Relaxation Mechanisms in Collagen Rich MSK Systems
Emily McWalter1

1University of Saskatchewan

Synopsis

Collagen plays a key role in the structural behaviour of MSK tissues; however, it creates challenges when imaging with MR. In this session, attendees will learn about the structure and function of collagen rich MSK tissues, considerations when carrying out quantitative MRI imaging (including short T2 relaxation times and the Magic Angle Effect) and approaches to image post-processing.

Target Audience

Medical professionals, researchers or MRI technologists with an interest in quantitative MR imaging and image processing of collagen rich musculoskeletal (MSK) tissues such as articular cartilage, meniscus, tendons, ligaments and bone.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this presentation participants will:

1. Be able to describe the structure and function of collagen rich MSK tissues

2. Understand how collagen presence affects quantitative MRI

3. Know which quantitative MRI parameters are used to study MSK tissues

4. Understand some technical considerations of processing quantitative MRI data

Overview

Collagen is an integral component of several MSK tissues including articular cartilage, meniscus, tendons, ligaments and bone. Both the amount and organization of the collagen affects the tissue’s function and MRI relaxation properties. Collagen is a short string-like protein that provides structural support to tissues, analogous to the steel bars (rebar) in reinforced concrete. This highlights the great importance of collagen because the major functions of MSK tissues are to facilitate motion and transmit forces. Collagen itself has a very short T2 relaxation time, making it challenging to image. Its proportional amount and orientation dictate the overall T2 relaxation time of the particular tissue. The magic angle effect must be considered when imaging MSK tissues because orientation of collagen fibers at approximately 55° from the main magnetic field results in an increase in the T2 relaxation time in that region1.

Collagen orientation matters – know your tissue structure

The orientation of collagen in MSK tissues not only matters for MRI imaging but also for overall function. The orientation is directly related to how forces are transmitted through the tissues. Therefore, by understanding this relationship one can easily remember the collagen orientation.

Articular Cartilage: Articular cartilage covers the surfaces of long bones; it provides a smooth bearing surface that allows near frictionless motion and resists both compressive and shear forces. It is primarily composed of collagen, proteoglycans and water and is often described as having three zones. The superficial zone, approximately top 20%, has the highest proportion of collagen content (about 85% dry weight)2 and the collagen fibers are oriented tangentially to resist shear forces. In the middle zone (approximately mid 50%)2, the collagen fibers are randomly oriented and, along with proteoglycans and osmotic swelling pressure, resist compressive forces. Finally, the deep zone (approximately bottom 30%)2, the collagen fibers are oriented perpendicular to the bone-cartilage interface and act to anchor the cartilage to the bone.

Meniscus: The menisci of the knee improve congruence between the femur and tibia, increasing the area over which forces can be transmitted. They have a semi-lunar shape and a wedge-like cross section. Collagen makes up over 80% of the dry weight with most fibers oriented in the circumferential direction2. This organization generates hoop stresses in the meniscus when axial loads are applied.

Tendons: Tendons attach muscle to bone and therefore must transmit the large forces generated by muscle. They are predominantly composed of highly aligned collagen fibers along the length of the tissue.

Ligaments: Ligaments attach bone to bone and serve the purpose of guiding motion. They are also composed of aligned collagen fibers but are more randomly oriented than tendons. This means they have more ‘stretch’ than tendons.

Bone: The role of bone is to facilitate motion and provide protection to organs and tissues. While bone is composed of mainly minerals, it also contains a great amount of collagen (approximately 45% by weight)2.

It should be noted that collagen content and structure may be altered with disease. For example, in articular cartilage, collagen content decreases and remaining collagen becomes disorganized osteoarthritis. This highlights that collagen is an important biomarker of tissue health and is why imaging collagen with MRI is so important in MSK.

Collagen and quantitative MRI: the short and the magic of it

Collagen is the most common protein in the body3. Each collagen molecule consists of three polypeptide chains that together form a triple helix. Collagen is quite stiff, making it an ideal reinforcing material. Water is present both between and outside the chains; not surprisingly, it has been shown that the outer water protons are considerably more mobile than the inner water protons4. This results in complex, multicomponent relaxation behaviour.

We must remember that collagen is just one component of MSK tissues; thus, relaxation behaviour becomes even more complex. For example, as mentioned above articular cartilage is composed of collagen, proteoglycan and water and it has been shown to have three components at approximately 2.3, 25.2 and 96.3 ms5. If we fit a single T2 relaxation time using a mono-exponential fit, as is commonly done in MSK work, we are obtaining an overall T2 relaxation time not specific to the collagen in the tissue. Because of differences in content, relaxation times vary greatly between MSK tissues. For example, at 3 Tesla, approximate T2* relaxation times are in the range of 1, 2, 10, and 20 ms, for bone, tendon, meniscus and cartilage, respectively6-9.

When collagen is oriented at approximately 55° from the main magnetic field (B0), an erroneous increase in T2 is observed; this is called the Magic Angle Effect. It is most commonly observed in T2-weighted scans of the knee in the posterior femoral condyle cartilage region. The magic angle can be a source of artifact in T2, T2* and T relaxation time mapping but can also be an advantage when trying to determine the orientation of collagen fibers in a tissue1, 10.

Quantitative MRI is proving to be very useful in research studies of MSK diseases such as osteoarthritis. T2, T2* and T relaxation times are higher in the cartilage and meniscus of patients with osteoarthritis and ACL injury6, 11, 12. While standard quantitative MRI sequences can be used to study cartilage, ultra-short echo time sequences are required for studying bone, tendons and ligaments. Ultra-short echo time sequences can be used to study the meniscus; however, modified standard sequences are likely also sufficient given its ~10ms relaxation time. Other quantitative MRI approaches such as sodium MRI, susceptibility mapping and magnetization transfer are also valuable in studying MSK tissues, although their use has been limited to date13-15.

So you have the images, now what?

Image processing is one of the greatest challenges of quantitative MRI of MSK tissues. The first step is ensuring that the source images have sufficient SNR for the subsequent analysis; it has been shown that this value is approximately 2016. The next step is segmenting the desired tissues from the source images. With three-dimensional sequences we obtain a vast amount of data but extracting it can be very difficult since no reliable automated segmentation tool exists for MSK. As a result most studies analyze a single slice or a few slices in each tissue or plate; however, by doing this it is possible that a diseased focal region is excluded from the analysis. Next, a signal model is used to generate the quantitative parameter maps. It is essential to assess the quality of the data fitting procedure; often this is not reported but it should be carried out and it would be very useful if it were reported. Once a map is obtained again, there is a vast amount of data. Most often mean values for the structure or sub-region are calculated; however, some groups do carry out texture or cluster analyses to isolate patterns or defects within the tissues17, 18. While this is not an exhaustive list of post-processing factors to consider, it does highlight some main challenges currently faced by researchers carrying out quantitative MRI research of collagen rich MSK tissues.

Summary

The presence of collagen complicates quantitative MRI assessments of MSK tissues but it also plays a very important functional role. As long as images are acquired, processed and interpreted with care, valid and reliable data can be obtained for research studies.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Bydder, M., et al., The magic angle effect: a source of artifact, determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2007. 25(2): p. 290.

2. Mow, V.C., et al., Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Mechano-Biology, in Biomechanicsl of Bone, R. Wuiskes and B.V. Rietbergen, Editors. 2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philidelphia.

3. Seeley, R.R., et al., Anatomy and Physiology, in Skeletal System: Bones and Bone Tissue, R.R. Seeley, T.D. Stephens, and P. Tate, Editors. 2000, McGraw-Hill: North America.

4. Berendsen, H.J.C., Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study of Collagen Hydration. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1962. 36(12): p. 3297.

5. Reiter, D.A., et al., Multicomponent T2 relaxation analysis in cartilage. Magn Reson Med, 2009. 61(4): p. 803.

6. Williams, A., et al., UTE-T2 * mapping detects sub-clinical meniscus injury after anterior cruciate ligament tear. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2012. 20(6): p. 486.

7. Wang, K., et al., k-space water-fat decomposition with T2* estimation and multifrequency fat spectrum modeling for ultrashort echo time imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010. 31(4): p. 1027.

8. Williams, A., et al., UTE-T2 * mapping of human articular cartilage in vivo: a repeatability assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2011. 19(1): p. 84.

9. Chen, J., et al., Evaluation of bound and pore water in cortical bone using ultrashort-TE MRI. NMR Biomed, 2015. 28(12): p. 1754.

10. Szeverenyi, N.M., et al., Dipolar anisotropy fiber imaging in a goat knee meniscus. Magn Reson Med, 2011. 65(2): p. 463.

11. Zarins, Z.A., et al., Cartilage and meniscus assessment using T1rho and T2 measurements in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2010. 18(11): p. 1408.

12. Carballido-Gamio, J., et al., Spatial analysis of magnetic resonance T1rho and T2 relaxation times improves classification between subjects with and without osteoarthritis. Med Phys, 2009. 36(9): p. 4059.

13. Staroswiecki, E., et al., In vivo sodium imaging of human patellar cartilage with a 3D cones sequence at 3 T and 7 T. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010. 32(2): p. 446.

14. Stikov, N., et al., Cross-relaxation imaging of human articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med, 2011. 66(3): p. 725.

15. Nissi, M.J., et al., Improved Visualization of Cartilage Canals Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping. PLoS One, 2015. 10(7): p. e0132167.

16. Raya, J.G., et al., T2 measurement in articular cartilage: impact of the fitting method on accuracy and precision at low SNR. Magn Reson Med, 2010. 63(1): p. 181.

17. Joseph, G.B., et al., Texture analysis of cartilage T2 maps: individuals with risk factors for OA have higher and more heterogeneous knee cartilage MR T2 compared to normal controls--data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Res Ther, 2011. 13(5): p. R153.

18. Monu, U.D., et al. Cluster Analysis for T2 and T1rho Relaxation Times using 3D Projection Maps of the Femoral Condyle in a Healthy and ACL-injured Population. in 23st Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2015. Toronto, Canada.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)