Synopsis
This presentation will highlight the differences between PET radiopharmaceuticals and MRI contrast agents with respect to regulatory approval in order to educate those working with PET/MRI on the regulatory framework under which PET radiopharmaceuticals can be administered.Target Audience
All healthcare professionals that have interactions with
PET/MRI imaging will benefit from the information in this presentation.
Objectives
This presentation will review the radiopharmaceutical
practices in different countries and educate the audience on regulatory framework
for the use of radiopharmaceuticals throughout the world.
Purpose
Radiopharmaceuticals are drugs that have incorporated a
radioactive atom for the purpose of either diagnostic imaging or radiation
therapy (this presentation will not cover the radiation therapy aspects of
radiopharmaceuticals). The properties of
the drug are selected to ensure that the delivery is to a specific cellular
target, providing high-quality images of physiological processes. The manufacturing of radiopharmaceuticals
must occur within a good manufacturing practice (GMP) environment to ensure
safety, regardless of whether the manufacturer is a commercial supplier or an
in-house facility. GMP regulations are
in place to ensure that the finished radiopharmaceutical meets the key
components of product quality: safety, efficacy, purity and uniformity.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) utilizes short-lived
radioisotopes, with half-lives on the order of minutes to hours, and thus have
short shelf lives. As such, commercial
manufacturing is not always practical and in-house production is sometimes
necessary due to the just-in-time nature of PET drug manufacturing. This is a very different environment than MRI
contrast agents, which are widely available commercially and can be stocked
well in advance of the imaging study. In
addition, only a handful of PET radiopharmaceuticals have been approved for
clinical use and a great number of PET radiopharmaceuticals are administered as
part of a clinical trial rather than for routine clinical use.
It is imperative that PET radiopharmaceutical regulations
are followed when performing PET/MRI studies.
Unfortunately, there is not a harmonized framework for PET radiopharmaceutical
regulations, so it is necessary to understand the regulations that are specific
to a local region in order to assure compliance.
Discussion
In order to understand the scope of PET radiopharmaceutical
regulations, it is helpful to look at the examples of how some
countries/regions regulate PET radiopharmaceuticals.
Australia: The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
oversees the production of all medicinal products, including
radiopharmaceuticals. The guidelines
provide satisfactory licensing requirements for the production of
radiopharmaceuticals and include Australian Registry for Therapeutic Goods
(ARTG) numbers for individual drugs.
Radiopharmaceuticals without assigned ARTG numbers can be manufactured
by commercial suppliers for a specific patient study under the Special Access
Scheme (SAS). New radiopharmaceuticals
manufactured in-house are usually exempt from licensing by TGA. Instead, the local Institutional Review Board
(IRB) controls the oversight of these radiopharmaceuticals. These radiopharmaceuticals must comply with
United States Pharmacopoeia and/or British Pharmacopoeia regulations and the
synthesis modules used for manufacturing must be approved.
European Union (EU): The manufacture and use of
radiopharmaceuticals for both clinical and research use are regulated by
several European bodies and by national authorities. The European Commission EudraLex Volume 4
“Guidelines for Good Manufacturing Practices for Medicinal Products for Human and
Veterinary Use” describes the rules for manufacturing medicinal products,
including radiopharmaceuticals and is in effect for all Member States. The European Medicine Agency (EMEA) is
responsible for evaluating the applications for marketing authorizations of new
drugs. Radiopharmaceuticals used in
clinical trials are subject to the rules of the nation under which the trial is
being conducted and vary from nation to nation within Europe.
Japan: The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (WHLW) and
the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Agency (PMDA) are responsible for the
approval of radiopharmaceuticals in Japan.
In order to meet GMP requirements, radiopharmaceuticals should be
manufactured using an approved synthesis module with rigorous process controls
and quality assurance that meets the guidelines and monographs published by the
Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine (JSNM).
United States: PET radiopharmaceuticals must be manufactured
under Section 212 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR
212). This standard applies to approved
PET radiopharmaceuticals as well as those that are in Phase III and IV clinical
trials. PET radiopharmaceuticals being
used in earlier phase clinical trials have the option of being manufactured
under either 21 CFR 212 or Chapter <823> of the United States
Pharmacopeia (USP, 32nd edition, 2009). There are two appropriate pathways when
conducting a clinical trial with radiopharmaceuticals: the Radioactive Drug
Research Committee (RDRC) or Investigational New Drug (IND) application. The RDRC is a local committee that is allowed
to approve initial phases of clinical trials under certain conditions in place
of FDA approval. An IND is needed to
perform any radiopharmaceutical clinical trial that is not being performed
under RDRC oversight.
Conclusion
While regulations vary across the globe, the general
framework is the same. PET
radiopharmaceuticals in routine clinical use will have been approved by the
appropriate regulatory body and should be available by either commercial or
in-house suppliers. It is important to
verify that the supplier has the appropriate approvals from the regulatory body
before the PET radiopharmaceutical is purchased/used in diagnostic imaging
studies. PET radiopharmaceuticals for
use in clinical trials will require a more rigorous approach. It is imperative that the imaging site is
well versed in the local regulations concerning the use of radiopharmaceuticals
in clinical trials and follows due diligence to ensure compliance with all
local laws.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Positron Emission
Tomography Drugs, 21 C.F.R. § 212
Guideline on Radiopharmaceuticals, EMEA/CHMP/QWP/306970/2007
Investigational New Drug Application, 21 C.F.R. § 312
Radioactive Drugs for Certain Research Uses, 21 C.F.R. § 361.1