Synopsis
Objectives:
1.
To
review chemical properties of commercially available gadolinium based contrast
agents (GBCAs)
2.
To
review applications of commercially available GBCAs
3.
To
review current recommendations for safe use of GBCAsTarget Audience
Radiologists,
basic scientists and technologists performing contrast-enhanced MR examinations
for clinical or research purposes
Objectives
1.
To
review chemical properties of commercially available gadolinium based contrast
agents (GBCAs)
2.
To
review applications of commercially available GBCAs
3.
To
review current recommendations for safe use of GBCAs
Outline
This presentation
will focus on those contrast agents that are used in clinical practice, namely
gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). These can be broadly divided by their
biodistribution, which dictates where they are most effectively clinically.
GBCAs fall under 3 main categories: extracellular agents, dual agents and blood
pool agents.
The chemical properties of each contrast
agent will be described, with regards to structure, pharmacokinetics and relaxivity.
In general, GBCAs decrease the T1 relaxation time within blood/ enhancing
tissue, appearing relatively brighter on T1 weighted imaging compared to
unenhanced tissue.
Biodistribution of the various GBCAs influences how they are best
used, and recommended dose:
1.
Extracellular
agents: the majority of
GBCAs, which can aid in the diagnosis and assessment of a wide variety of
conditions including neoplasm, infection/ inflammation, and vascular disease.
Such agents include gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem), gadoteridol (ProHance),
gadobutrol (Gadavist), gadopentatate dimeglumine (Magnevist) and gadodiamide
(Omniscan).
2.
Dual
contrast agents: these
are eliminated via both renal and hepatobiliary routes, and therefore have particular
application in the assessment of liver disease, particularly focal liver
lesions. Gadoxetic acid (Eovist/ Primovist) has approximately 50% hepatobiliary
excretion, requiring a shorter delay for hepatobiliary phase imaging than
gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance).
3.
Blood
pool agents: gadofosveset
trisodium (Ablavar) is an agent that binds to albumin with very high T1
relaxivity. As such, it has particular application in vascular (both arterial
and venous) imaging, and may also be applied to tissue perfusion.
Safety considerations are paramount, and there must be sufficient benefit
to outweigh risks of contrast agent use. General risks of any contrast agent
include allergy and puncture site complications. More specific risks related to
gadolinium chelates will also be discussed, including Nephrogenic Systemic
Fibrosis, and tissue deposition of contrast, highlighting contrast agents
associated with greater risk and at-risk patient groups.
Current
recommendations for safe use will be reviewed, and discussion of situations when
contrast need not necessarily be used.
Off-label/ Emerging Contrast Agents will be briefly discussed, time
permitting, in particular ferumoxytol (Feraheme/ Rienso), a superparamagnetic iron
oxide that is clinically approved for treatment of iron deficiency anemia in
chronic kidney disease, but that has off-label application as a MRI contrast
agent.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Aime
S et al. Biodistribution of gadolinium-based contrast agents, including
gadolinium deposition. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 1259-1267.
2.
Rohrer
M et al. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at
different field strengths. Investigative Radiology 2005; 40: 715-724.
3.
Jhaveri
K et al. Consensus statements from a multidisciplinary expert panel on the
utilization and application of liver-specific MRI contrast agent (gadoxetic
acid). Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204: 498-509.
4.
Seale
MK et al. Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver
and biliary tree. Radiographics 2009; 29: 1725-1748.
5.
Sabach
AS et al. Gadofosveset trisodium: abdominal and peripheral vascular
applications. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 1378-86.
6.
ACR
Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. ACR Manual on Contrast Media, v10.1,
2015. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/Contrast%20Manual/2015_Contrast_Media.pdf,
accessed 23/2/2016.
7.
European
Society of Urogenital Radiology. ESUR Guidelines on Contrast Media. http://esur2015.org/index.php/en/,
accessed 23/2/2016.
8.
Haneder
S et al. Safety of Magnetic Resonance Contrast Media: A review with special
focus on Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 24: 57-65.
9.
Kanda
T et al. Brain gadolinium deposition after administration of gadolinium-based
contrast agents. Radiology 2015; 277: 924-5.
10.
Ramalho
J et al. Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulation and toxicity: an update.
Am J Neuroradiol 2015, Dec 10, epub ahead of print.
11.
Mukundan
S et al. Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in late-stage CKD. Am
J Kidney Dis 2016, Jan 16, epub ahead of print.