Synopsis
Advanced
multimodal MRI has been shown to improve the diagnosis, classification and post
therapy changes of brain tumors, despite the limitations. Further research into
the ‘omic’ classification and their imaging correlates of these tumors will
help in prediction of their treatment response and tumor free survival. Introduction
Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
of brain tumors allow not only high resolution structural imaging for the pre-
operative planning of brain neoplasms, but also provide details of the
cellular, architectural, microvascular and metabolic milieu of the tumor that
helps in grading and prognostication of these lesions
1. Recent
advances in Perfusion Weighted Imaging (PWI), Diffusion and Diffusion Tensor Imaging
(DWI and DTI), Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI), Multivoxel MR Spectroscopic
Imaging (MRSI) and functional MRI (fMRI) have paved the way for more accurate and
efficient pre- operative diagnosis, treatment planning and follow up.
Therapeutic
implications of classification of brain tumors
Despite
the well known limitations of subjectivity, inter-observer variability and errors
due to under sampling, the 2007 modification of WHO classification is
considered as standard for brain tumor stratification and treatment decisions
even now. This histopathological classification is based mainly on tumor
cellularity, nuclear atypia, pleomorphism, necrosis and mitosis. However it is highly controversial that the
histological grading alone can determine the outcome of therapeutic interventions
in various brain tumors. Surrogate imaging
signatures derived from advanced physiological neuroimaging might provide pre-
surgical information on the genetically determined possible biologic behavioral
differences between tumors of the same WHO type and grade. Thus a genomic or
transcriptomic sub-classification of these tumors and their imaging correlates (Imaging
genomics) becomes all the more important, especially in high grade tumors with
generally poor therapeutic outcome. Development of novel targeted anti- cancer
medications and personalized therapeutic strategies have already resulted in
improvement in prognosis in selected tumor subtypes.
Advanced
MR imaging
Perfusion
Imaging: PWI using
Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)
sequences has been extensively studied for pre and post therapy clinical
evaluation of glial and non- glial neoplasms of the brain. The relative
Cerebral Blood Volume (rCBV) maps derived from DSC imaging will provide a
surrogate marker of tumor microvascularity and VEGF expression2, 3.
However inherent limitations of the technique and the diverse acquisition and processing
methods used, make it difficult to standardize the sequence across different
field strengths and vendors. There can be gross under or overestimation of CBV
depending on the tumor type, extend of blood brain barrier (BBB) breakdown and
the sequence parameters used. However still it is useful in differentiating low
grade glial neoplasms (WHO grade 2) from high grade (grade 3 and 4)2.
One caveat is that highly perfused solid areas can be detected in pilocytic
astrocytomas (WHO grade 1), benign oligodendrogliomas and choroid plexus tumors.
Thus MR perfusion alone may not be useful for pre- operative tumor grading. Recently
Time – Intensity Curve analysis and Percentage of Signal Recovery calculations
have been shown to give further insight into the type of tumor vascularity and degree
of breakdown of BBB, thus helping in differentiating tumors4. Although
rCBV might be useful in diagnosing high grade gliomas, a recent report has
shown that CBV is not significantly different among molecular subclasses of
GBM. Several reports have also shown the usefulness of DSC perfusion in
differentiating non- glial tumors like metastasis, primary CNS lymphoma or extra
axial lesions like meningiomas. DCE perfusion helps in estimating the
endothelial permeability due to BBB disruption by measuring parameters like Ktrans.
This is also useful for tumor grading.
DCE imaging has advantages like better spatial resolution and less
susceptibility to artifacts, but has a more complex data set for analysis1. Ktrans from DCE and rCBV from DSC
imaging remain the main in- vivo parameters used by researchers to measure the
capillary permeability and angiogenesis respectively in brain tumors. Further clinical
and research uses of PWI include selection of biopsy site representing the most
malignant area of the tumor, monitoring efficacy of anti-angiogenic
medications, altering the BBB permeability for better local drug delivery and
differentiating radio-chemotherapy induced necrosis from tumor
recurrence. Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) perfusion has also been shown to be
useful, especially in pediatric population.
Diffusion
Imaging and DTI: One
of the earliest applications of DWI in brain tumors was to determine the tumor
cellularity. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in highly cellular portions
of the tumors is found to be low because of the reduced extracellular space
available for free water diffusion in such areas. However inferring cellularity
based only on ADC measurements can be fallacious. ADC measurements have also been
proved to be useful in differentiating gliomas from PCNS lymphomas and their
post therapy follow up for recurrence free survival. DTI on the other hand
helps in determining the microstructural alterations caused by brain tumors by
measuring parameters like Fractional Anisotrpy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD)
in and around the tumor. It is found to be useful in separating vasogenic from infiltrative
edema around the tumor which can differentiate solitary metastasis from high
grade gliomas5,6. More advanced metrics like Planar Anisotropy (CP),
Linear Anisotropy (CL), Spherical Anisotropy (CS), pure isotropic component of
diffusion (p), anisotropic component of diffusion (q) and total magnitude of diffusion tensor (L) help
to further characterize the microstructural alterations in and around the tumor
helping in making specific tumor diagnosis7,8. However its role in
prediction of prognosis with specific therapy is yet to be proved9.
DTI also helps in representing eloquent white matter tracts distorted or
displaced by the tumor tissue which can be represented in a three dimensional
manner helping surgeon to plan the best “angle of attack” for resection of the
tumor. Exporting the DTI data to neuronavigational suite or even performing
per- operative fiber tractography has been shown to be useful in reducing the
post operative morbidity.
Susceptibility
Weighted Imaging: SWI
can detect vascular structures, blood products and calcification within the
tumor matrix. Intratumoral susceptibility signals (ITSS) has been used to
differentiate GBM, metastasis and lymphomas10,11. The ITSS is least
prominent in lymphoma and most prominent in GBM.
Multivoxel MR Spectroscopy: MRSI also known as chemical shift
imaging (CSI), helps to map the metabolic profile of brain tumors12.
Specific metabolites like as n-acetylaspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), choline
(Cho), lipids and lactate within intra and peri-tumoral regions can be semi-
quantitatively mapped and compared with normal appearing contralateral brain
regions. However most brain tumors have a non-specific spectrum with increased Cho/Cr
and decreased NAA/Cr ratios within the tumor due to high myelin turnover and disruption
of neuronal integrity. Normalized choline map is also shown to be useful.
However there is still controversy on the real use of spectroscopy in grading
tumors. Lipid as a marker of necrosis and lactate as a marker of hypoxia and
anaerobic metabolism have been studied especially with the use of lactate
edited spectroscopy. Other metabolites studied include GLX and myoinositol.
Recently 2-Hydroxyglutarate (2HG) detected on in-vivo MRS has been implicated
with IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation status of glial tumors predicting
better outcome after therapy13,14.
Multimodal MR Imaging: Combined
use of advanced MRI protocols augments the conventional MRI in diagnosis of
brain tumors15,16. For example use of rCBV together with ADC
measurements increases the efficiency of glioma grading pre- operatively.
Similarly combination of DTI metrics and perfusion imaging has also been found
to be useful. This synergistic effect of multimodal imaging is only natural as
histopathological diagnosis depends on many factors including cellularity and
vascularity of the tumor.
Functional MRI: Mapping the eloquent cortex using
task based BOLD fMRI to prevent or minimize the post operative functional deficits
has been in use for several years. Recently resting state functional MR
(rsfMRI) studies have also been used to map the language and motor networks
pre- operatively.
Other advances: Amide Proton Transfer Imaging (APT),
Intravoxel Incoherent Motion imaging, Sodium imaging, novel methods of BBB
manipulation using image guided focused ultrasound for selective drug delivery
applications, development of new targeted contrast agents are active areas of
research.
Imaging
Genomics
With
the new interest in ‘omics’, the classification of brain tumors is changing
rapidly and the next WHO classification is bound to include them, as tumors of
the same WHO class and grade differ drastically in response to therapy and
which can be predicted by their genomic sub-classification like IDH1 and 2
mutations and MGMT promoter methylation status in GBMs
17-19. Some of the
conventional imaging features like location, type of contrast enhancement, non-
enhancing tumor areas and necrosis has been shown to have ‘omic’ correlation
and hence predictable treatment response. Similar research is going on to
classify many tumor types like Medulloblastoma into transcriptomic sub classes
like WNT, SHH, Group 3 and 4 with their imaging correlates to design specific
targeted therapy and to predict overall prognosis
20,21.
Conclusions
Advanced
multimodal MRI has been shown to improve the diagnosis, classification and post
therapy changes of brain tumors, despite the limitations. Further research into
the ‘omic’ classification and their imaging correlates in these tumors will
help in prediction of their treatment response and tumor free survival.
Acknowledgements
Author would like to thank colleagues in the departments of IS &IR, Neurosurgery and Pathology for their contributions in the preparation of this manuscript.References
1. Cha, S. Update on Brain Tumor Imaging: From Anatomy to Physiology. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 27, 475–487 (2006).
2. Law, M. et al. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeabilityfrom dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 25, 746–755 (2004).
3. Law, M. et al. Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 247, 490–498 (2008).
4. Cha, S. et al. Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme and single brain metastasis by peak height and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 28, 1078–1084 (2007).
5. Lu, S et al Peritumoral diffusion tensor imaging of high-grade gliomas and metastatic brain tumors. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 24, 937–941 (2003).
6. Wang, S. et al. Diagnostic utility of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating glioblastomas from brain metastases. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 35, 928–934 (2014).
7. Wang, W et al Diffusion tensor imaging in glioblastoma multiforme and brain metastases: the role of p, q, L, and fractional anisotropy. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 30, 203–208 (2009).
8. Smitha, K. A., et al. Total magnitude of diffusion tensor imaging as an effective tool for the differentiation of glioma. Eur. J. Radiol. 82, 857–861 (2013).
9. Muthusami, P et al. Glioma progression as revealed by diffusion tensor metrics. Neurol. India 60, 355–357 (2012).
10. Park, S. M et al Combination of high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient: added value to brain tumour imaging and clinical feasibility of non-contrast MRI at 3T. Br. J. Radiol. 83, 466–475 (2010).
11. Mittal, S., et al Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.30, 232–252 (2009).
12. Martín Noguerol T, et al Clinical Imaging of Tumor Metabolism with (1)H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. ;24(1):57-86 (2016).
13. de la Fuente MI et al. Integration of 2-hydroxyglutarate-proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy into clinical practice for disease monitoring in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant glioma. Neuro Oncol.;18(2):283-90. (2016)
14. Emir UE et al. Noninvasive Quantification of 2-Hydroxyglutarate in Human Gliomas with IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations. Cancer Res. 76(1):43-9 (2016).
15. Essig, M. et al. MR imaging of neoplastic central nervous system lesions: review and recommendations for current practice. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33, 803–817 (2012).
16. Koob M et al. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI to determine pediatric brain tumor grades and types. J Neurooncol. PubMed PMID: 26732081 (2016).
17. Chen R et al. Molecular features assisting in diagnosis, surgery, and treatment decision making in low-grade gliomas. Neurosurg Focus.;38(3): (2015)
18. El Banan MG et al. Imaging genomics of Glioblastoma: state of the art bridge between genomics and neuroradiology. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. ;25(1):141-53.(2015)
19. Pope WB. Genomics of brain tumor imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am.;25(1):105-19 (2015)
20. Perreault S et al MRI surrogates for molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.;35(7):1263-9 (2014).
21. Patay Z, et al MR Imaging Characteristics of Wingless-Type-Subgroup Pediatric Medulloblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ;36(12):2386-93 (2015).