Synopsis
This presentation will review the MR appearance
of normal maturation of bone marrow, osteonecrosis, and features that will aid
in determining the underlying cause of bone marrow edema.Target Audience
Radiologists, imaging scientists and clinical
providers interested in understanding the MR imaging appearance of bone marrow,
osteonecrosis, and features that may help distinguish among bone marrow edema etiologies.
Outcome/Objectives
At the conclusion of the talk, the participant
should be able to:
·
Recognize the normal appearance
and maturation of bone marrow on MR imaging
·
Identify MR imaging
appearance of bone marrow edema
·
Describe several imaging
characteristics that can help distinguish among causes of bone marrow edema
Purpose
To review the expected MR appearance of bone
marrow and features of bone marrow edema that will help to differentiate among
etiologies.
Highlights
o
Bone marrow signal on MRI is
based on fat and water content
·
Red (cellular) marrow has low
T1 signal
·
Yellow (fatty) marrow has
high T1 signal
o
Bone marrow maturation occurs
in a recognizable pattern
·
Fatty replacement of red
marrow as we age
·
Occurs distal to proximal
·
Axial and
proximal appendicular skeleton maintain red marrow into adulthood
o
Bone marrow edema
·
Intermediate to high signal
on fluid sensitive sequences
o
Osteonecrosis
·
Recognizable by “double line”
sign on fluid sensitive sequences
Expected Appearance of Bone Marrow
Bone marrow is the fourth largest organ in the
body and contains the hematopoietic elements, stroma, and supporting trabeculae
providing both structural and hematologic support for the body. MR imaging appearance of bone marrow is
primarily dependent on fat and water signal, which differs between the red
marrow, containing the hematopoietic elements, and white marrow, containing
mostly fat. Specifically, red marrow
constitutes 40% fat and 40% water, while yellow marrow contains 80% fat [1]. This results in ample contrast on MR imaging,
especially on T1 where fat signal has a short T1 relaxation resulting in bright
signal on T1 imaging, whereas the red marrow signal has increased water content
due to greater cellularity that results in intermediate signal on T1, which is
generally higher than muscle signal, since it still contains 40% fat [1].
Maturation of Bone Marrow
To evaluate marrow on MR imaging, one must
recognize the normal expected appearance of marrow, which changes as we age and
is dependent on signal contribution from red and yellow marrow as discussed
above. When humans are born, the entire skeleton
is filled with red marrow. As we age,
much of the red marrow converts to yellow marrow and this occurs in a
characteristic pattern [1, 2]. Generally, this follows a distal to proximal
or appendicular to axial pattern though timing may differ among individuals. For example, the hands and feet are the first
body parts to convert to yellow marrow occurring by age 10 followed by the
tibia/fibula and radius/ulna. By the age of 25, most individuals are considered
skeletally mature with persistent red marrow in the axial skeleton, which
includes the head and spine, sternum, ribs, and proximal humeri and femurs [1, 2].
Pathologic Marrow
Pathologic
states can be identified generally by a deviation from the normal maturation
process of marrow or focal bone marrow edema.
Deviation from the normal bone marrow maturation is best identified on T1
MR imaging because of the high content of fat in bone marrow, especially in
areas of yellow marrow. Generally,
increased cellular marrow will have lower signal intensity on T1 imaging and
decreased cellular marrow will produce much higher T1 signal (more fat).
A
distinction that can help in identifying the etiology is whether the pathologic
process replaces the fat or infiltrates the bone marrow. Bone marrow replacing processes are typically
neoplastic or infectious in etiology [1-11]. On conventional imaging sequences, these
processes result in low T1 signal, lower than that of muscle or vertebral disc,
and intermediate to high signal on fluid sensitive sequences, such as short
inversion tau recovery (STIR), T2 imaging with fat suppression (T2fs), or
intermediate weighted proton density with fat suppression (PDfs). More
infiltrative processes that do not replace all fat and trabeculae in the marrow
tend to have intermediate T1 signal with retained trabeculae and intermixed fat. Many processes can result in this pattern, including
hematologic malignancy, red marrow reconversion, transient bone marrow edema,
transient osteoporosis, contusion or fracture, osteoarthritis, and inflammatory
arthropathy [3-6, 9, 10, 12-17]. Depending on the pattern of edema or
characteristic features, the etiology may be apparent with MR imaging [9, 13, 17-20]. For example, the “double line” sign is a
classic imaging finding with osteonecrosis and a linear focus of low T1 signal
with adjacent edema in a subchondral location is characteristic of a
subchondral fracture.
In
addition to bone marrow replacing and infiltrative processes, some processes
may make the bone marrow less cellular and result in increased marrow fat
content on imaging. For instance, poor
nutrition, osteoporosis, or radiation treatment can result in less cellularity
in the marrow.
Non-conventional MRI Sequences
For
problem solving, chemical shift imaging (CSI) or diffusion weighted imaging
(DWI) may be helpful to distinguish some etiologies [4, 7,
11, 21, 22]. With
CSI, a bone marrow lesion that loses greater than 20% of its signal from
in-phase images to out-of-phase images is a benign process. Using DWI, a lesion that has diffusion
restriction is either neoplastic or infectious.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the ISMRM program committee for inviting me to give this presentation.References
1. Vogler, J.B., 3rd and W.A.
Murphy, Bone marrow imaging.
Radiology, 1988. 168(3): p. 679-93.
2. Ricci, C., et al., Normal age-related patterns of cellular and
fatty bone marrow distribution in the axial skeleton: MR imaging study.
Radiology, 1990. 177(1): p. 83-8.
3. Hanrahan, C.J. and L.M.
Shah, MRI of spinal bone marrow: part 2,
T1-weighted imaging-based differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol,
2011. 197(6): p. 1309-21.
4. Grande, F.D., et al., Bone marrow lesions: A systematic diagnostic
approach. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2014. 24(3): p. 279-87.
5. Andrews, C.L., From the RSNA Refresher Courses.
Radiological Society of North America. Evaluation of the marrow space in the
adult hip. Radiographics, 2000. 20
Spec No: p. S27-42.
6. Wang, C.K., et al., Bone marrow edema in vertebral compression
fractures: detection with dual-energy CT. Radiology, 2013. 269(2): p. 525-33.
7. Zajick, D.C., Jr., et al.,
Benign and malignant processes: normal
values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow.
Radiology, 2005. 237(2): p. 590-6.
8. Allen, G.M., Dark t1 bone marrow. Semin Musculoskelet
Radiol, 2011. 15(3): p. 247-56.
9. O'Hare, A., et al., Bone marrow edema: patterns and clinical
implications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2006. 10(4): p. 249-57.
10. Toledano,
T.R., et al., MRI evaluation of bone
marrow changes in the diabetic foot: a practical approach. Semin
Musculoskelet Radiol, 2011. 15(3):
p. 257-68.
11. Vanel,
D., et al., MR imaging of bone metastases
and choice of sequence: spin echo, in-phase gradient echo, diffusion, and
contrast medium. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2009. 13(2): p. 97-103.
12. Boutry,
N., et al., Rapidly destructive
osteoarthritis of the hip: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002. 179(3): p. 657-63.
13. Rios,
A.M., et al., Bone marrow edema patterns
in the ankle and hindfoot: distinguishing MRI features. AJR Am J
Roentgenol, 2011. 197(4): p. W720-9.
14. Gil,
H.C., S.M. Levine, and A.C. Zoga, MRI
findings in the subchondral bone marrow: a discussion of conditions including
transient osteoporosis, transient bone marrow edema syndrome, SONK, and
shifting bone marrow edema of the knee. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2006. 10(3): p. 177-86.
15. Link,
T.M. and X. Li, Bone marrow changes in
osteoarthritis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2011. 15(3): p. 238-46.
16. Navas,
A. and A. Kassarjian, Bone marrow changes
in stress injuries. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2011. 15(3): p. 183-97.
17. Steinbach,
L.S. and K.J. Suh, Bone marrow edema
pattern around the knee on magnetic resonance imaging excluding acute traumatic
lesions. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2011. 15(3): p. 208-20.
18. Hayes,
C.W., et al., Mechanism-based pattern
approach to classification of complex injuries of the knee depicted at MR
imaging. Radiographics, 2000. 20
Spec No: p. S121-34.
19. Zanetti,
M., et al., Bone marrow edema pattern in
osteoarthritic knees: correlation between MR imaging and histologic findings.
Radiology, 2000. 215(3): p. 835-40.
20. Zbojniewicz,
A.M. and T. Laor, Focal Periphyseal Edema
(FOPE) zone on MRI of the adolescent knee: a potentially painful manifestation
of physiologic physeal fusion? AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011. 197(4): p. 998-1004.
21. Baur,
A., et al., Diffusion-weighted MR imaging
of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression
fractures. Radiology, 1998. 207(2):
p. 349-56.
22. Shah,
L.M. and C.J. Hanrahan, MRI of spinal
bone marrow: part I, techniques and normal age-related appearances. AJR Am
J Roentgenol, 2011. 197(6): p.
1298-308.