TBI: Resting-State Functional MRI
Christopher T. Whitlow1

1Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States

Synopsis

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common, affecting more than 1.7 million Americans each year.1 Survivors of TBI may be left with subsequent cognitive, emotional, and behavioral changes that result in persistent disability and psychosocial/neuropsychiatric impairment. Advanced MRI approaches, including resting-state blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) are further expanding our ability to understand normal brain organization and the neurobiological basis of TBI. Of particular interest in the clinical domain is the apparent ability of resting-state fMRI to identify between-group differences in patients with head injury, even when conventional imaging fails to detect brain abnormalities, suggesting that MRI measures of functional connectivity may serve as future biomarkers of TBI.

One of the most commonly studied resting-state fMRI networks associated with TBI is the default mode network (DMN), a neuronal system that includes regions in medial parietal, lateral parietal, medial prefrontal, medial temporal and lateral temporal cortices.2 Resting-state functional connectivity has been shown to be significantly decreased between regions of the DMN across the severity spectrum of TBI3-10, and has been associated with DTI evidence of white matter damage within the DMN.11 In particular, patients with TBI-associated disorders of consciousness have demonstrated decreases in brain regions associated with the DMN.12 Furthermore, connectivity between the DMN posterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex has been shown to predict emergence from coma.5 Several studies have demonstrated alterations in task-induced DMN deactivation, with attenuated or loss of normal anti-correlation between the DMN and other networks across a range of TBI, from those with impaired consciousness13-14 to those with post-concussive sequelae.15-17 On the milder continuum of "subconcussive" TBI, several studies of sports-related head impact exposure have demonstrated abnormalities of DMN inter-network connectivity even in the absence of clinically diagnosed concussion18-19, which were related to abnormalities of cognitive performance.19 Recent studies have begun to investigate networks beyond the DMN, exploring post-TBI phenotypes of brain functional connectivity and outcomes following injury within the frontoparietal, salience, auditory, sensorimotor and visual networks.12, 20

To date, resting-state fMRI has been utilized primarily for research, demonstrating statistical differences between TBI and non-TBI groups. The ability to interpret resting-state fMRI data from a single patient with TBI does not presently exist in routine clinical practice. Several challenges for translating resting-state fMRI into clinical tools for TBI include: 1) lack of large-scale age-stratified fMRI data acquired from TBI and non-TBI subjects using standardized protocols developed with consensus by clinical and research communities, 2) insufficient data regarding patterns of injury that are predictive of clinical and neuropsychological deficits, and 3) lack of sufficient data regarding standard approaches to account for technical differences between clinical scanners that may introduce artifactual false-positives or -negatives into an individual patient assessment.21-22 Machine learning classification paradigms applied to TBI-associated resting-state fMRI features may be one approach to more rapid translation of advanced MRI techniques into clinical practice.22

Acknowledgements

R01 NS091602 (Whitlow/Stitzel/Maldjian)

NCAA-DoD Grand Alliance: Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium (Whitlow/Stitzel/Miles/Lintner)

References

1. Marin JR, Weaver MD, Yealy DM, et al. Trends in visits for traumatic brain injury to emergency departments in the United States. JAMA 2014;311:1917–19

2. Raichle ME. The brain’s default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci 2015;38:433–47

3. Demertzi A, Antonopoulos G, Heine L, et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients. Brain 2015;138:2619-31

4. Cauda F, Micon BM, Sacco K, et al. Disrupted intrinsic functional connectivity in the vegetative state. Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:429–31

5. Silva S, de Pasquale F, Vuillaume C, et al. Disruption of posteromedial large-scale neural communication predicts recovery from coma. Neurology 2015;85:1–9

6. Qin P, Wu X, Huang Z, et al. How are different neural networks related to consciousness? Ann Neurol 2015;78:594–605

7. Soddu A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bahri MA, et al. Identifying the default-mode component in spatial IC analyses of patients with disorders of consciousness. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:778–96

8. Demertzi A, Gomez F, Crone JS, et al. Multiple fMRI system-level baseline connectivity is disrupted in patients with consciousness alterations. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior. 2014;52:35–46

9. Mayer AR, Mannell MV, Ling J, et al. Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp 2011;32:1825–35

10. Zhu DC, Covassin T, Nogle S, et al. A potential biomarker in sports-related concussion: brain functional connectivity alteration of the default-mode network measured with longitudinal resting-state fMRI over thirty days. J Neurotrauma 2015;32:327–41

11. Sharp DJ, Beckmann CF, Greenwood R, et al. Default mode network functional and structural connectivity after traumatic brain injury. Brain 2011;134:2233–47

12. Hannawi Y, Lindquist MA, Caffo BS, et al. Resting brain activity in disorders of consciousness: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Neurology 2015;84:1272-80

13. Fernandez-Espejo D, Junque C, Cruse D, et al. Combination of diffusion tensor and functional magnetic resonance imaging during recovery from the vegetative state. BMC Neurol 2010;10:77

14. Crone JS, Ladurner G, Holler Y, et al. Deactivation of the default mode network as a marker of impaired consciousness: an fMRI study. PLoS One 2011;6, e26373

15. Bonnelle V, Ham TE, Leech R, et al. Salience network integrity predicts default mode network function after traumatic brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:4690–5

16. Mayer AR, Yang Z, Yeo RA, et al. A functional MRI study of multimodal selective attention following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav 2012;6:343–54

17. Jilka SR, Scott G, Ham T, et al. Damage to the salience network and interactions with the default mode network. J Neurosci: Official J Soc Neurosci 2014;34:10798–807

18. Abbas K, Shenk TE, Poole VN, Breedlove EL, Leverenz LJ, Nauman EA, Talavage TM, Robinson ME Alteration of default mode network in high school football athletes due to repetitive subconcussive mild traumatic brain injury: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain connectivity 2015;5: 91-101

19. Talavage TM, Nauman EA, Breedlove EL, Yoruk U, Dye AE, Morigaki KE, Feuer H, Leverenz LJ. Functionally-detected cognitive impairment in high school football players without clinically-diagnosed concussion. Journal of Neurotrauma 2014;31:327-338

20. Sharp DJ, Scott G, Leech R. Network dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol 2014;10:156-66

21. Wintermark M, Sanelli PC, Anzai Y, Tsiouris AJ, Whitlow CT. Imaging evidence and recommendations for traumatic brain injury: advanced neuro- and neurovascular imaging techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:e1-e11.

22. Wintermark M, Coombs L, Druzgal TJ, Field AS, Filippi CG, Hicks R, Horton R, Lui YW, Law M, Mukherjee P, Norbash A, Riedy G, Sanelli PC, Stone JR, Sze G, Tilkin M, Whitlow CT, Wilde EA, York G, Provenzale JM. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) imaging research roadmap. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:E12-23



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)