Synopsis
This presentation will highlight the value of MRI for risk-stratification and appropriate treatment selection in patients with new diagnosis of endometrial and cervical cancer. It will also illustrate the central role of MRI prior to fertility sparing treatments in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer, respectively. At the end of the presentation, the attendees will be able to recognize and report clinically pertinent imaging findings when evaluating patients with new diagnosis of endometrial or cervical cancer. This information is important for the radiologist to serve as an effective consultant to the referring physician.Target Audience
Target audiences for
this presentation are general and
sub-specialty radiologists, radiology fellows/residents, MR technologists, and
imaging scientists who would like to refresh and sharpen their diagnostic imaging
skills of using MR imaging to evaluate patients with various types of malignant
diseases of the uterus.
Discussion
Endometrial Cancer:
Endometrial cancer is the most common malignancy of the
female genital tract and the fourth most common cancer among women in developed
countries [Global Cancer Facts & Figures
3rd Edition. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2015] (1). The main risk factor for endometrial cancer is
endogenous and exogenous estrogen exposure. The incidence of endometrial cancer
in developed countries is on the rise because of an aging population, epidemic
of obesity, and growing prevalence of diabetes mellitus, all associated with
increased estrogenic exposure (2).
Abnormal
uterine bleeding is the most common presenting symptom of endometrial cancer. It
is observed in up to 90% of patients (usually after menopause) and is evaluated
further with pelvic ultrasonography (US) and endometrial biopsy. In
postmenopausal women, endometrial thickness cutoff of 5 mm on pelvic US
produced the sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 54% for endometrial cancer compared
with 98% and 35%, respectively, when the cutoff of 3 mm was used (3).
Presence of
regional lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor for patients with
endometrial cancer (4-6). The likelihood of nodal metastasis is determined by
tumor grade and histologic subtype, depth of myometrial invasion, cervical
stromal invasion, and lymphovascular space involvement (7-9). While tumor grade and histologic subtype are available
from the initial biopsy specimens, endometrial biopsy and final surgical pathology
specimens are discordant in up to 30% because only a small fraction of tumor is
sampled during the biopsy (10). Lymphovascular space invasion is the best predictor of
lymph node status, but this information is not available until after the
surgery (11).
The role of
preoperative evaluation is to risk-stratify the patients in order to establish the
risk of recurrence and to inform the surgical management. MR imaging is the
most accurate imaging modality for preoperative staging of patients with
endometrial cancer and it has high interobserver agreement (12). MR imaging can provide the surgeon
with the information about the local extent of disease including the depth of myometrial
invasion, cervical stromal invasion, extra-uterine extension, and lymph node
status (12). In young patients with endometrial
cancer who desire to preserve their fertility, MRI is useful to establish the
absence of myometrial invasion. Absence of myometrial invasion is one of the
several eligibility criteria that should be met prior to the initiation of conservative
management for endometrial cancer (13).
Suggested MRI Protocol:
·
Large field-of-view axial T1W and T2WI to
include para-aortic regions
·
Small field-of-view high resolution sagittal
T2WI
·
Small field-of-view high resolution
axial oblique T2WI perpendicular to the uterine corpus
·
Sagittal and axial oblique DWI to match T2WI
·
Sagittal and axial oblique dynamic
contrast-enhanced images pre and post contrast administration
Pertinent Imaging Findings to Include
In the Radiology Report:
·
Tumor size
·
Depth of myometrial invasion (any myometrial invasion
if the patient is being considered for fertility preserving treatment)
·
Cervical stromal invasion
·
Uterine serosal, vaginal, and adnexal
involvement
·
Involvement of the bladder and rectum
·
Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node status
·
Distant metastasis
Cervical
Cancer:
Cervical
cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of death
among women worldwide [Global Cancer Facts & Figures 3rd Edition. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2015]. The
highest incidence rates of cervical cancer are in Central and South America and
sub-Saharan Africa. Cervical cancer is the
first malignancy where direct relation between a viral infection and cancer was
proposed (14). It is thought that a woman must
be infected with HPV before she develops cervical cancer and two-thirds of all
cervical cancers are caused by HPV 16 and 18 (15,
16).
In developed countries, most cervical cancers are
diagnosed in asymptomatic patients at the time of routine screening with a Pap
smear. Symptomatic patients usually present with abnormal vaginal bleeding and
occasional vaginal discomfort or malodorous discharge.
Cervical
cancer arises from the squamocolumnar
junction which migrates over the years form the ectocervix in young women into
the endocervical canal in older women. Therefore, exophytic tumors are typical
for young women while endophytic tumors are more characteristic for older
women.
Squamous
cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma are the two most common histologic subtypes
of cervical cancer accounting for 69% and 25% of cases, respectively [Ries
LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2004.
National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD 2007]. The incidence of adenocarcinoma is on a rise in the
more developed countries because adenocarcinoma in situ (the precursor lesion)
is detected less efficiently by Pap-smear screening compared to preinvasive
squamous lesions (squamous dysplasia and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,
CIN).
Cervical
cancer is most commonly staged based on the International Federation of
Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) system, last revised in 2009 (17). The FIGO staging of cervical cancer is clinical and
does not rely on either surgical or pathologic findings. This allows uniformity of staging for all patients
worldwide, which is of particular importance because cervical cancer is most
prevalent in countries where surgical and diagnostic resources are limited. The FIGO staging committee has acknowledged
the limitations of clinical staging and, where available, has incorporated
cross-sectional imaging into the initial assessment and treatment planning of
patients with cervical cancer (17).
MR imaging is central to risk-stratify patients with cervical cancer and
to inform treatment decisions. MR imaging can evaluate such important
prognostic factors as tumor size, parametrial invasion, pelvic sidewall involvement,
and lymph node metastasis. MRI can help to distinguish early stage disease
(up to 4cm), which is treated surgically, from early stage bulky disease (greater than 4cm)
and locally advanced disease, which are treated with definitive combined
chemotherapy and radiation (12, 18).
MRI is also critical to assess the eligibility for fertility sparing
procedures in patients with early-stage cervical cancer who desire fertility
preservation. MRI can determine maximal tumor size, tumor-to-internal cervical
os distance, depth of cervical stromal invasion, presence of parametrial
invasion, and lymph node status (19).
Suggested MRI Protocol:
·
Large field-of-view axial T1W and T2WI to
include para-aortic regions
·
Small field-of-view high resolution sagittal
T2WI
·
Small field-of-view high resolution
axial oblique T2WI perpendicular to the cervix
·
Sagittal and axial oblique DWI to match T2WI
·
Sagittal and axial oblique dynamic
contrast-enhanced images pre and post intravenous contrast administration
Pertinent Imaging Findings to Include
In the Radiology Report:
·
Tumor size
·
If considered for fertility
preservation, tumor-to-internal cervical os distance
·
Tumor extension into the uterus and vagina
·
Parametrial extension
·
Presence of hydronephrosis or pelvic
sidewall involvement
·
Involvement of the bladder or rectum
·
Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node status
·
Distant metastasis
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R,
et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major
patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International journal of cancer Journal
international du cancer. 2015;136(5):E359-86.
2. Morice P, Leary
A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2015.
3. Timmermans A,
Opmeer BC, Khan KS, et al. Endometrial thickness measurement for detecting
endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;116(1):160-7.
4. DiSaia PJ,
Creasman WT, Boronow RC, Blessing JA. Risk factors and recurrent patterns in
Stage I endometrial cancer. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1985;151(8):1009-15.
5. Mariani A, Webb
MJ, Rao SK, Lesnick TG, Podratz KC. Significance of pathologic patterns of
pelvic lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. Gynecologic oncology.
2001;80(2):113-20.
6. Greven KM,
Lanciano RM, Corn B, Case D, Randall ME. Pathologic stage III endometrial
carcinoma. Prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence. Cancer.
1993;71(11):3697-702.
7. Boronow RC,
Morrow CP, Creasman WT, et al. Surgical staging in endometrial cancer:
clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study. Obstetrics and gynecology.
1984;63(6):825-32.
8. Mariani A, Webb
MJ, Keeney GL, Lesnick TG, Podratz KC. Surgical stage I endometrial cancer:
predictors of distant failure and death. Gynecologic oncology.
2002;87(3):274-80.
9. Creasman WT,
Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB. Surgical pathologic
spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.
Cancer. 1987;60(8 Suppl):2035-41.
10. Eltabbakh GH,
Shamonki J, Mount SL. Surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with
endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows
well-differentiated tumors. Gynecologic oncology. 2005;99(2):309-12.
11. Bendifallah S,
Canlorbe G, Raimond E, et al. A clue towards improving the European Society of
Medical Oncology risk group classification in apparent early stage endometrial
cancer? Impact of lymphovascular space invasion. British journal of cancer.
2014;110(11):2640-6.
12. Sala E, Rockall
AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C. The added role of MR imaging in
treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the
radiologist needs to know. Radiology. 2013;266(3):717-40.
13. Burke WM, Orr
J, Leitao M, et al. Endometrial cancer: a review and current management
strategies: part II. Gynecologic oncology. 2014;134(2):393-402.
14. Walboomers JM,
Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of
invasive cervical cancer worldwide. The Journal of pathology. 1999;189(1):12-9.
15. Waggoner SE.
Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2003;361(9376):2217-25.
16. Schiffman M,
Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S. Human papillomavirus and
cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):890-907.
17. Pecorelli S,
Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. International
journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International
Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2009;105(2):107-8.
18. Haie-Meder C,
Morice P, Castiglione M. Cervical cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for
diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology : official journal of
the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2009;20 Suppl 4:27-8.
19. Noel P, Dube M,
Plante M, St-Laurent G. Early cervical carcinoma and fertility-sparing
treatment options: MR imaging as a tool in patient selection and a follow-up
modality. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of
North America, Inc. 2014;34(4):1099-119.