, the time period of
active relaxation, is very short. Therefore there is an unmet need for imaging
methods providing robust and reproducible parameters of diastolic dysfunction
with adequate temporal resolution suited for multi-center studies evaluating
potential new therapies for diastolic dysfunction.
Methods and Discussion:
Cardiac
MRI offers various applications for the detection of diastolic dysfunction. MRI
is regarded as the gold standard for the quantification of left and right
ventricular volumes and masses. Raised left ventricular masses as well as
augmented left atrial volumes quantified by MRI directly reflect structural
aspects of diastolic dysfunction. An increased left atrial size may reflect raised left ventricular filling pressure and is associated
with heart failure
3 and increased mortality
4.
Furthermore, there are several functional MRI markers of disturbed diastolic
performance. A phase-contrast based assessment of mitral inflow and pulmonary
vein flow curves allows the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction and correlates
with Doppler echo values
5. Phase- contrast imaging of the
myocardial wall (Tissue Phase Mapping) enables the analysis of myocardial early
diastolic long-axis velocities with good agreement with tissue Doppler values
6.
Myocardial long-axis motion correlates with the early diastolic pressure decay
in the left ventricle
7. In analogy to echocardiography, the
combination of velocity- encoded MR measurements of early mitral inflow and
early diastolic long- axis peak
velocities of the myocardium (E/Ea value) is associated with invasively
measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressures as invasive marker of diastolic
function. In addition, a correlation
of the MRI values with E/Ea values based on echocardiography has been
demonstrated
8. Another MRI technique used for diastolic function
analysis is the calculation of peak filling rates from ventricular time-volume
curves. Reduced or prolonged peak filling rates are associated with
diastolic dysfunction
9. Ventricular time volume curves are calculated
from the cine short- axis slices used for volumetric assessment of the heart
without need for additional sequences. However, automated segmentation software
for the delineation of the endocardium in all cardiac phases is required. MR
myocardial Tagging, Tissue Phase Mapping or MR Feature Tracking allow for the
evaluation of regional parameters of diastolic function or untwist. It has been
demonstrated that reduced or prolonged diastolic long-axis velocities,
diastolic strain-rate or untwist are associated with diastolic dysfunction in
cardiac diseases
10 11 12. As well as long- axis motion
7,
untwist is also a left ventricular motion component associated with the
intraventricular pressure decay during active relaxation
13. MR
Tagging, Tissue Phase Mapping and MR Feature Tracking enable a comprehensive
regional evaluation of all ventricular motion components and segments during
diastole. Regional markers of diastolic dysfunction are promising in first
studies but their diagnostic and prognostic value has to be evaluated in
studies including more patients.
Conclusion:
Diastolic
function analysis is important but still challenging in daily clinical
practise. MRI offers an alternative to echocardiography providing structural as
well as functional imaging parameters of diastolic dysfunction. In addition to
the exact quantification of left atrial size and left ventricular mass, MRI enables a comprehensive and robust evaluation of
diastolic function including the assessment of
blood flow curves, peak filling rates or of three-directional regional
motion or deformation.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Mc Murray JJV et al. Eur Heart
J (2012) 33: 1787–1847
2.
Paulus W J et al. Eur Heart J (2007); 8:
2539-2550
3. Takemoto Y et al. Am J Cardiol (2005) 96: 832– 6
4. Moller JE et al. Circulation
(2003) 107: 2207-12
5. Rathi VK et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson (2008) 10(1): 36
6. Marsan
NA et al. Am J Cardiol (2008) 102: 1366–72
7. Oki T et al. Am J Cardiol (1997)
79(7): 921-8
8. Paelinck BP et al., J Am Coll Cardiol (2005) 45:1109–16
9. Kawai K et al. Circ: Cardiovasc Imag Nov (2009) 2(6): 476-484
10. Föll D
et al. Europ Radiol (2013) Feb 23(2): 339-47
11. Nagel E et al. Eur Heart J (2000) 21: 582–9
12. Edvardsen T et al. Am Heart J (2006)
Jan 151(1): 109-14
13. Dong SJ
et al. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2001) 281(5): H2002-9