Synopsis
MRI provides information that makes it uniquely suited as an
imaging modality for guiding neuro interventions. Several MRI systems have been designed or
adapted to help guide neuro interventions; and specialized accessory hardware
has been developed as well. Applications
included conventional tumor resections, biopsy, DBS lead placement, laser
placement and ablation, agent delivery, and focus-ultrasound applications.Highlights
- MRI provides
information that makes it uniquely suited as an imaging modality for guiding
neurosurgical interventions.
- Several MRI systems have been designed or adapted to help
guide neuro interventions; and specialized accessory hardware has been developed
as well.
- Examples of specific interventional neurosurgical
applications will be discussed.
Target audience
Basic scientists and clinicians who are involved or who
desire to become involved in MRI-guided neurosurgical applications.
Objectives
- Understand equipment
requirements for MRI-guided neuro interventions.
- Appreciate the imaging characteristics that
enable MRI to be well-suited for guiding interventions.
- Understand several of the major applications of MRI-guided
neuro interventions.
Introduction
Due to many desirable features, MRI can be used to guide or
assist in guiding neurosurgical procedures.
Broadly speaking, applications often take advantage of the strengths of MRI
to guide the trajectory of a device, to monitor a therapy in realtime, or to provide
immediate feedback or confirm the results of an intervention performed outside
the magnet; many applications use a combination of these.
Methods
MRI systems used for neuro interventions historically were low field configurations (0.35T-1.0T).
Often, these systems had an open configuration; examples include
vertical field magnets; the “double-doughnut” system; and small footprint
magnets specifically designed for the neuro OR.
In recent years, the advantages of higher field systems (1.5T and 3T)
for imaging have lead to the development of neuro-interventional suites that can
accommodate these magnets. Examples include
the sliding magnet design with fixed OR position (IMRIS/Deerfield Imaging,
Minneapolis, MN, USA) and fixed magnet position with transfer from the OR to
the patient (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) (Figure 1). Conversely, many neurosurgical procedures can
be performed in the magnet or just outside the magnet with appropriate suite
design and/or specialized instruments.
Several specific MRI guided procedures have been
developed for neuro interventions. These
include device guidance with MRI visible guidance systems (Navigus, Medtronic,
Minneapolis, MN, USA; Clearpoint, MRI Interventions, Irvine, CA, USA) (Figure
2); and these types of guidance systems are often used in procedures such as
MRI-guided brain biopsy; deep brain stiumulator (DBS) lead implantation; laser
ablation (Neuroblate, Monteris Medical, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Visualase,
Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) ; focused ultrasound (FUS) ablation (Insightec,
Tirat Carmel, Israel); convection-enhanced delivery (CED); and FUS-mediated
drug delivery.
Results
MRI is very often used in conventional neurosurgery,
acquired pre-operatively; with the pre-operative images used in conventional OR
neuronavigation (e.g. Stealth, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Intraoperative MRI has been used to help
guide tumor resections, beginning in some centers in the 1990’s. Because the brain often shifts during
craniotomy, intraoperative MRI can be used to provide updated imaging sets, and
can often provide more complete resections, particularly for complicated
surgical procedures (1).
Some early MRI-guided neuronavigation used frameless
guidance systems; and have been used successfully for biopsy (2) and DBS lead placement, with millimeter
to sub-millimeter accuracy. The more
recently development Clearpoint system (MRI Interventions, Irvine, CA, USA) has
been able to achieve sub-millimeter targeting accuracy (3,4) with outcomes for DBS similar
to those for conventional OR techniques (5).
Currently in the USA, two companies have received FDA approval for
laser-ablation devices for use in neurosurgery.
Therapies have been most often performed for tumor ablation and epilepsy
treatment. Due to the proton resonance
frequency effect, MRI can used to monitor relative temperature change in real
time and predict the thermal dose to tissue.
Immediately post-procedure, MRI can confirm the extent of therapy on
DWI, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, and subsequently monitor
treatment volume progression and potential recurrence for tumors (6). Industry-sponsored trials are currently
underway to determine the efficacy of laser treatments.
Focused Ultrasound (FUS) is being investigated as treatment
for essential tremor, Parkinson’s Disease, and neuropathic pain; and likely
applications include epilepsy (7). In addition, FUS has been used to interrupt
the blood-brain barrier for the delivery of therapeutic agents in animal models (7). Another technique, convection enhanced
delivery (CED), has used the slow delivery of agents directly through a
catheter directly to targets in the brain, bypassing the blood-brain barrier. By co-injecting a Gd-based contrast agent or
GBCA-infused liposomes, the injection can be visualized on MRI (8).
Discussion
MRI has been used for many neuro-surgical interventions, for
planning, navigation/trajectory guidance, real-time monitoring of therapy, and
therapy confirmation. Several features
of MRI can make its use in interventions appealing, include favorable soft
tissue contrast, lack of ionizing radiation, the ability to account for
intra-procedural tissue shifts, and the ability to map relative temperature
changes during thermal therapies.
Despite its potential advantages, MRI-guided neuro
interventions face competition from traditional and other new neurosurgical techniques. One challenge is the cost, either with
a dedicated MRI system for use in the OR, or by using time on MRI systems
that could otherwise be used for diagnostic procedures. Conventional neurosurgical techniques often
have advantages compared to their MRI-based counterparts, and other recently
developed non-MRI guided techniques may also offer benefits not easily
obtained with MRI.
Conclusions
MRI provides information that makes it well-suited for
neuro interventions. Several MRI
systems have been designed or adapted to help guide neuro interventions; and
specialized accessory hardware and associated software has been developed. Many advanced neurosurgical procedures are
possible under MRI guidance.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Mehdorn H,
Nabavi A, Schwartz F, Doerner L. Intraoperative MRI Scanning in High-Grade
Gliomas. In: Hall WA, Nimsky C, Truwit CL, editors. Intraoperative MRI-Guided
Neurosurgery. New York: Thieme; 2011. p. 108-118.
2. Hall WA,
Martin AJ, Liu H, Nussbaum ES, Maxwell RE, Truwit CL. Brain biopsy using
high-field strength interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery
1999;44(4):807-813; discussion 813-804.
3. Martin A,
Larson P, Bates G, Starr P. DBS Electrode Positioning Accuracy in the STN and
GPi with Intraoperative MR Guidance. In: Proceedings of the 20th ISMRM,
Melbourne, 2012. (abstract 211).
4. Vigen KK,
Rusy D, Buyan-Dent L, Ninman NL, Sillay KA. Wide-Bore MRI Guided DBS Surgery:
Initial Experience. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ISMRM, Toronto, 2015. (abstract
872).
5. Ostrem JL,
Galifianakis NB, Markun LC, et al. Clinical outcomes of PD patients having
bilateral STN DBS using high-field interventional MR-imaging for lead placement.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115(6):708-712.
6. Medvid R,
Ruiz A, Komotar RJ, et al. Current Applications of MRI-Guided Laser
Interstitial Thermal Therapy in the Treatment of Brain Neoplasms and Epilepsy:
A Radiologic and Neurosurgical Overview. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2015;36(11):1998-2006.
7. Kobus T,
McDannold N. Update on Clinical Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound
Applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2015;23(4):657-667.
8. Lonser RR,
Sarntinoranont M, Morrison PF, Oldfield EH. Convection-enhanced delivery to the
central nervous system. J Neurosurg 2015;122(3):697-706.