Synopsis
Muscle denervation syndromes have a broad variety of
peripheral nerve disorders where MR imaging can be a helpful adjunct in clinical
diagnosis, therapy planning and follow-up.
Muscle
denervation syndromes represent one cause of many different muscular disorders.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the main imaging modality which is used for
the assessment of muscle denervation syndromes. In the early phase increased
high T2 signal or increased STIR signal is the main imaging finding. Subsequent
findings over time include atrophy of the muscle as well as increased T1 signal
representing fatty atrophy.
Differential
diagnosis of increased high T2 signal on MRI carries an extremely broad
differential. They include: trauma, early myositis ossificans, inflammatory
myopathies such as dermatomyositis, polymyositis, eosinophilic myositis,
proliferative myositis, or myositis associated with connecting connective
tissue diseases, infectious myositis, infiltrating neoplasm, rhabdomyolysis,
muscle infarction, sickle cell disease, or overuse syndromes.
A
very frequent finding however is a neurogenic cause of muscular edema
consistent with early denervation muscle syndrome. Many neurogenic disorders
can cause a muscle denervation syndrome. These include but are not exclusively
limited to:
1.
systemic diseases, such as
ischemia, vasculitis, toxic, endocrine and metabolic disorders such as diabetes
amyotrophy, hereditary motor-sensory neuropathies, amyloidosis, hyperlipidemia,
acute and chronic demyelinating inflammatory neuropathies, etc.
2. local
conditions, such as plexopathy, nerve injury, perineural compressive lesions, adhesive
neuropathy in failed tunnel cases, infections and nerve sheath tumors, etc.
3.
neuropathies related to functional
anatomical changes, such as habitual leg crossing, repeated typing and
repetitive exercise, which may cause traction mononeuritis or compressive
neuropathy in functional compartment syndromes.
The
role of MRI in these conditions needs to
be understand:
1.
In systemic nerve diseases, MRI
is not expected to make these diagnoses. However, MRI may be used to confirm
the clinical suspicion by demonstrating abnormality of the innervating and
regional muscle denervation changes or, exclude any structural cause for mononeuropathy
in these cases.
2. In
local conditions, MRI has a major role in these cases as it supplements
information gained from the clinical exam and electrodiagnostic tests or
provides information, which may not be possible to attain from other
modalities.
3.
In neuropathies related to
functional anatomical changes, the role of MRI is limited. This group is mostly
diagnosed on clinical basis and pressure catheter studies. However, rarely, MRI
may be used in clinically confounding cases with imaging performed before and
after the exercise/effort in question. Indirect signs such as significant prolongation
of T2 signal intensity within the muscle compartment may aid in the diagnosis
of compartment syndrome.
Muscle
denervation syndrome, however, may also be caused by a variety of nerve
diseases that can be divided into divided such that are based on the anatomic
site (tissue) of affliction (neuromuscular junction or nerve- cell body, axon
and myelin sheath) or functional involvement (sensory, motor or autonomic).
Neuromuscular
junction (NMJ) disorders are primarily related to acetylcholine receptor
abnormalities. These disorders could be familial/congenital (myasthenia gravis)
or acquired, such as drug induced, botulism or paraneoplastic (Eaton-Lambert
syndrome). Unlike most neuromuscular disorders that present with predominant
involvement of lower extremities early in the course of disease, the neuromuscular
junction disorders present with facial and extraocular muscle weakness, normal
tendon reflexes and sensation. The electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction
studies (NCV) are also normal in neuromuscular junction disorders. The nerve
diseases distal to the NMJ disorders lead to motor weakness, sensory symptoms
and autonomic symptoms depending upon the nerve involved. EMG and NCV studies
are usually positive. With predominant axonal involvement, distribution of
involvement and clinical presentation is usually distal>proximal, and
legs>arms. Nerve biopsy may be useful in axonal and myelin disorders. The
pathologist usually classifies the histologic alterations as axonal neuropathy,
demyelinating neuropathy, inflammatory neuropathy, or as a process of the
supporting and/or vascular tissues, such as vasculitis, storage disease, and
infectious or neoplastic infiltration. In most specimens, the pathology
features are not specific to a certain disease entity and must be correlated
with clinical, electrodiagnostic, and imaging information to derive a correct
diagnosis.
Myopathies
(muscular dystrophy/myositis) may result from infectious, endocrine, metabolic,
autoimmune, myoglobinuria or familial causes, such as limb-girdle syndrome. Myopathies
present with isolated motor symptoms and the distribution is usually proximal
and symmetric with absent tendon reflexes in the involved muscles. EMG is
usually positive and on serologic exams, there are high creatine kinase levels
in myopathies. Muscle biopsy is often used to make this diagnosis. MRI exams
will show one or a combination of edema like signal intensity changes on T2-weighted
fat suppressed MR images, fatty infiltration or atrophy depending upon the
stage of the disease, similar to denervation muscle changes. However, the
involved muscles may not correspond to single nerve territory and regional
nerves will show normal signal intensity, thereby excluding neuropathy as the
cause of muscle findings. Perimuscular fascial edema and enhancement may be
seen with myositis, which is absent with muscle denervation changes.
This
lecture will focus on the MR imaging features of muscle denervation syndromes,
the time course for the increased T2 signal, as well as for potential
differential diagnosis of a variety of etiologies imaging includes of course
peripheral nerve pathologies. Thus, this lecture will also cover, in parts, the
technique of peripheral nerve MR neurography.
Acknowledgements
Prof. Avneesh Chhabra for his constant help and collaboration.References
Chhabra A, Andreisek G. Magnetic Resonance
Neurography. Jaypee SP Medical Publsihers, London 2012