Synopsis
MRI has become a useful adjuvant in the
evaluation of fetal body abnormalities. Advantages over ultrasound include: Multiplanar capability and large field of
view with excellent tissue contrast resolution, providing a better image of the pathology, increasing
confidence in diagnosis facilitating counseling and treatment planning. A broad variety of abnormalities with widely
variable prognosis can be seen in the chest and abdomen by prenatal imaging. Early and
accurate diagnosis is important to appropriately counsel, plan management and improve
outcomes. Ultrasound is the screening tool to first identify an abnormality.
Magnetic resonance imaging has been
shown to be a valuable adjuvant study. MRI description of the different
entities affecting the chest and the abdomen as well as prognosis and fetal management options
arediscussed.
Several advantages are seen when using MRI
in the assessment of anomalies compared to ultrasound, including its
multiplanar capability, large field of view, and soft tissue contrast between
bowel, liver, normal lung and lung masses. The large field of view allows
improved visualization of the lesions, useful for families and specialists to
review and understand. In the setting of oligohydramnios and maternal obesity,
MRI can delineate structures when US is unable to. MRI is not operator dependent, a vulnerability
of ultrasound.
Improvements in ultrafast sequences help reduce motion artifact
and have diminished the need for sedation.
A wide variety of congenital anomalies
affect the thoracic and abdominal regions of the fetus. They can be small and asymptomatic or
large and cause mass effect, with outcomes that vary significantly depending on
associated anomalies and presence of complications such as lung hypoplasia and
hydrops. These complications are of significant importance in the prognosis of
the fetus.
Third trimester MR can help plan for
postnatal care obviating the need for additional postnatal imaging which could require
radiation and/or sedation.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Kul S, Ata Korkmaz HA, Cansu A,
et al. Contribution of MRI to Ultrasound in the Diagnogis of Fetal Anomalies. J
Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:882-90.
2.
Breysem L, Bosmans H,
Dymarkowski S, et al. The value of fast MR imaging as an adjunct to ultrasound
in prenatal diagnosis. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:1538
3.
Levine D, Barnewolt CE,
MehtaTS, et al. Fetal thoracic abnormalities: MR imaging 2003;228:379-88.
4.
Hubbard AM, Adzick NS,
Crombleholme TM, et al. Congenital chest lesions: diagnosis and
characterization with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 1999;212:43.
5.
We JS, Young L, Park iI, et al.
Usefullness of additional fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal
diagnosis of congenital abnormalities. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286:1443-52.
6. Bailey PV, Tracy TF Jr, Connors RH et al
(1993) Congenital duodenal obstruction: a 32-year review. J Pediatr Surg 28:92-95.
7. Bulas D and Egloff AM. Fetal
Chest Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Recent Advances and Current
Clinical Applications. Radiol Clin N Am. 2011;49:805-23.
8. Werler MM, Sheehan JE, Mitchell AA (2003) Association of vasoconstrictive
exposures with risks of gastroschisis and small intestinal atresia. Epidemiology 14:349-354
9. Colombani M,
Ferry M, Garel C et al (2010) Fetal gastrointestinal MRI: all that glitters in
T1 is not necessarily colon. Pediatr Radiol 40:1215-1221