Synopsis
Intra-operative
imaging has attracted a lot of interest in last decade. The use of the optic
microscopy in the operating room has revolutionized neurosurgery in general and
in particular microdissection of gliomas. Notwithstanding, intra-operative
objective determination of the extent of resection of gliomas remains a big challenge.
Recently
the issue of complete resection as a causal, not only prognostic factor for
overall survival in patients with GBM has been readdressed in a randomized
phase III 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) study. This study investigated
5-ALA-induced fluorescence as a tool for improving EOR and provided a very high
fraction of patients with postoperative MR imaging data acquired within 72
hours. Residual tumor in postoperative MR imaging was defined as tissue with a
volume of contrast enhancement greater than 0.175 cm3. Of the 243
GBM patients included in the ALA study 121 (49%) had incomplete resection and
122 (50.2%) had complete resection: the median overall survival was 11.8 months
in the former and 16.9 months in the latter group (Stummer et al., 2008). Long-term
survivors (> 24 months) were almost exclusively among patients of the
complete resection group.
The
EOR not only influences survival, but also the efficacy of adjuvant therapies.
The ALA cohort study provided for the first time Level 2b evidence that in GBM
as a single factor survival depends on complete resection of the enhancing tumor.
This level of evidence is inferior to randomized studies (Level 1) yet superior
to case-control studies (Level 3), case series (Level 4), or expert opinions
(Level 5).
In a more recent study (Stummer et al., 2011) it was reported
that extended resections performed using 5-ALA carries a greater risk of temporary
impairment of neurological function; patients with a greater risk of developing
permanent postoperative deficits were those with preoperative symptoms such as
aphasia unresponsive to steroids. The reason for preoperative neurological
deficits in those patients was more likely infiltration and destruction of
eloquent brain, rather than vasogenic edema. Thus, permanent neurological
deficits in patients may have resulted from resection of fluorescence-marked
tumor intermingled with functional eloquent brain tissue. This emphasizes again
the importance of identifying the anatomic boundaries of the lesion with
presurgical MR tractography and ultimately the functional limits with
subcortical IES. EOR has been shown to be an important predictor of overall survival
also in a series of 107 patients with recurrent GBM: if gross-total (> 95%
by volume) resection is achieved at recurrence, overall survival is maximized
regardless of initial EOR, suggesting that patients with initial subtotal
resection may benefit from additional surgery (Bloch et al., 2012).
Detection of functional boundaries
during surgery should be achieved with the aid of intraoperative
neurophysiology and supported by presurgical fMRI and MR diffusion tractography
(L Bello, Fava, Carrabba, Papagno, & Gaini, 2010). When a
temporary deficit is repeatedly elicited with direct subcortical intraoperative
electrical stimulation (IES) in the proximity of the wall of the surgical
cavity, the functional limits of the resection are reached and the resection in
that part of the tumor should be stopped. Identification of the functional
limits is critical especially in gliomas infiltrating the motor system, in
particular when the tumor involves the corticospinal tract (CST).
Intra-operative imaging with Magnetic
Resonance or Ultrasound (Prada F et al., 2014) has the ability to determine if a resection is
incomplete (Nimsky et al., Neurosurgery 2004). When this is the case, it is
possible to extend tumor resection during the same surgical procedure. However,
extention of resection may result in increased postoperative neurologic
deficits due to damage to eloquent brain structures. Damage to the primary
motor cortex or to the pyramidal tract may concern motor function; damage to
the ventral precentral gyrus (BA6) or to the arcuate fasciculus may concern
language function. Integration of functional presurgical data obtained with
magnetoencephalography and functional MR imaging into a intra-operative
navigational device for identification of eloquent brain areas has been shown
to reduce postoperative neurologic deficits (Nimsky C et al., Neurosurgery
2001) and surgery time (Petrella J et al., Radiology 2006). Display of MR
tractograms on the neuronavigational device in the operating room is valuable
when the neurosurgeon is evaluating the distance of a specific tract from the
surgical cavity and he uses subcortical ESM to test its functional relevance
(Bello L et al., Neuroimage 2008).
Intraoperative acquisition and real-time
display of the results of diffusion tensor imaging is feasible and it has been
shown that it can depict online shifting of the corticospinal tract that is
caused by surgical intervention (Nimsky et al., Radiology 2005).
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
Stummer
W et al., Neurosurgery 2008; 62(3),
564–76; discussion 564–76.
Stummer
W et al., Journal of Neurosurgery 2011; 114(3),
613–23.
Bloch
O et al., Journal of Neurosurgery, 117(6),
1032–1038.
Bello
L et al., Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2010; 35:113-57.
Prada F et al., Preoperative Magnetic Resonance and Intraoperative Ultrasound Fusion
Imaging for Real-Time Neuronavigation in Brain Tumor Surgery. Ultraschall in
Med?. 2014 - www.thieme.de - DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s- 0034-1385347
Nimsky C et al., Neurosurgery 2004; 55(2):358-70.
Nimsky C et al., Neurosurgery 2001;48(5):1082-9.
Petrella J et al., Radiology 2006; 240(3):793-802.
Bello L et al., Neuroimage 2008;39(1):369-82.
Nimsky
et al., Radiology 2005;234(1):218-25.