Synopsis
MRI relies on detecting signals in the radiofrequency range
that are related to very small energy transitions of the spin ensemble. While
this is a blessing with regard to the harmless character of the radiation, it
imposes a serious problem in terms of the low sensitivity caused by almost
vanishing spin polarization at ambient temperatures. Increasing the sensitivity
through artificial enhancement of the net magnetization relies on so-called hyperpolarized agents for NMR and MRI. Hyperpolarization is a
powerful technique that has enabled many varied applications for molecular and
cellular imaging. This tutorial will summarize the methods of hyperpolarization,
probe design and optimized signal encoding.
Introduction and motivation
MRI suffers from intrinsic low sensitivity because it is related to very small energy transitions of the spin ensemble
which is characterized by almost equal population of the spin energy levels. This yields
almost vanishing spin polarization at ambient temperatures (see Fig. 1). Large
spin pools like that of the abundant water in tissue are therefore the signal source
in conventional imaging. However, the concept of the expanding field of
molecular and metabolic imaging is based on progress in the understanding of
many diseases on a molecular level and requires a significantly improved
sensitivity to detect highly dilute compounds. Increasing the detectable magnetization through special preparation
of the spin system prior to encoding and detection is therefore a
continuing endeavour in
the field of NMR and MRI. Hyperpolarization is a technique that increases the sensitivity of NMR and MRI by a special preparation of the system that shifts it far away from thermal equilibrium. Though being of transient nature, it
is a powerful approach that has enabled many applications for molecular and
cellular imaging. Drug development and therapeutic monitoring will also benefit significantly from specific contrast agents or metabolites with
enhanced sensitivity since a biochemical or cell biological response to a
certain treatment usually occurs much earlier than mesoscopic changes in
morphology.1 MRI will make important
contributions because the noninvasiveness of this modality for repetitive
studies of an organism is an important aspect in this context which encourages ongoing
efforts for solving the sensitivity issue.2
Currently available techniques
Considerable effort has been undertaken to improve NMR and
MRI methods to make them part of the molecular imaging toolbox and to
complement other modalities which themselves exhibit serious limitations. As
most studies rely on the detection of the NMR signal with radiofrequency (RF)
coils through classical Faraday induction, a macroscopic magnetization of the
dilute marker molecules is still necessary. The common approach is an ex situ manipulation
of the magnetization beyond thermal equilibrium to allow the detection of
dilute spins. Such systems with populations largely deviating from this equilibrium
are called ‘hyperpolarized’ and can be generated for various molecules of
biomedical interest. The advantage of NMR is that the origin of the detectable signal,
i.e. the macroscopic magnetization, does not influence the pharmacokinetic and
pharmacological behavior, regardless of the achieved spin polarization. In this
context, hyperpolarization of several different nuclei has been achieved,
including carbon, which has always been of great interest.
Efficient approaches rely on employing interactions on the
atomic level to push the ensemble far beyond equilibrium. Other spin systems
that are more easily polarized can be manipulated to function as a polarization
precursor. Then, through various interactions, the polarization can be
transferred onto the eventually detected nuclei. This can extend the range of
achievable polarization from thermal polarization, P = 10-5–10-6, all the way to
the theoretical limit of P = 1. Three main approaches are discussed with their
advantages and limitations.3 Their basic principles of
interactions between the precursor and the eventually detected nuclei are
depicted in Fig. 2.
For Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP), the thermal polarization
of unpaired electrons is used as the initial source of magnetization. This is at
any given field strength and temperature much higher than for 1H protons or any
other nuclei. DNP exploits the spin of unpaired electrons of free radicals to polarize
NMR-active nuclei. If the electron couples with nearby nuclei through scalar or
dipolar interactions, by irradiating at or around the electron Larmor
frequency, the electron polarization can be transferred to the nuclei. The upper
limit of the polarization of the nuclei is determined by the thermal polarization
of the electrons.
Techniques based on chemical incorporation of para-hydrogen
(PHIP and SABRE) rely on the fact that hydrogen exists in two different
isomers, para- and orthohydrogen, that have remarkably different NMR properties.
Para-hydrogen represents the antisymmetric energy eigenstate and has a total
spin of zero, and, as such, cannot be detected directly in an NMR experiment. However,
its spin order can be converted into detectable magnetization and it is easy to
increase the population of para-hydrogen from (the high-temperature limit of)
25% to 90% just by cooling to < 50 K. To create a detectable NMR signal, the
symmetry of the hydrogen molecule must be broken. This can be achieved through
a hydrogenation chemical reaction. The two hydrogen atoms must bind to magnetically
inequivalent sites on the target molecule, breaking their symmetry, whilst
remaining coupled. Different methods are used to transfer the spin order
generated by PHIP into longitudinal magnetization of, e.g., 13C of different tracers,
including adiabatic field cycling and RF pulse sequences.
The intrinsic polarization of photons is used to generate
hyperpolarized noble gases through Spin Exchange Optical Pumping (SEOP). It found early applications in lung imaging using
3He and 129Xe. In particular, Xe is a promising candidate for many applications
beyond gas phase imaging, including molecular sensing. The initial step for SEOP
is the production of circularly polarized light, which is then used to pump a
specific transition in an alkali metal vapor that serves as an effective
one-electron system. Such electrons can later undergo spin–spin interactions
with Xe nuclei when brought into close contact. This transfers the polarization onto the noble gas.
Diagnostic applications
All of the techniques yield enhancement factors of up to 105,
hence they typically achieve polarization levels in the range of a few percent to
almost 100%, depending on the application. Most initial studies originated in
the context of physical chemistry. The increasing number of animal applications
and clinical studies required adaptations of entire protocols to specific in vivo
conditions. The basic configurations of clinical whole body scanners, in
particular, and sometimes also animal scanners are not necessarily sufficient
to perform such studies and make hardware adaptations necessary. Further
challenges for the translation of initial proof of principle studies mainly
include the production of pharmacologically safe hyperpolarized agents and the
mastering of in vivo relaxation conditions. Fast encoding of the transiently
available magnetization is crucial for making optimum use of the signal
enhancement.
Based on recent progress, metabolic imaging with tracers such
as [1-13C]pyruvate has made it already into clinical applications in oncology.4 Studies involving
para-hydrogen are currently exploring different tracers for biomedical
applications.5 Hyperpolarized Xe finds an
increasing number of applications in lung disease diagnostics6 and in fundamental research to
allow for ultra-sensitive imaging of cell surface markers at nanomolar
concentrations.7,8
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Brindle, K. New approaches for
imaging tumour responses to treatment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 94–107
(2008).
2. Kurhanewicz, J. et
al. Analysis of Cancer Metabolism by Imaging Hyperpolarized Nuclei:
Prospects for Translation to Clinical Research. Neoplasia 13,
81–97 (2011).
3. Witte, C. &
Schröder, L. NMR of hyperpolarised probes. NMR Biomed. 26,
788–802 (2013).
4. Nelson, S. J. et
al. Metabolic Imaging of Patients with Prostate Cancer Using Hyperpolarized
[1-13C]Pyruvate. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 198ra108–198ra108 (2013).
5. Glöggler, S.,
Colell, J. & Appelt, S. Para-hydrogen perspectives in hyperpolarized NMR. J.
Magn. Reson. 235, 130–142 (2013).
6. Walkup, L. L. &
Woods, J. C. Translational applications of hyperpolarized 3He and 129Xe. NMR
Biomed. 27, 1429–1438 (2014).
7. Rose, H. M. et
al. Development of an antibody-based, modular biosensor for 129Xe NMR
molecular imaging of cells at nanomolar concentrations. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. 111, 11697–11702 (2014).
8. Witte, C. et al.
Live-cell MRI with Xenon Hyper-CEST Biosensors Targeted to Metabolically
Labeled Cell-Surface Glycans. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 2806–2810
(2015).