Synopsis
This lecture will review the fundamental properties and applications of
relaxation based contrast agents. We will begin by understanding the physics of
relaxation and factors influencing it. With a view towards in vivo use, we will
discuss the relevant physicochemical and MR properties that influence the
success of relaxation based agents for biomedical applications. We will also discuss factors that determine
the pharmacokinetics of these agents and the
opportunity for targeting tissue microenvironment. Finally we will review some
new directions in the field outline future prospects.Target Audience
Ph.D. and M.D.
researchers with
an interest in molecular imaging concepts, applications
and clinical translation.
Outcome objectives
- Review basics of paramagnetic
relaxation theory
- Define r1
and r2 relaxivity
- Discuss factors important to design of relaxation based contrast agents
- Understand properties of T1, T2* relaxation agents for in vivo use
- Illustrate examples
of clinical relaxation based contrast agents
- Illustrate
examples of novel targeted relaxation
based contrast agents
Overview
MRI can be enhanced
by the use of contrast agents that enable better delineation of the abnormal
tissue from its surroundings and these are now used in the clinic for routine
examination of pathologies, particularly cancer. This lecture discusses
targeted
1H MRI contrast agents for application in cancer imaging. We
begin with an introduction to MRI and the mechanism of MRI contrast agents. We
then classify the contrast agents for
1H MRI into two categories
namely the “positive” contrast agents (appearing
bright on MR images) and the “negative” contrast agents (appearing dark on MR
images) and discuss the general properties that affect the sensitivity
as well as applications. Gd-based agents typically
belong to the class of positive contrast agents. These produce a high intensity
on T
1-weighted images by shortening of T
1 relaxation
times. Negative contrast agents are typically nanoparticles consisting of a
crystalline iron oxide core and a shell. These agents produce predominantly
local field inhomogeneities resulting in very high T
2 and T
2*
relaxivities. Contrast agents can also
be classified based on size and structure: small-molecular, macromolecular,
micellar, liposomal and nanoparticulate and the differences between these will
be illustrated. Small molecular agents (linear or macrocyclic) are usually
injected intravenously and tend to distribute in the plasma and interstitial
spaces. The agents have a half-life of 1-2 hr and are cleared through the renal
route. The pharmacokinetics and route of excretion of these agents can be
modified by chemical alteration of the chelates. Conjugation of the small
molecular Gd chelates with macromolecules such as polymers,
dendrimers and proteins improves the relaxivity of contrast agents by various mechanisms.
Macro-molecular and nanoparticulate contrast agents have been shown to have
higher relaxivities, longer blood circulation, better accumulation in tumor
tissues, longer retention times (due to slower clearance) and lower toxicities
than small molecular agents. Contrast agent retention in pathological tissues
can be further improved by incorporating chemical moieties that “target” the
tissue microenvironment. Finally
we outline the future prospects for this important field of research and
highlight some new applications of relaxation based agents (e.g. hypoxia
imaging).
Acknowledgements
The assistance of Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal in preparing the lecture slides is greatly appreciated.References
No reference found.