Synopsis
Responsive contrast agents are a promising class
of molecules for visualizing disease-relevant molecular events. These contrast
agents undergo chemical changes in response to stimuli including enzyme
activity, metal ion transport, and changes in pH and oxygen levels. The
chemical changes lead to changes in contrast enhancement that can be detected
with MRI. This talk will cover the basic principles behind how this class of
contrast agents function and will highlight some published examples of
response.Highlights
Principles
of how responsive agents work will be discussed
Examples
of responsive agents will be discussed
Needs
for advancement of the area will be presented
Target audience
This talk will benefit researchers interested in
learning how responsive contrast agents for MRI work.
Outcome/Objectives
Because of the information presented, learners
will be able to understand the design principles that make responsive contrast
agents work and be made aware of some examples of stimuli responsive agents can
be used to detect.
Purpose
The purpose of this talk is to introduce the
topic of responsive contrast agents to listeners.
Methods
The talk will include a discussion of basic design
principles that are used to generate responsive contrast agents and describe
examples of responsive contrast agents from the literature.
Discussion
Responsive
contrast agents for MRI are contrast agents that change the level of contrast in
response to a stimulus. These agents are designed to chemically respond to a
desired stimulus resulting in a chemically modified agent that changes how it
enhances contrast relative to before the stimulus. The range of stimuli that
have been explored is wide and includes enzyme activity; changing temperature; transport
of biologically important metal ions including iron, calcium, and zinc; changes
in pH; and changes in redox environment including oxygen levels. The chemical
alterations to contrast agents that these stimuli impart include making or
breaking of covalent bonds, speeding or slowing of ligand or proton exchange
rates; changing the number or arrangement of ligands including water, causing
or disrupting aggregation, modification of electronic shielding or hydrogen
bonding of nearby atoms, and inducing binding to macromolecules. Each of these
chemical alterations has a direct impact on the extent to which the contrast
agent can influence contrast, and some of these alterations are reversible and
some are irreversible. Consequently, changes in contrast can be correlated to
chemical modifications of the contrast agents that are a direct consequence of
the molecular stimulus.
To
understand how responsive contrast agents work and how to design new responsive
contrast agents, it is important to know some basic coordination chemistry
terminology because the majority of responsive agents involve metal complexes.
Ligands are molecules that bind to metals. The binding can be thought of as a
Lewis acid–Lewis base interaction where the ligand is the Lewis base (electron
pair donor) and the metal is the Lewis acid (electron pair acceptor). The
denticity of the ligand describes how many times it is coordinated to the metal
ion. Denticity is important because there is often a relationship between
denticity and thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities, which have implications to
toxicity. Furthermore, some responsive contrast agents function because a
stimulus leads to a change in the denticity of the ligand and subsequent change
in contrast enhancement. For example, if a GdIII-containing complex
contains a substrate for an enzyme, and the substrate occupies a coordination
site of the GdIII ion, then after enzymatic cleavage of the
substrate, a coordination site will be opened that can be occupied by water.
The complex with one extra water molecule would be expected to enhance contrast
to a greater extent than the complex with the substrate. Thus, enzymatic
cleavage of the substrate would lead to an increase in contrast enhancement. Another
important coordination chemistry term is ligand exchange. Rapidly exchanging
ligands are referred to as labile, and slowly exchanging ligands are referred
to as inert. A change in ligand exchange rate induced by a stimulus, especially
if the ligand is water, can lead to a change in contrast enhancement.
In
addition to metal–ligand interactions, the way in which a metal complex
interacts with the environment can be used to influence responses. These
interactions can be described with correlation times specific to a paramagnetic
complex, and the correlation times can often be used to produce responsive
contrast agents. For example, bound water residency lifetime (the inverse of
water-exchange rate) and rotational correlation time impact the relaxivity (a
measure of the efficiency of a contrast agent) of paramagnetic contrast agents
for MRI. These correlation times can be altered by stimulus-induced changes to
ligands. For example, if a stimulus causes small paramagnetic complexes to
aggregate, that aggregation will increase rotational correlation time, leading
to increased relaxivity.
Another
aspect of paramagnets that can influence contrast is the oxidation state of the
metal or the ligand. Redox events in the ligand or metal can lead to changes in
the ability to influence contrast because more unpaired electrons tend to lead
to increased contrast enhancement. For example, the EuII ion
influences contrast to roughly the same extent as GdIII; however,
under physiological conditions, the EuII ion can be oxidized to the
EuIII ion that does not influence contrast to a measurable extent.
Therefore, prior to oxidation, complexes of EuII produce contrast
enhancement that disappears after oxidation of the metal ion. This change makes
EuII-containing complexes responsive to oxidation, and this response
was recently used to differentiate necrotic tumor tissue from non-necrotic
tumor tissue in mice.
In
addition to small single ion paramagnetic contrast agents, larger particles can
be turned into responsive contrast agents. For example, if iron oxide particles
are caused to aggregate based on changes to their surface coating, then the
aggregated particles will have a greater influence on contrast, making that
system a responsive contrast agent. Furthermore, the chemical features that
make chemical exchange saturation transfer agents produce contrast can be made
responsive to stimuli resulting in responsive contrast agents. Similar systems
can be designed for other nuclei, expanding the scope of responsive contrast
agents to include more than just 1H-MRI.
While
responsive contrast agents are promising, current limitations that present
opportunities for future research include low sensitivity (millimolar amounts
of agent are often needed), small changes in contrast enhancement level, and
delivery to specific areas of interest. Many research groups are working toward
addressing these challenging issues.
Conclusion
While not currently used in the clinic,
responsive contrast agents for MRI are relevant because they offer the
potential monitor physiologically important molecular events such as enzyme
activity or metal ion movement non-invasively. Tracking molecular events
associated with disease is likely to be important to the development of new
therapies and diagnosis of disease.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
For
reviews about responsive contrast agents, see the following articles:
Hingorani, D.
V.; Bernstein, A. S.; Pagel, M. D. A review of responsive MRI contrast agents:
2005–2014. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging
2015, 10, 245–265.
Ekanger, L. A.;
Allen, M. J. Overcoming the concentration-dependence of responsive probes for
magnetic resonance imaging. Metallomics
2015, 7, 405–421.
Tsitovich, P.
B.; Burns, P. J.; McKay, A. M.; Morrow, J. R. Redox-activated MRI contrast
agents based on lanthanide and transition metal ions. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2014,
133, 143–154.
Davies, G.-L.;
Kramberger, I.; Davis, J. J. Environmentally responsive MRI contrast agents. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9704–9721.
Sherry, A. D.;
Wu, Y. The importance of water exchange rates in the design of responsive
agents for MRI. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2013, 17, 167–174.
Shen, C.; New,
E. J. Promising strategies for Gd-based responsive magnetic resonance imaging
contrast agents. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2013, 17, 158–166.
Tu, C.; Louie,
A. Y. Strategies for the development of gadolinium-based ‘q’-activatable MRI
contrast agents. NMR Biomed. 2013, 26, 781–787.
Angelovski, G.;
Mamedov, I. Cation-responsive MRI contrast agents based on gadolinium(III). Curr. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 1, 76–90.
Hanaoka, K.
Development of responsive lanthanide-based magnetic resonance imaging and
luminescent probes for biological applications. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2010,
58, 1283–1294.
Que, E. L.;
Chang, C. J. Responsive magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents as chemical
sensors for metals in biology and medicine. Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 51–60.
Leon-Rodriguez,
L. M. D.; Lubag, A. J. M.; Malloy, C. R.; Martinez, G. V.; Gillies, R. J.;
Sherry, A. D. Responsive MRI agents for sensing metabolism in vivo. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 948–957.
Hyodo, F.;
Soule, B. P.; Matsumoto, K.; Matsumoto, S.; Cook, J. A.; Hyodo, E.; Sowers, A.
L.; Krishna, M. C.; Mitchell, J. B. Assessment of tissue redox status using
metabolic responsive contrast agents and magnetic resonance imaging. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2008, 60, 1049–1060.
Pérez-Mayoral,
E.; Negri, V.; Soler-Padrós, Cerdán, S.; Ballesteros, P. Chemistry of
paramagnetic and diamagnetic contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging and
spectroscopy pH responsive contrast agents. Eur.
J. Radiol. 2008, 67, 453–458.