Synopsis
MRI is
unparalleled in its ability to visualize anatomical structure and function
non-invasively. To overcome the low sensitivity inherent in inductive detection
of weakly polarized nuclear spins, the vast majority of clinical MRI scanners
employ massive superconducting Tesla-scale magnets with strict infrastructure
demands that preclude truly portable operation. We describe here a simple,
non-cryogenic approach to high-performance human MRI at ultra-low magnetic
field using undersampled b-SSFP at 6.5 mT. We contend that practical ultra-low magnetic-field
implementations of MRI (< 10 mT) will complement traditional MRI, providing
clinically relevant images and setting new standards for affordable and robust
portable devices.Highlights
• Fast non-field-cycled non-cryogenic ULF MRI is possible in
a simple platform
• Coil design in the Johnson noise-dominated regime is
different from the usual body-noise dominated
• Increased fractional B0 homogeneity at ULF allows b-SSFP
over large FOVs in simple magnets.
• Low magnetic susceptibility allows for imaging around
implants
• Strategies for contrast at ULF include quantitative MRF.
• Opportunities for in vivo Overhauser DNP exist at ULF.
Specialty area: Portable MRI
Speaker name: Matthew S. Rosen, mrosen@cfa.harvard.edu
Target audience: MRI scientists
Outcome/Objectives: Attendees will gain insight into
strategies for efficient signal acquisition at ultra-low field MRI, as well as new
opportunities for purpose-built portable scanners operating in the millitesla
regime.
Purpose: This presentation is intended to provide a
understanding of the need for different approaches to to MRI at high- and ultra-low
field, both in terms of hardware, acquisition strategies, and approaches to
contrast.
Background
MRI is a powerful, non-invasive technique for revealing the
internal structure and function of the human body with a rich range of
biological contrasts. Despite considerable improvements in imaging quality and
speed, the underlying technology remains remarkably unchanged compared to the
first generation scanners that emerged on the market 30 years ago. The fact
that very strong Tesla-scale magnetic fields are needed to overcome the intrinsic
lack of sensitivity of NMR-based methods continues to dominate scanner construction,
and drives both pricing and scanner siting requirements. These massive magnets
preclude truly portable operation in many environments including surgical
intervention, triage and primary care suites.
A promising approach to portable MRI is operation ultra-low
magnetic field where scalable electromagnets become practical. The ultra-low
field (ULF) regime is defined [1] when the magnetic field used
for signal detection is below 10 mT. Operation at ULF enables imaging in
environments where high magnetic fields would be contraindicated (such as in the
presence of nearby ferrous materials), and raises the potential for scanners to
be built at significantly reduced total cost, and with open geometry designs
that ease patient handling and positioning.
In an effort to improve the performance of operation at low
and ultra-low magnetic field, Macovski and Conolly introduced the concept of pre-polarized
MRI (also known as PMRI) in 1993 [2], which employs a strong,
inhomogeneous pulsed magnet field to generate increased nuclear polarization, and
a second much weaker homogeneous magnetic field for signal detection. This PMRI
strategy has been the acquisition strategy for nearly all low- and ultra-low
field MRI systems since its introduction, however pre-polarized ULF MRI suffers
from intrinsically long acquisition times, most of which is uncompressible,
that result from the time needed to generate nuclear polarization.
In our recently published work [3], we demonstrate a novel approach
to fast and efficient brain ULF MRI at 6.5 mT with no pre-polarization nor
cryogenics, combining under-sampling strategies with a high performance fully
refocused steady-state-based acquisition on a simple, inexpensive platform (Fig.
1). With a novel inductive single channel detector, and robust hardware, we
have achieved the fastest 3D MRI of the living human brain in the ULF regime
compared to the state-of-the-art as reported in the literature [4]-[8].
Methods
Ultra-low field acquisition strategy:
High performance imaging at ultra-low magnetic field focuses
on substantially reducing acquisition time using fast imaging techniques. This
is especially important when significant signal averaging is required as a
result of low Boltzmann polarization. Our approach to fast imaging at ULF is 3D
balanced steady state free precession sequences (b-SSFP) [9]. Unlike traditional gradient-
and spin-echo techniques, b-SSFP sequences dynamically refocus spin
magnetization following measurement (Fig. 2), eliminating the extra delays
typically used for T2 decay and T1 recovery. This considerably reduces acquisition
times and provides the highest SNR per unit time of all imaging sequences [9], [10]. Our use of undersampled
b-SSFP at very low magnetic field is a a powerful strategy for high-speed MRI
at 6.5 mT, and allows us to achieve more than a 100-fold time savings compared
to traditional gradient echo imaging in this regime [11].
Balanced sequences are very sensitive to the amount of spin
dephasing that occurs between consecutive RF pulses (the pulse repetition time,
TR), and typical banding artifacts are expected to appear within a range of ±1/(2*TR)
Hz that result from inhomogeneity in the static magnetic field [9]. This sets a strict
requirement on the absolute magnetic field homogeneity over the field-of-view (FOV),
which for operation at 3 T is a very challenging sub-PPM level. In the ULF regime, however, the fractional
homogeneity requirement is three orders of magnitude lower, significantly easing
the engineering burden for low-field magnet design. In our system, a TR=22.5 ms
is completely immune to banding artifacts for up to 160 ppm inhomogeneity
at 6.5 mT. Furthermore, magnetic susceptibility differences are significantly
reduced at ULF, preventing off-resonance b-SSFP artifacts. As a result,
provided reasonable magnetic field homogeneity, b-SSFP at very low magnetic
field alleviates the necessity of ultra-short TRs and provides good image
quality over a large FOV without the need for sophisticated ultrafast gradient
power amplifiers.
RF Coil design:
The design of inductive detection coils for use in ULF MRI
presents a different set of challenges to those present in conventional
high-field MRI. In particular, issues of coil resistance and probe bandwidth manifest
differently. In conventional MRI, the dominant source of noise is the presence
of small currents in the lossy sample (the so-called “body noise” regime) to
which a characteristic sample resistance RS is attributed. Both the sample and
the coil contribute to Johnson noise but in practice RS is much larger than the
coil resistance RC (i.e. RS>>RC), and thus RC can be neglected in SNR
calculations. However, at low field, RS becomes much smaller and RC becomes the
dominant noise contribution (i.e., the so-called Johnson noise dominated
regime). To minimize the coil resistance in a simple design, larger diameter wire
or stranded litz wire can be used, but one needs to consider the impact this
has on coil bandwidth. Given the maximum imaging gradient strength of ~ 1 mT/m attainable
in our 6.5 mT scanner, a 20 cm (head-sized) FOV will span a frequency encode
bandwidth of ~ 10 kHz. This sets the minimum bandwidth needed for the detection
circuit so as to not significantly convolve the coil response function with the
object being imaged. At our Larmor frequency of 276 kHz, this corresponds to a
maximum coil Q of ~30. A single channel 30 turn inductive coil for operation at
276 kHz (Fig. 3) was designed and built using 3D printing fused deposition
modeling technology and multi-strand litz wire[12]. The hemispheric spiral
design results in a very homogeneous magnetic field [13], [14] over the volume of interest
that is everywhere orthogonal to our transverse main magnetic field B0, making
it suitable for both RF transmit and receive. The number of turns in the coil
was chosen to obtain the inductance needed to obtain the desired Q.
In addition to high-efficiency and homogeneity, this coil
design is well suited for imaging in a forward deployed trauma setting, as the
coil former can be printed in customized sizes for various head sizes or to
ensure compatibility with broad classes of head pathology in trauma settings and
with access holes so as to not impact workflow or interfere with other critical
monitoring devices.
Results
Three-dimensional under-sampled images acquired at 6.5 mT in
6 minutes are shown in Fig 4 for each of the three spatial orientations (axial,
coronal, and sagittal). In the brain, the two hemispheres and the cerebellum are
distinct, and cortical tissue can be distinguished from white matter. Liquid
compartments, here CSF, appear in bright grey and white. In b-SSFP, contrast is
related to the ratio of the imaged sample [9]. At high field, liquids and
tissue typically have rather different relaxation times but at 6.5 mT their
ratio (T2/T1)
is of order unity resulting in the distinct PD-weighted contrast shown.
As described above, the reduced fractional homogeneity
requirement of b-SSFP in the ULF regime is a key feature for neurocritical
care. Shown in Fig. 5 are axial images acquired at 3 T and 6.5 mT scanner in a
subject who had had undergone surgical brain resection of the right
frontoparietal cortex following open head trauma, and a methyl methacrylate
prosthesis covered by titanium mesh was placed following resection. Very
significant reduction of magnetic susceptibility artifact due to the titanium
mesh is observed in the ULF images, and we see that the degree of brain
resection is markedly over-estimated at 3 T. ULF MRI is compatible with metallic
objects in the head from a safety perspective, and in addition enables imaging
in the presence of these materials and visualization of tissue health in
regions that would otherwise be obscured by phase aberration leading to lack of
image intensity. We speculate that low field MRI will also provide more
accurate imaging of penetrating TBI in the presence of bullets and shrapnel.
Discussion
Our imaging work at 6.5 mT demonstrates the shortest
acquisition times and highest SNR per unit time in ULF MRI to date owing to our
use of modern sparse sampling strategies and a fully refocused sequence in an
optimized electromagnet scanner. These images were acquired without pre-polarization
techniques, at a fixed magnetic field and with a simple single channel inductive
detector. With an eye towards optimization, we note that for a given spatial
resolution, the minimum TR—and consequently the total scan time—is limited by
the maximum attainable time-integrated gradient strength. The maximum gradient
strength in the LFI is currently ~1 mT·m-1, resulting in a minimum TR of
~23 ms. Weak gradients especially impact phase encoding in balanced sequences
like b-SSFP, as every phase-encode pulse is paired with an opposite polarity
rewinding pulse. An increase in gradient strength would allow shorter phase
encode pulses, thus decreasing total imaging time while maintaining SNR, provided
that image distortion from non-linear magnetic fields that accompany the
desired encoding gradient (the so called “concomitant field” artifacts [15]) can be mitigated. At
6.5 mT, an increase in gradient strength in the range of 2-5×, combined with
efficient strategies to eliminate concomitant field artifacts [16]-[18], can reasonably be
envisioned.
A key challenge in obtaining clinically relevant MRI images
at ULF is the ability to acquire T1 and/or T2 relaxation-weighted images, and
thereby provide contrast to different types of tissue. Typically, magnetization
prepared gradient-echo, and spin-echo sequences are used to obtain
relaxation-weighted images, but these types of imaging experiments become
prohibitively time consuming at ultra-low magnetic fields where signal
averaging and recovery of the longitudinal magnetization are required. To this,
we believe that b-SSFP-based “magnetic resonance fingerprinting” (MRF) [19] is an ideal strategy to
obtain contrast at ULF, and have shown some very encouraging preliminary results
at 6.5 mT [20].
We contend that ULF MRI scanners operating at this expected level
of performance could complement traditional MRI by relieving hospital congestion
and shortening triage delays. Outside of the radiology suite, mobile ULF scanners
might be deployable during military conflicts or during sport events and enable
the acquisition of immediate after-trauma knowledge, typically in the case of
traumatic brain injuries. Finally, ULF MRI technology may allow resource-poor
environments access to MRI systems, without the strict siting requirements and high
costs of conventional scanners.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the U.S. Army Medical
Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC), Defense Medical Research and
Development Program (DMRDP) award W81XWH-11-2-0076 (DM09094). This research was
carried out at the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at
the Massachusetts General Hospital, using resources provided by the Center for
Functional Neuroimaging Technologies, P41EB015896, a P41 Biotechnology
Resource Grant supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and
Bioengineering (NIBIB), National Institutes of Health. References
[1] J. Robert Kraus, M. Espy, P. Magnelind,
and P. Volegov, Ultra-Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Oxford University
Press, 2014.
[2] A. Macovski
and S. Conolly, “Novel approaches to low-cost MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,
vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 221–230, Aug. 1993.
[3] M.
Sarracanie, C. D. LaPierre, N. Salameh, D. E. J. Waddington, T. Witzel, and M.
S. Rosen, “Low-Cost High-Performance MRI,” Sci Rep, vol. 5, pp. 15177, Oct.
2015.
[4] P. E.
Magnelind, J. J. Gomez, A. N. Matlashov, T. Owens, J. H. Sandin, P. L. Volegov,
and M. A. Espy, “Co-Registration of Interleaved MEG and ULF MRI Using a 7
Channel Low-Tc SQUID System,” Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 456–460, Jun. 2011.
[5] P. T.
Vesanen, J. O. Nieminen, K. C. J. Zevenhoven, J. Dabek, L. T. Parkkonen, A. V.
Zhdanov, J. Luomahaara, J. Hassel, J. Penttilä, J. Simola, A. I. Ahonen, J. P.
Mäkelä, and R. J. Ilmoniemi, “Hybrid ultra-low-field MRI and
magnetoencephalography system based on a commercial whole-head neuromagnetometer,”
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1795–1804, Jul. 2012.
[6] B. Inglis, K.
Buckenmaier, P. SanGiorgio, A. F. Pedersen, M. A. Nichols, and J. Clarke, “MRI
of the human brain at 130 microtesla,” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 48, pp. 19194–19201,
2013.
[7] I. Savukov and
T. Karaulanov, “Magnetic-resonance imaging of the human brain with an atomic
magnetometer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 103, no. 4, p. 043703, Jul. 2013.
[8] M. A. Espy, P. E. Magnelind, A. N. Matlashov, S. G. Newman, H. J. Sandin, L. J. Schultz, R. Sedillo, A. V. Urbaitis, and P. L. Volegov, “Progress Toward a Deployable SQUID-Based Ultra-Low Field
MRI System for Anatomical Imaging,” Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions
on, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1–5, Jun. 2015.
[9] K. Scheffler
and S. Lehnhardt, “Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques,” European
Radiology, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2409–2418, Nov. 2003.
[10] A. Oppelt, R.
Graumann, H. Barfuss, H. Fischer, W. Hartl, and W. Schajor, “FISP—a new fast
MRI sequence,” Electromedica, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 15–18, 1986.
[11] M. Sarracanie,
B. D. Armstrong, J. Stockmann, and M. S. Rosen, “High speed 3D overhauser-enhanced
MRI using combined b-SSFP and compressed sensing,” Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 735–745, Feb. 2014.
[12] C. D.
LaPierre, M. Sarracanie, D. E. J. Waddington, and M. S. Rosen, “A single
channel spiral volume coil for in vivo imaging of the whole human brain at 6.5
mT,” presented at the Intl Soc Mag Res Med, Toronto, 2015.
[13] M. D. Harpen,
“The spherical birdcage resonator,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969), vol.
94, no. 3, pp. 550–556, Oct. 1991.
[14] J. E. Everett
and J. E. Osemeikhian, “Spherical coils for uniform magnetic fields,” J. Sci. Instrum.,
vol. 43, no. 7, p. 470, 1966.
[15] C. T. Sica and
C. H. Meyer, “Concomitant gradient field effects in balanced steady-state free
precession,” 2007.
[16] W. R. Myers,
M. Mößle, and J. Clarke, “Correction of concomitant gradient artifacts in experimental
microtesla MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 274–284,
Dec. 2005.
[17] P. L. Volegov,
J. C. Mosher, M. A. Espy, and R. H. Kraus Jr, “On concomitant gradients in
low-field MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 103–113,
Jul. 2005.
[18] J. O. Nieminen
and R. J. Ilmoniemi, “Solving the problem of concomitant gradients in
ultra-low-field MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 207, no. 2, pp.
213–219, 2010.
[19] D. Ma, V.
Gulani, N. Seiberlich, K. Liu, J. L. Sunshine, J. L. Duerk, and M. A. Griswold,
“Magnetic resonance fingerprinting,” Nature, vol. 495, no. 7440, pp. 187–192,
Mar. 2013.
[20] M. Sarracanie,
O. Cohen, and M. S. Rosen, “3D Balanced-EPI Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting
at 6.5 mT,” presented at the Experimental NMR Conference, Asilomar, 2015.