Synopsis
This study shows that
helical and laminar microstructures in the myocardium and their dynamic
reorientations during cardiac contraction can be studied by in vivo cDTI
non-invasively and non- destructively. Furthermore, it demonstrates in the loaded and beating heart in vivo that sheetlet reorientation
is the predominant mechanism underlying myocardial LV wall thickening during
systolic contraction. Further study of the microstructural dynamics of cardiac
contraction and myocardial dysfunction with in vivo cDTI may produce new
diagnostic and prognostic information in human cardiac disease. Target Audience
Scientists and clinicians interested in left ventricular
microstructure and cardiac contraction.
Scientists and clinicians interested in the field of cardiac
diffusion weighted imaging (cDWI) and cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI).
Highlights
- The microstructural organistaions of
cardiomyocytes and their cyclic re-arrengements throughout the cardiac
cycle determine both left ventricular regional contractile function and
electrical conduction; and they are subject to remodelling in the presence
of disease.
- Improved understanding
of altered myocardial microstructural dynamics in patients with cardiac disease
may provide new insights into their diagnosis, risk stratification and
evaluation of treatment efficacy, as well as potentially identifying new
therapeutic targets.
- Cardiac Diffusion Weighted Imaging
(cDWI) and cardiac Diffusion Tensor Imaging (cDTI) are non-invasive and
non-destructive MRI approaches that can provide information on the three
dimensional microstructure of the myocardium.
Objectives
This presentation will focus on cardiac diffusion weighted
imaging (cDWI) and cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) for in vivo cardiac
tissue characterization.
At the conclusion of this presentation, participants will be
better able to:
- Describe the
microstructural arrangements of cardiomyocytes in the left ventricular
(LV) myocardium.
- Describe the mechanistic basis that
underlies thickening of normal LV myocardium in vivo.
- Understand the basic
principles of in vivo cDWI and
cDTI techniques.
- Understand the potential
of in vivo cDWI and cDTI both for basic science research and for
clinical research.
Purpose
The development of contractile dysfunction and
adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling are associated with poor prognosis. The contribution of the micro-architectural
arrangement of cardiomyocytes to LV wall thickening, and how it changes through
the cardiac cycle, is not widely appreciated as most research is focused at a
biochemical, cellular or macroscopic wall thickness scale. Improved understanding of the processes underlying these observations
may provide new insights into the risk stratification and personalized
treatment planning for these patients, as well as identifying new treatment
targets. Furthermore, this may enhance evaluation of novel therapies, aimed at
improving clinical outcomes for patients in whom prognosis remains poor despite
conventional treatment.
Microstructure of the Left Ventricle
The microstructure of the compact myocardium of the left ventricle (LV) in
humans and other mammals consists of a syncytium of cardiomyocytes embedded in
a primarily collagen matrix. From LV apex to base, cardiomyocytes progress from
left handed helices in the epicardium, through circumferentially arrangements in
the mesocardium, into right handed helices in the endocardium [1, 2]. This architecture can be described
quantitatively by the helix angle (HA), which transitions transmurally from circa
-60o to +60o from epicardium to endocardium [3, 4].
Cardiac contraction involves both longitudinal and circumferential
shortening of the LV (~10-25%, depending on direction and depth) together with
radial wall thickening (>35%), and twisting of the apex relative to the base
[5]. Cardiomyocytes, which are the
fundamental contractile element in the heart, only shorten by approximately 15%
and thicken by approximately 8% during systole [5].
Cardiomyocytes are organised in laminar microstructures known as sheets
or sheetlets [3, 6]. These structures are about 5-10
cardiomyocytes thick, and are separated by collagen-lined shear layers. These sheetlet
planes extend both in the direction of local cardiomyocytes long-axis (helical
orientation) and across them, in directions that are oblique to the local
epicardial wall tangent plane [7]. Sheetlets have been described to swivel
cyclically so that they lie more parallel to the local epicardial wall tangent
plane in diastole and more perpendicular to it in systole [8], and LV wall thickening and
base-to-apex shortening during systole have been attributed mainly to sheetlet
reorientation and concomitant shear layer slippage, with just a small
contribution from thickening of individual cardiomyocytes.
Cardiac Diffusion
Tensor Imaging
Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) has been most widely
applied to in vivo neural
microstructure imaging [9-13]. More recently has it also been
applied to the study of the myocardium [14-25]. The basic principle is that an MRI
signal is attenuated by the self-diffusion of water in the presence of
diffusion encoding gradients. By repeating the MRI sequence with diffusion gradients
applied along different directions, a diffusion tensor can be calculated for
each image voxel. From this tensor, a set of three mutually perpendicular
eigenvectors and eigenvalues can be calculated which describe the diffusion
ellipsoid. In cardiac DTI (cDTI), the primary eigenvector (E1) corresponds to
the local cardiomyocyte long-axis orientation, the secondary eigenvector (E2)
corresponds to the local within-sheetlet cross-cardiomyocyte orientation, and
the third eigenvector (E3) is perpendicular to E1 and E2, and therefore the
sheetlet plane. From these data, it is possible to derive measures of
myocardial tissue integrity, such as mean diffusivity (MD), fractional
anisotropy (FA), E1A as an index of the mean intravoxel HA, and E2A as an index
of the mean intravoxel sheetlet angle (SA)[18, 25].
The technical challenge for in
vivo cDWI and cDTI is to detect incoherent diffusional motion on a
micrometer scale in the setting of coherent bulk cardiac motion on a scale five
orders of magnitude larger. Nonetheless, in vivo cDWI was successfully
implemented for the first time by Edelman et al. [14]. Recent studies have
demonstrated the potential of in vivo cDWI in detecting myocardial replacement
fibrosis for chronic myocardial infarction [26, 27]
and diffuse fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) [28]. Furthermore, cDTI methods have
been reported to demonstrate the HA structure in the normal heart in vivo [15, 17] and in different pathological
conditions [18, 19, 29-31], supported by studies validating ex vivo cDTI against histology [21-23]. cDTI data in ex vivo rodent
hearts imaged separately in contracted and relaxed states supporting
reorientation of laminar structures at different phases of the cardiac cycle
has been reported [24, 25], as well as in vivo in healthy volunteers at systole [20].
Both intra-centre and inter-centre reproducibility studies of a
quantitative technique for in vivo
cardiac DTI have been preformed in healthy volunteers [32, 33] and in patients with HCM [34]. Using this technique, E2A changes
from diastole to systole were presented which were hypothesised to represent
dynamic rearrangement of sheetlets in healthy volunteers, as well as E2A
changes consistent with systolic hyper-contraction and attenuated diastolic
relaxation in patients with HCM [18]. No formal validation of in vivo cDTI against in situ cDTI and ex vivo cDTI together with paired histology data has been presented
to date.
Methods
The aims of this study were to validate in vivo cDTI measures of cardiac microstructure against histology as
well as to noninvasively characterise the microstructural dynamics underlying LV
wall thickening in the loaded beating heart in vivo. This hypothesis was
tested in a swine model, providing
the first report of in vivo cDTI at 6-9 time points throughout the
cardiac cycle, followed by in situ cDTI, ex vivo cDTI and
coregistered histology in two contractile states. This design of these
experiments enabled evaluation of myocardial microstructural dynamics in the
presence and absence of bulk motion and strain.
Animal procedures were approved by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute (NHLBI) Animal Care and Use Committee. In summary, in vivo cDTI was performed in Yorkshire
pigs (N=16) at two mid-ventricular short axis (SAX) slices and at 6 to 9 time
points across the cardiac cycle. Next, a mid-ventricular SAX slice was
continuously imaged with cDTI in the intact animal in situ during the first hour after induction of cardiac arrest in
both relaxed (N=6) and contracted (N=8) states by intravenous administration of
potassium chloride (KCl) [24] and barium chloride (BaCl2)
[24], respectively. The BaCl2
arrested hearts initially approximated a relaxed configuration but about 20-40
minutes after injection underwent one single final contraction over a time
period of 5-10 minutes. This experiment effectively slowed cardiac contraction
by three orders of magnitude (from ~300 ms in vivo in a beating heart to
~5 minutes) and enabled investigation of contractile motion by cDTI in the
absence of cyclical strain effects. The hearts were then excised and imaged by ex vivo cDTI (N=16), after which tissue
samples were acquired for paired histology (N=16).
Results and Conclusion
The results demonstrated small changes in the cDTI measures of helix
angle over the cardiac cycle. On the other hand, sheetlet angle cDTI measures changed
substantially over the cardiac cycle. cDTI measures of sheetlet angle
correlated significantly with wall thickness both in vivo and in situ.
These changes with contraction were consistently observed under all
experimental conditions and were in close agreement with quantitative histological
results in both relaxed and contracted states.
This study shows that helical and laminar
microstructures in the myocardium and their dynamic reorientations during
cardiac contraction can be studied by in vivo cDTI non-invasively and
non-destructively. Furthermore, it demonstrates in the
loaded and beating heart in vivo that sheetlet reorientation is the
predominant mechanism underlying myocardial LV wall thickening during systolic
contraction. The results of this
study support recent interpretation of in vivo cDTI data in patients
with HCM, in whom maintenance of a systolic sheetlet orientation during
diastole was suggested to account for increased LV wall thickness [18]. Further study of the
microstructural dynamics of cardiac contraction and myocardial dysfunction with
in vivo cDTI may produce new diagnostic and prognostic information in
human cardiac disease.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Joni Taylor, Shawn Kozlov,
Katherine Lucas for expert animal care. The authors would also like to thank
Prof. Stephen Hewitt, Dr Candice Perry and Dr Kris Ylaya for the use of the
Nanozoomer.
This work was supported by the
following:
- National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National
Institutes of Health by the Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, NIH, DHHS
(HL004607-14CPB).
- British Heart Foundation
- National Institute of Health Research Cardiovascular
Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College,
London.
References
1. Streeter, D. and D. Bassett, An engineering analysis of myocardial fiber
orientation in pigs left ventricle in systole. Anat Rec, 1966. 155(4): p. 503.
2. Streeter,
D., et al., Fiber Orientation in Canine
Left Ventricle during Diastole and Systole. Circ Res, 1969. 24(3): p. 339.
3. Sands,
G., et al., Automated imaging of extended
tissue volumes using confocal microscopy. Microsc Res Tech., 2005. 67: p. 227 - 39.
4. Smerup,
M., et al., The three-dimensional
arrangement of the myocytes aggregated together within the mammalian
ventricular myocardium. Anat Rec., 2009. 292: p. 1 - 11.
5. Axel,
L., V. Wedeen, and D. Ennis, Probing
dynamic myocardial microstructure with cardiac magnetic resonance diffusion
tensor imaging. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2014. 16(1): p. 89.
6. Hales,
P.W., et al., Histo-anatomical structure
of the living isolated rat heart in two contraction states assessed by
diffusion tensor MRI. Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 2012. 110(2-3): p. 319-30.
7. Harrington,
K., et al., Direct measurement of
transmural laminar architecture in the anterolateral wall of the ovine left
ventricle: new implications for wall thickening mechanics. Am J Physiol
Heart Circ Physiol., 2005. 288: p.
H1324 - 30.
8. Spotnitz,
H., et al., Cellular basis for volume
related wall thickness changes in Rat left-ventricle. J Mol Cell Cardiol,
1974. 6(4): p. 317.
9. Basser,
P., Inferring microstructural features
and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion- weighted images. NMR
Biomed., 1995. 8: p. 333 - 44.
10. Basser,
P.J., J. Mattiello, and D. LeBihan, MR
diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J, 1994. 66(1): p. 259-67.
11. Le
Bihan, D., Diffusion/perfusion MR imaging
of the brain: from structure to function. Radiology, 1990. 177(2): p. 328-329.
12. Merboldt,
K.-D., W. Hanicke, and J. Frahm, Self-diffusion
NMR imaging using stimulated echoes. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969),
1985. 64(3): p. 479-486.
13. Taylor,
D.G. and M.C. Bushell, The spatial
mapping of translational diffusion coefficients by the NMR imaging technique.
Phys Med Biol, 1985. 30(4): p.
345-9.
14. Edelman,
R., et al., In-vivo measurement of water
diffusion in the human heart. Magn Reson Med, 1994. 32(3): p. 423 - 8.
15. Reese,
T.G., et al., Imaging myocardial fiber
architecture in vivo with magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med, 1995. 34(6): p. 786-91.
16. Garrido,
L., et al., Anisotropy of water diffusion
in the myocardium of the rat. Circ Res, 1994. 74(5): p. 789-93.
17. Gamper,
U., P. Boesiger, and S. Kozerke, Diffusion
imaging of the in vivo heart using spin echoes--considerations on bulk motion
sensitivity. Magn Reson Med, 2007. 57(2):
p. 331-7.
18. Ferreira
PF, K., et al., In vivo cardiovascular
magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging shows evidence of abnormal
myocardial laminar orientations and mobillity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2014. 16:
p. 87.
19. Tseng,
W.-Y., et al., Imaging myocardial fiber
disarray and intramural strain hypokinesis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with
MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging., 2006. 23(1):
p. 1 - 8.
20. Dou,
J., et al., Cardiac diffusion MRI without
motion effects. Magn Reson Med., 2002. 48:
p. 105 - 14.
21. Kung,
G., et al., The presence of two local
myocardial sheet populations confirmed by diffusion tensor MRI and histological
validation. J Magn Reson Imaging., 2011. 34: p. 1080 - 91.
22. Scollan,
D., et al., Histological validation of
myocardial microstructure obtained from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance
imaging. Am J Physiol., 1998. 275(6
Pt 2): p. H2308 - 18.
23. Scollan,
D., et al., Reconstruction of cardiac
ventricular geometry and fiber orientation using magnetic resonance imaging.
Ann Biomed Eng., 2000. 28: p. 934 -
44.
24. Chen,
J., et al., Regional ventricular wall
thickening reflects changes in cardiac fiber and sheet structure during
contraction: quantification with diffusion tensor MRI. Am J Physiol Heart
Circ Physiol., 2005. 289: p. H1898 -
907.
25. Hales,
P., et al., Histo-anatomical structure of
the living isolated rat heart in two contraction states assessed by diffusion
tensor MRI. Prog Biophys Mol Biol., 2012. 110: p. 319 - 30.
26. Nguyen,
C., et al., In vivo diffusion-weighted
MRI detection of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients.
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2015. 17(Suppl 1): p. P34.
27. Pop,
M., et al., Quantification of fibrosis in
infarcted swine hearts by ex vivolate gadolinium-enhancement and
diffusion-weighted MRI methods. Phys Med Biol, 2013. 58: p. 5009 - 5028.
28. Nguyen,
C., et al., Contrast-free detection of
myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with
diffusion-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Journal of
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2015. 17(1):
p. 107.
29. Wu, E.,
et al., MR diffusion tensor imaging study
of postinfarct myocardium structural remodeling in a porcine model. Magn
Reson Med, 2007. 58: p. 687 - 695.
30. Wu,
M.-T., et al., Diffusion tensor magnetic
resonance imaging mapping the fiber architecture remodeling in human myocardium
after infarction: correlation with viability and wall motion. Circulation,
2006. 114: p. 1036 - 1045.
31. Wu,
M.T., et al., Sequential changes of
myocardial microstructure in patients postmyocardial infarction by
diffusion-tensor cardiac MR: correlation with left ventricular structure and
function. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009. 2(1): p. 32-40, 6 p following 40.
32. Nielles-Vallespin,
S., et al., In vivo diffusion tensor MRI
of the human heart: reproducibility of breath-hold and navigator-based
approaches. Magn Reson Med., 2012. 70:
p. 454 - 65.
33. Tunnicliffe,
E.M., et al., Intercentre reproducibility
of cardiac apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in healthy
volunteers. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2014. 16: p. 31.
34. McGill,
L.A., et al., Reproducibility of in-vivo
diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2012. 14: p. 86.