Synopsis
Multimodal bone marrow imaging has the potential to address the unmet need for a robust imaging methodology that allows understanding of tumor biology, lesion detection and therapy evaluation of advanced metastatic disease. This means that there is a clearer categorization of bone metastases response. Multimodal bone imaging could be used for both clinical practice and can be incorporated into clinical trials, generating new biomarkers that in turn will require independent validation.Introduction
Current methods of assessing tumor response at
skeletal sites with metastatic disease use imaging tests, tumor markers, serum
and urine biochemical of bone heath, and symptoms assessments. Radiological
approaches for metastatic evaluations have specific advantages including their
disease manifestation-specific depiction ability (i.e., ability to separately
identify/measure local disease, bone, nodal and visceral disease), non-invasive nature,
documentation ability, variable ability for whole body imaging, resolution
flexibility (sub-millimetre to sub-centimetre), ability to depict physiological
and molecular processes, ready access to imaging technologies in many cases and
the ability to assess spatial heterogeneity of disease distribution and response.
Multimodal imaging
When
multimodal imaging is used to observe bone metastases a number of patterns are
observed (table 1). Since single imaging method evaluates metastatic bone disease biology; a
comprehensive evaluation requires a multimodal approach to gain an
understanding of cancer cell-bone matrix interactions and how that affects appearances
(table 2), detection ability and response
to therapy.
MRI is a truly multifunctional (non-hybrid) evaluation
method for bone metastasis detection and response
assessments. Relevant sequences include
T1-weighted spin-echo, T2-weighted (with or without fat suppression) and short
tau inversion recovery (STIR) which are sensitive to the cellular, fat and
water content of the bone marrow.
Gradient-echo proton density/T1 sequences using two or three point Dixon
techniques (yielding in-phase, opposed phase, water only, fat only, T2* and
water and fat fraction images) can be used to objectively evaluate the relative
water and fat content of bone marrow.
Susceptibility weighted (T2*) sequences are sensitive to spin dephasing
induced by trabecular bone. Ultrashort
TE (UTE) sequences can also evaluate trabecular bone structure
in healthy bone and metastatic disease.
A number of studies have evaluated bone marrow vascularisation using DCE-MRI
techniques. DWI is also being used
because of its sensitivity to bone marrow cellularity, the relative proportions
of fat and marrow cells, water content and bone marrow perfusion.
Response assessments
Therapy assessments of bone disease are made by observing changes in the
volume and symmetry of signal intensity abnormalities on diffusion weighted
images together with changes in ADC values [2].
Cross correlating DW imaging findings with morphological appearances on
T1W, fat-saturated T2W/STIR and Dixon F% images is important. Cross correlation with other imaging modalities
adds value and confidence to MR image interpretations.
Several distinct patterns being recognized in the therapy
assessment setting:
1. Increases in the volume of previously documented abnormal signal
intensity, new areas of abnormal signal intensity, or increases in the
intensity of abnormalities on high b-value DW images can indicate disease
progression. Modest increases, unchanged or slight decreases in ADC values
compared to pretherapy values occurs in the setting of progression.
2. T2-shine through -
occasionally persistent high signal intensity on high b-value images is associated
with marked rises in ADC values is observed. This pattern indicates that there
has been a successful response to therapy.
3. Decreases in bone marrow disease signal intensity on high b-value
images are generally observed with successful treatments. The extent of ADC increases seems to depend
on the type of treatment given. It has been noted that ADC increases are
greater for cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation. When patients are treated
successfully with hormonal therapies ADC value increases
seem to be less marked. Later on increases in bone marrow fat can be seen within
bone marrow lesions indicative of ongoing therapy response. When fat re-emerges in bone marrow lesions,
resolution of tumor matrix mineralisation on CT scans can often be seen.
4. Occasionally
high b-value signal intensity decreases are associated no ADC
increases. Generally this pattern
generally occurs in clinical responders although very occasionally we have
noted it in non-responders (so called sclerotic progression). These appearances as thus indeterminate
and currently we use morphologic and clinical assessments to assign the final
response category.
5. Stable
disease is characterized by unchanging appearances on high b-value images. ADC changes can be variable, often remaining
stable but are sometimes slight decreased presumably because of increases in
cell density within lesions that are unchanging in their extent.
Conclusions
Multimodal bone marrow imaging has the potential to address the unmet need for a robust
imaging methodology that allows understanding of tumor biology, lesion detection
and therapy evaluation of advanced metastatic disease. This means that there is a clearer
categorization of bone metastases response (unlike bone scans that only
identify disease progression); and more accurate assessments of therapy
response (including heterogeneity of response).
Multimodal bone imaging could be used for both clinical practice and can
be incorporated into clinical trials, generating new biomarkers that in turn
will require independent validation.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1: Padhani AR, Miles KA. Multiparametric imaging of tumor response to therapy. Radiology. 2010; 256(2):348-64. 2: Padhani AR, Makris A, Gall P, Collins DJ, Tunariu N, de Bono JS. Therapy monitoring of skeletal metastases with whole-body diffusion MRI. JMRI 2014; 39(5):1049-78.