Synopsis
Metabolic imaging using hyperpolarised substances is
a relatively new research field looking at metabolic processes in the body
minimally invasive. In this educational talk, the basic principles of
dissolution dynamic nuclear polarisation are introduced. The most commonly used
substance is [1-13C]pyruvate, which gets taken up into the cells and converted
enzymatically into lactate, alanine and bicarbonate. Five dimensional MR encoding
is required to capture spectral, temporal and 3D spatial information.Hyperpolarising 13C-labelled molecules and imaging their fate in vivo enables insights into metabolic processes in the body minimally invasive. Magnetic
resonance imaging is intrinsically SNR limited due to the fact that only a few
ppm of spins are polarised in strong magnetic fields such as 3T. Different ways
exist to polarise spins outside of the MRI scanner using hyperpolarisation
techniques such as spin-exchange optical pumping (SEOP), parahydrogen-induced
polarisation (PHIP) or dynamic nuclear polarisation (DNP). Most commonly used
for polarising molecules and observing their fate in vivo is DNP, because of
its versatility and the commercial availability of polarisers. SEOP is mainly used for polarising gas for lung MRI, while PHIP is still limited in its in vivo applications.
Dynamic nuclear polarisation (DNP) in itself is already
fairly old, with publications dating back >30 years. The main innovation,
pioneered by a group of researchers in Malmö, is that it is possible to
dissolve a polarised sample, which is an amorphous glass at 1K, in hot water solution while retaining its polarisation [1]. The method
was optimised over the years, hence nowadays obtaining polarisation levels of
the dissolved solution of up to ~50%. DNP works by doping a sample (eg [1-13C]pyruvic
acid) with an electron paramagnetic agent, which contains an unpaired electron
in the inner shell. This sample is placed into a strong magnetic field
(typically 3.35T or 5T) in a liquid Helium bath. The Helium temperature is
lowered by pumping a vacuum to go down to temperatures of typically 0.8K-1.4K.
Electron spins are polarised by nearly 100% at this field and temperature. The
polarisation is transferred to 13C by irradiating with microwaves on the
resonance frequency of the electron spins. After typically 1-3 hours of
polarisation, the sample is moved out of the liquid
Helium bath and dissolved with a hot water-based solution. This solution decays
now rapidly with T1 and can be injected into animals or (after quality
assurance) into humans for various studies.
While a few groups built their own polarisers, the commercial
availability of dissolution DNP polarisers greatly eased entry to the field.
Most groups use one of the following two polarisers. The HyperSense is
optimised for in vitro and small-animal research due to its relatively simple
sample preparation and relatively small sample size. It was produced and sold
by OxfordInstruments (Oxford, UK). The SpinLab is prepared for human
experiments, due to sterility, larger dose, multiple-sample polarisation, and
is commercially available from GE (Milwaukee, WI, USA). It is not a clinical
device and research groups need to apply for their own approvals from the respective health
authorities, such as the FDA in the US.
In principle any nucleus in any molecule exhibiting a magnetic
spin can be polarised. However, there are practical limitations. First of all, the
longitudinal T1 relaxation must be long in order for the polarisation to be
retained in vivo; the gyromagnetic ratio should not be too low to ease the
imaging part; the substance must not be toxic for in vivo studies; if
metabolism is to be observed, it must be faster or at least in the range of T1
and resonances should not overlap to be distinguishable by spectroscopy; and the
substance must form an amorphous glass to be polarisable.
The most common substance for metabolic imaging currently is
[1-13C]pyruvate, which is a non-toxic, endogenous substance, easily
polarisable, with a long T1 (20s-80s), and a rapid and relevant metabolism [2].
It is converted intra-cellularly into lactate, alanine and bicarbonate, hence
yielding valuable insights into metabolic processes, and alterations during
disorders, such as cancer or ischemia. Although [1-13C]pyruvate is the
clinically most advanced substance, many others were investigated
pre-clinically as well for detecting a big variety of other processes [3,4]:
fumarate (cell necrosis), urea (perfusion + kidney function), acetate
(metabolism), bicarbonate (pH),etc. Furthermore, hyperpolarisation is not limited to 13C and nuclei such as 15N [5] or 29Si [6] have been polarised and studied in vivo using dissolution DNP as well.
Various things have to be taken into consideration for the
MRI side of hyperpolarisation. Most MRI scanners are optimised for 1H imaging.
Special hard- and software is required to image non-proton nuclei (commonly
called X-nuclei or multi-nuclear spectroscopy (MNS)). The MRI scanner needs broadband
capabilities for transmit and receive chain. Dedicated MNS coils tuned to 13C
and ideally also 1H for good anatomical scans are required. Because of the lower gyromagnetic ratio of 13C,
which is a quarter of 1H, gradient encoding is challenging and more RF power is
needed, while coil loading is worse.
Special MRI pulse sequences are required for metabolic
imaging. Boundary constraints are the non-recoverably (with T1 and excitation)
disappearing polarisation and the requirement to encode ideally five
dimensions: 3D spatial, 1D spectral and the temporal dynamics. Many different
techniques with their unique advantages and disadvantages have been developed
by multiple groups over the years. In general, the more encoding efficient a
sequence is, the less robust it becomes [7]. While many fast sequences exist,
which can potentially encode really high resolutions, the main limitation is
still SNR, hence leading to fairly low matrix sizes. Typical resolutions are in
the order of (½ cm)3. The choice of sequence
as of today is mostly subjective, and there is no consensus yet on which
sequence is ideal. After the acquisition, the data has to be reconstructed and
quantified. For [1-13C]pyruvate, most people commonly use the downstream
metabolite to pyruvate ratio, as this yields a semi-quantitative number related
to the conversion rate.
The field started its in vivo studies mostly in rat
experiments. Over the years, many different diseases (mostly in oncology,
cardiology and neurology) were investigated in various studies with many
different substances. The field is now moving towards clinical applications, with first human
studies being performed with hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate at multiple sites.
The various in vivo applications of hyperpolarisation will be the topic of the next
educational talk.
Acknowledgements
BMBF FKZ 13EZ1114; DFG SFB 824.
References
1) Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000
times in liquid-state NMR. Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Fridlund B, Gram A, Hansson G,
Hansson L, Lerche MH, Servin R, Thaning M, Golman K. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2003 Sep 2;100(18):10158-63.
2) Metabolic imaging by hyperpolarized 13C magnetic
resonance imaging for in vivo tumor diagnosis. Golman K, Zandt RI, Lerche M,
Pehrson R, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH. Cancer Res. 2006 Nov 15;66(22):10855-60.
3) Biomedical applications of hyperpolarized 13C
magnetic resonance imaging. Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Brindle KM. Progress in
NMR Spectroscopy. 2009; 55:285–295.
4) Chemistry and biochemistry of 13C hyperpolarized
magnetic resonance using dynamic nuclear polarization. Keshari KR, Wilson DM.
Chem Soc Rev. 2014 Mar 7;43(5):1627-59.
5) α-trideuteromethyl[15N]glutamine: A long-lived hyperpolarized perfusion marker.Durst M, Chiavazza E, Haase A, Aime S, Schwaiger M, Schulte RF.Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jan 29. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26104.
6) In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of hyperpolarized silicon particles.Cassidy MC, Chan HR, Ross BD, Bhattacharya PK, Marcus CM.Nat Nanotechnol. 2013 May;8(5):363-8.
7) Comparison of acquisition schemes for
hyperpolarised ¹³C imaging. Durst M, Koellisch U, Frank A, Rancan G, Gringeri
CV, Karas V, Wiesinger F, Menzel MI, Schwaiger M, Haase A, Schulte RF. NMR
Biomed. 2015 Jun;28(6):715-25.