Synopsis
Collagen plays a key
role in the structural behaviour of MSK tissues; however, it creates challenges
when imaging with MR. In this session, attendees will learn about the structure
and function of collagen rich MSK tissues, considerations when carrying out
quantitative MRI imaging (including short T2 relaxation times and the Magic
Angle Effect) and approaches to image post-processing.Target Audience
Medical professionals, researchers or MRI
technologists with an interest in quantitative MR imaging and image processing of
collagen rich musculoskeletal (MSK) tissues such as articular cartilage,
meniscus, tendons, ligaments and bone.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this presentation
participants will:
1. Be able to describe the structure and function
of collagen rich MSK tissues
2. Understand how collagen presence affects quantitative
MRI
3. Know which quantitative MRI parameters are used
to study MSK tissues
4. Understand some technical considerations of
processing quantitative MRI data
Overview
Collagen is an
integral component of several MSK tissues including articular cartilage,
meniscus, tendons, ligaments and bone.
Both the amount and organization of the collagen affects the tissue’s
function and MRI relaxation properties.
Collagen is a short string-like protein that provides structural support
to tissues, analogous to the steel bars (rebar) in reinforced concrete. This highlights the great importance of
collagen because the major functions of MSK tissues are to facilitate motion
and transmit forces. Collagen itself has
a very short T
2 relaxation time, making it challenging to image. Its proportional amount and orientation
dictate the overall T
2 relaxation time of the particular tissue. The magic angle effect must be considered
when imaging MSK tissues because orientation of collagen fibers at approximately
55° from
the main magnetic field results in an increase in the T
2 relaxation time in
that region
1.
Collagen orientation matters – know your tissue structure
The orientation of
collagen in MSK tissues not only matters for MRI imaging but also for overall function. The orientation is directly related to how
forces are transmitted through the tissues.
Therefore, by understanding this relationship one can easily remember
the collagen orientation.
Articular Cartilage: Articular cartilage covers the surfaces of
long bones; it provides a smooth bearing surface that allows near frictionless
motion and resists both compressive and shear forces. It is
primarily composed of collagen, proteoglycans and water and is often described
as having three zones. The superficial
zone, approximately top 20%, has the highest proportion of collagen content
(about 85% dry weight)2 and the collagen fibers are oriented
tangentially to resist shear forces. In
the middle zone (approximately mid 50%)2, the collagen fibers are randomly oriented
and, along with proteoglycans and osmotic swelling pressure, resist compressive
forces. Finally, the deep zone
(approximately bottom 30%)2, the collagen fibers are oriented
perpendicular to the bone-cartilage interface and act to anchor the cartilage
to the bone.
Meniscus: The menisci of the knee improve congruence between the femur and tibia,
increasing the area over which forces can be transmitted. They have a semi-lunar shape and a
wedge-like cross section. Collagen makes
up over 80% of the dry weight with most fibers oriented in the circumferential
direction2. This
organization generates hoop stresses in the meniscus when axial loads are
applied.
Tendons: Tendons attach muscle to bone
and therefore must transmit the large forces generated by muscle. They are predominantly composed of highly aligned
collagen fibers along the length of the tissue.
Ligaments: Ligaments attach bone to bone and serve the purpose of guiding
motion. They are also composed of
aligned collagen fibers but are more randomly oriented than tendons. This means they have more ‘stretch’ than
tendons.
Bone: The role of bone is to facilitate motion and provide protection to organs
and tissues. While bone is composed of
mainly minerals, it also contains a great amount of collagen (approximately 45%
by weight)2.
It should be noted
that collagen content and structure may be altered with disease. For example, in articular cartilage, collagen
content decreases and remaining collagen becomes disorganized
osteoarthritis. This highlights that collagen is
an important biomarker of tissue health and is why imaging collagen with MRI is
so important in MSK.
Collagen and quantitative MRI: the short and the magic of it
Collagen is the most
common protein in the body3. Each
collagen molecule consists of three polypeptide chains that together form a
triple helix. Collagen is quite stiff,
making it an ideal reinforcing material.
Water is present both between and outside the chains; not surprisingly,
it has been shown that the outer water protons are considerably more mobile
than the inner water protons4. This
results in complex, multicomponent relaxation behaviour.
We must remember that
collagen is just one component of MSK tissues; thus, relaxation behaviour
becomes even more complex. For example, as mentioned above articular cartilage
is composed of collagen, proteoglycan and water and it has been shown to have
three components at approximately 2.3, 25.2 and 96.3 ms5. If we
fit a single T2 relaxation time using a mono-exponential fit, as is commonly
done in MSK work, we are obtaining an overall T2 relaxation time not specific
to the collagen in the tissue. Because
of differences in content, relaxation times vary greatly between MSK
tissues. For example, at 3 Tesla,
approximate T2* relaxation times are in the range of 1, 2, 10, and 20 ms, for
bone, tendon, meniscus and cartilage, respectively6-9.
When collagen is
oriented at approximately 55° from the main magnetic field (B0), an
erroneous increase in T2 is observed; this is called the Magic Angle Effect. It is most commonly observed in T2-weighted
scans of the knee in the posterior femoral condyle cartilage region. The magic angle can be a source of artifact
in T2, T2* and T1ρ
relaxation time mapping but can also be an advantage when trying to determine
the orientation of collagen fibers in a tissue1, 10.
Quantitative MRI is
proving to be very useful in research studies of MSK diseases such as
osteoarthritis. T2, T2* and T1ρ relaxation times are
higher in the cartilage and meniscus of patients with osteoarthritis and ACL
injury6, 11, 12. While
standard quantitative MRI sequences can be used to study cartilage, ultra-short
echo time sequences are required for studying bone, tendons and ligaments. Ultra-short
echo time sequences can be used to study the meniscus; however, modified
standard sequences are likely also sufficient given its ~10ms relaxation time. Other quantitative MRI approaches such as
sodium MRI, susceptibility mapping and magnetization transfer are also valuable
in studying MSK tissues, although their use has been limited to date13-15.
So you have the images, now what?
Image processing is one
of the greatest challenges of quantitative MRI of MSK tissues. The first step is ensuring that the source
images have sufficient SNR for the subsequent analysis; it has been shown that
this value is approximately 20
16. The
next step is segmenting the desired tissues from the source images. With three-dimensional sequences we obtain a
vast amount of data but extracting it can be very difficult since no reliable
automated segmentation tool exists for MSK.
As a result most studies analyze a single slice or a few slices in each
tissue or plate; however, by doing this it is possible that a diseased focal
region is excluded from the analysis. Next,
a signal model is used to generate the quantitative parameter maps. It is
essential to assess the quality of the data fitting procedure; often this is
not reported but it should be carried out and it would be very useful if it were
reported. Once a map is obtained again,
there is a vast amount of data. Most
often mean values for the structure or sub-region are calculated; however, some
groups do carry out texture or cluster analyses to isolate patterns or defects
within the tissues
17, 18. While
this is not an exhaustive list of post-processing factors to consider, it does highlight
some main challenges currently faced by researchers carrying out quantitative
MRI research of collagen rich MSK tissues.
Summary
The presence of
collagen complicates quantitative MRI assessments of MSK tissues but it also plays
a very important functional role. As
long as images are acquired, processed and interpreted with care, valid and
reliable data can be obtained for research studies.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Bydder, M., et al., The magic angle effect: a source of artifact,
determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson
Imaging, 2007. 25(2): p. 290.
2. Mow,
V.C., et al., Basic Orthopaedic
Biomechanics and Mechano-Biology, in Biomechanicsl
of Bone, R. Wuiskes and B.V. Rietbergen, Editors. 2005, Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins: Philidelphia.
3. Seeley,
R.R., et al., Anatomy and Physiology,
in Skeletal System: Bones and Bone Tissue,
R.R. Seeley, T.D. Stephens, and P. Tate, Editors. 2000, McGraw-Hill: North
America.
4. Berendsen,
H.J.C., Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study
of Collagen Hydration. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1962. 36(12): p. 3297.
5. Reiter,
D.A., et al., Multicomponent T2
relaxation analysis in cartilage. Magn Reson Med, 2009. 61(4): p. 803.
6. Williams,
A., et al., UTE-T2 * mapping detects
sub-clinical meniscus injury after anterior cruciate ligament tear.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2012. 20(6):
p. 486.
7. Wang,
K., et al., k-space water-fat
decomposition with T2* estimation and multifrequency fat spectrum modeling for
ultrashort echo time imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010. 31(4): p. 1027.
8. Williams,
A., et al., UTE-T2 * mapping of human
articular cartilage in vivo: a repeatability assessment. Osteoarthritis
Cartilage, 2011. 19(1): p. 84.
9. Chen,
J., et al., Evaluation of bound and pore
water in cortical bone using ultrashort-TE MRI. NMR Biomed, 2015. 28(12): p. 1754.
10. Szeverenyi,
N.M., et al., Dipolar anisotropy fiber
imaging in a goat knee meniscus. Magn Reson Med, 2011. 65(2): p. 463.
11. Zarins,
Z.A., et al., Cartilage and meniscus
assessment using T1rho and T2 measurements in healthy subjects and patients
with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2010. 18(11): p. 1408.
12. Carballido-Gamio,
J., et al., Spatial analysis of magnetic
resonance T1rho and T2 relaxation times improves classification between
subjects with and without osteoarthritis. Med Phys, 2009. 36(9): p. 4059.
13. Staroswiecki,
E., et al., In vivo sodium imaging of
human patellar cartilage with a 3D cones sequence at 3 T and 7 T. J Magn
Reson Imaging, 2010. 32(2): p. 446.
14. Stikov,
N., et al., Cross-relaxation imaging of
human articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med, 2011. 66(3): p. 725.
15. Nissi,
M.J., et al., Improved Visualization of
Cartilage Canals Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping. PLoS One, 2015.
10(7): p. e0132167.
16. Raya,
J.G., et al., T2 measurement in articular
cartilage: impact of the fitting method on accuracy and precision at low SNR.
Magn Reson Med, 2010. 63(1): p. 181.
17. Joseph,
G.B., et al., Texture analysis of
cartilage T2 maps: individuals with risk factors for OA have higher and more
heterogeneous knee cartilage MR T2 compared to normal controls--data from the
osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Res Ther, 2011. 13(5): p. R153.
18. Monu,
U.D., et al. Cluster Analysis for T2 and
T1rho Relaxation Times using 3D Projection Maps of the Femoral Condyle in a
Healthy and ACL-injured Population. in 23st
Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2015. Toronto, Canada.