Synopsis
This presentation will explore parallel imaging methods and
how they can be used to accelerate MR image acquisition. Potential
artifacts and specific considerations for applying parallel imaging techniques
to body MRI will also be discussed. In addition to reviewing parallel imaging
techniques, clinical applications of parallel imaging will also be explored. Importantly,
recent advances in parallel imaging methodology that could benefit body MRI
protocols will be reviewed.Target Audience
Clinicians, researchers, and technologists who are interested in
parallel imaging and its application in body MRI.
Objectives
·
Understand parallel imaging methods and how
they can be used to accelerate image acquisition.
·
Identify potential artifacts and specific
considerations for applying parallel imaging techniques to body MRI.
·
Discuss clinical applications of parallel imaging.
·
Review recent advances in parallel imaging
techniques that could benefit body MRI protocols.
Abstract
Review of Parallel Imaging Concepts
Regardless of the clinical application, MRI acquisition
times are relatively long. These long scan times occur because there is an
inherent link between scan duration, the image field-of-view, and image
resolution. Large fields-of-view images at high spatial resolutions result in
long scan times because of how spatial encoding is performed in MRI. This is
particularly challenging in body MRI, where many protocols require much larger
volumetric coverage with high spatial resolutions. Additionally, body MRI scans
are frequently performed under breath hold to mitigate respiratory motion
artifacts, which limits the total possible scan length. In order to
successfully meet the various needs of body MRI scans, accelerated acquisition
methods are frequently considered.
Many techniques have focused on accelerating MRI
acquisitions by reducing the amount of spatial encoding needed to achieve the
desired image. Parallel imaging is an important technique that aims to reduce
the amount of spatial encoding by using spatial information provided by a
multi-coil array. These methods were introduced in the 1990s and early 2000s (1–3), and have since become
widely incorporated to reduce clinical scan times (4–6).
In parallel imaging acquisitions, data are accelerated by
skipping phase encoding lines. Scan time is directly proportional to the number
of phase encoding lines acquired. Thus, if half of the phase encoding lines are
skipped when acquiring an image, scan time is reduced by a factor of two. Although
this acquisition achieves the goal of reducing scan times, the increased
spacing between neighboring k-space lines results in a reduced field-of-view,
which causes aliasing in the phase encoding direction. Parallel imaging
reconstruction methods utilize additional information provided from a
multi-coil array to mitigate these aliasing artifacts. Each coil within the
array simultaneously acquires a separate image that is weighted by the
sensitivity of that coil. Because each coil has a different,
spatially-localized sensitivity across the field-of-view, this additional
spatial information can be used to reconstruct an unaliased image. There have
been many successful parallel imaging reconstructions proposed, but this review
will focus on two representative methods: SENSE (2) and GRAPPA (3). SENSE (Sensitivity
Encoding) is applied in the image domain to unfold aliasing artifacts caused by
the undersampling. GRAPPA (Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel
Acquisition) is applied in k-space to estimate the missing or skipped phase
encoding lines. Regardless of your choice of parallel imaging reconstruction
method, some additional information about the coil sensitivities is required to
perform the image reconstruction, and the acquisition of this coil sensitivity
information in body applications should be considered. Lastly, there are
practical limitations to the acceleration factor used for parallel imaging
reconstructions. It is important to note that all parallel reconstruction
methods result in a reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in comparison to a
fully-sampled image. In addition to this reduction of SNR, these methods suffer
from residual aliasing artifacts at high acceleration factors. These
limitations and potential artifacts will be covered in this review, and methods
to reduce or avoid these artifacts will also be discussed.
Application of Parallel Imaging to Body MRI
The gain in imaging speed achieved by parallel imaging can
be applied to body MRI (or any image acquisition) in several ways. Parallel
imaging can be used to reduce the scan time for each scan, which would reduce
breath hold times and improve patient comfort. Alternatively, the acceleration
provided by parallel imaging could be used to improve image resolution or extend
the field-of-view in the same scan duration. Lastly, there are some applications
where accelerating with parallel imaging can improve image quality. For
example, when echo planar imaging (EPI) is used for diffusion acquisitions,
accelerating with parallel imaging can reduce distortion artifacts resulting
from the readout (4).
Presentation Overview
This presentation will provide a review of parallel imaging
techniques and how they can be used to accelerate data acquisition in body MRI.
As mentioned previously, limitations and common artifacts of these techniques
will also be covered. Importantly, there are several recently proposed methods
that have improved upon or extended traditional parallel imaging techniques.
These include using alternative sampling patterns (such as CAIPIRINHA), combining
non-Cartesian trajectories with parallel imaging, combining view-sharing
methods with parallel imaging, and combining compressed sensing methods with
parallel imaging (7–12). These exciting new
directions and their application in body MRI will be discussed.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Sodickson DK,
Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging
with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn. Reson. Med. 1997;38:591–603.
2. Pruessmann KP,
Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.
Magn. Reson. Med. 1999;42:952–62.
3. Griswold MA, Jakob
PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A. Generalized
autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn. Reson. Med. 2002;47:1202–1210.
4. Deshmane A, Gulani
V, Griswold MA, Seiberlich N. Parallel MR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:55–72.
5. Blaimer M, Breuer F,
Mueller M, Heidemann RM, Griswold MA, Jakob PM. SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA:
how to choose the optimal method. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;15:223–36.
6. Larkman DJ, Nunes
RG. Parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007;52:R15–55.
7. Breuer FA, Blaimer
M, Mueller MF, Seiberlich N, Heidemann RM, Griswold MA, Jakob PM. Controlled
aliasing in volumetric parallel imaging (2D CAIPIRINHA). Magn. Reson. Med. 2006;55:549–56.
8. Chen Y, Lee GR,
Wright KL, Badve C, Nakamoto D, Yu A, Schluchter MD, Griswold MA, Seiberlich N,
Gulani V. Free-breathing liver perfusion imaging using 3-dimensional
through-time spiral generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition
acceleration. Invest. Radiol. 2015;50:367–375.
9. Chandarana H, Feng
L, Block TK, Rosenkrantz AB, Lim RP, Babb JS, Sodickson DK, Otazo R.
Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a
combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial
sampling. Invest. Radiol. 2013;48:10–6.
10. Zhang T, Yousaf U,
Hsiao A, Cheng JY, Alley MT, Lustig M, Pauly JM, Vasanawala SS. Clinical
performance of a free-breathing spatiotemporally accelerated 3-D time-resolved
contrast-enhanced pediatric abdominal MR angiography. Pediatr. Radiol. 2015;45:1635–1643.
11. Saranathan M,
Rettmann DW, Hargreaves BA, Clarke SE, Vasanawala SS. DIfferential subsampling
with cartesian ordering (DISCO): A high spatio-temporal resolution dixon
imaging sequence for multiphasic contrast enhanced abdominal imaging. J. Magn.
Reson. Imaging 2012;35:1484–1492.
12. Wright K, Chen Y, Saybasili H, Griswold MA,
Seiberlich N, Gulani V. Quantitative High-Resolution Renal Perfusion Imaging
Using 3-Dimensional Through-Time Radial Generalized Autocalibrating Partially
Parallel Acquisition. Invest. Radiol. 2014; 49(10):666-674.